Can someone explain why "committed memory" isn't treated as being "in use"? If all my memory is committed then applications will start to fail from lack of "free memory" even though the amount "in use" is less than 20% of "available". It seems that if memory is committed then it is infact not available (at least to anything other than the process it is committed to). To have this differentiation seems to be an over complication with no actual use.
![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
-
Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.
Committed Memory vs. Memory in use
- Thread starter cw64
- Start date