• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Comparing 2 Intel SSD's vs single SSD -R/W speed differences

T

tankman1989

Gawd
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
588
I have the below drive and am thinking of buying the second link below which I can get for $100 NIB. I'm thinking of running the drives in RAID 0. The write speeds are 90/70 Mbps for the: X25-M/Intel 320 Series. I've seen other drives that have a write speeds of 260Mbps on SATA II which is greater than the combined write speeds of the two intel drives in a RAID 0 array.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820167031

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820167047

I'm wondering if this drive isn't a better choice if I am trying to get more performance and greater capacity. I don't need the 160GB of the RAID 0 and I would prefer not having to do software RAID 0 anyway. For only $20 more than what I'm paying for the 80GB drive, is this a no brainer?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227726
 
the agility drive can't handle random data, it uses async nand. skip that. their numbers are inflated by atto, they don't actually perform that well.
 
gjs278 said:
the agility drive can't handle random data, it uses async nand. skip that. their numbers are inflated by atto, they don't actually perform that well.
Click to expand...

That's dissapointing. I'm thinking the Intel drives are lower stats but probably legitimate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top