skyeandangus
n00b
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2004
- Messages
- 57
Let me confess. I'm cheap...Well, poor too. I'm trying to squeeze every last bit out of my Athlon XP system, which is running a 2400+ and a gig of memory. I have a 9700 Pro in it right now, and it seems fine. I've skipped, oh, about three generations of video cards, since the games have been playing fine.
What I never see is comparisons between different generations of video cards. For example, is my 9700 Pro better than a 700 Pro, or a 6600GT, or a 6200Gt, for example. In general, newer cards are better, as older cards get phased out. But this isn't normally true in the value and mid-range (Geforce 4mx and 9500 Pro come to mind, for opposite reasons) I've seen the Tom's and Adrians Ropjak Pot charts, but they only mention specs, not perfomance.
For example, if nothing else in my system changes, is a 128mb 6600GT better, worse, or the same as my 9700 pro?
What I never see is comparisons between different generations of video cards. For example, is my 9700 Pro better than a 700 Pro, or a 6600GT, or a 6200Gt, for example. In general, newer cards are better, as older cards get phased out. But this isn't normally true in the value and mid-range (Geforce 4mx and 9500 Pro come to mind, for opposite reasons) I've seen the Tom's and Adrians Ropjak Pot charts, but they only mention specs, not perfomance.
For example, if nothing else in my system changes, is a 128mb 6600GT better, worse, or the same as my 9700 pro?