• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Check Out My Rantings

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

bore_u2_death

Limp Gawd
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Messages
357
EDIT: I decided that it isn't really that important for me to start a flame war.

All Radeon 5 and 6 owners, I would really appreciate your input, especially if you would like to help prove or disprove the articles lately speaking of IQ differences in Cat 10.11. You must use Cat 10.11 for your gameplay experience to be valid.

This is what I want you to do:

When you are gaming, on occasion change the Texture Filtering setting in CCC from Quality to High Quality. You could have one gaming session with Q, and then another session with HQ, or however you would like. Keep all the other settings the same so that there is only one variable.

During these gaming sessions, does the "IQ difference" resultant of changing settings from Q to HQ ever become noticeable? I want your subjective opinion.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Shouldn't you be ranting on the AMD forums for crippling the visual quality of the HD6800 series?
 
Didn't we just have a thread on this that got closed because it was pointless? Do we really need another one? They changed their settings, get over it.
 
Everyone has to see this. nVIDIA fanboys who accept an article that is based on other flawed articles with flawed ideas of what a compromise on image quality is need to see this the most.
 
SonDa5 said:
Shouldn't you be ranting on the AMD forums for crippling the visual quality of the HD6800 series?
Click to expand...
This is a gross mischaracterization, and the sole cause of the previous thread's lock.
Let's not do this again.

Everyone has to see this. nVIDIA fanboys who accept an article that is based on other flawed articles with flawed ideas of what a compromise on image quality is need to see this the most.
Click to expand...
Who cares, it's on a competitor's website, what else do you expect?
Anyone who reads the article can figure that out for themselves. I didn't read it because I'm already well aware of the situation.

If anyone else wants balanced information about the texture issue they can get it from an unbiased benchmark website.
 
I don't really know what the fuss is about but...

What's the point of high quality if you can't even tell it's there without carefully studying screen shots with image alterations?

Who's side am I on by saying that anyway?

Do people really care that much about such minor image quality adjustments? If so, who are these people? Robots?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top