Haha Sweden is about 1:100th the size of the US. That's pathetic.
(before you nitpick, I made up the size ratio.)
Actually you're not too far off... Approximately 4%
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sw.html
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha Sweden is about 1:100th the size of the US. That's pathetic.
(before you nitpick, I made up the size ratio.)
i'd still rather have fios
Sounds like Shaw except they are 1mbit up for the 25mbit package.S[H]ady;1033663884 said:Wow!
I'm surprised thats the fastest available in the states.
My ISP just silently launched a 100Mbit connection. I won't name the ISP because they have not announced it yet (wen't live yesterday), but suffice to say its a major canadian ISP.
no one will likely be getting it though.
100Mbit down.
5Mbit up (internally tested at 100mbit up, but they refuse to give the customer any higher than 5)
200GB/Month bandwidth.
Now all that seams "ok", especially considering the fastsest availble before that (at least in my city) was 25Mbit for a residential connection. But when you hear the price it gets a bit out of hand.
$250/month if you have tv
$270/month standalone
the 25Mbit connection only has 2Mbit up, and it costs $100/month.
Why are internet connections over seas so damn cheap!??! I would pay 100 bucks a month for a 100up/100down connection without batting an eye.
hell i'd probably pay 100 bucks a month to match my current 10 down with 10 up.
35%? My father's taxed at close to 45% income between federal and state (CT) and he's right here in the US!
Haha, that's pathetic. In sweden you can buy a 100/100mbit connection for 30= 45$ a month and here in finland you can get the same connection in some places for 45 = 65$ / month.
Didn't know there weren't even any 100mbit connections available over there.
As a FORMER Charter Tier II Support Tech (3+ years ago) with connection with people that still work in the NOC, At least in California Charter in no way, has the inferstructure to support this kind of bandwidth.
At the time I left about 80% of all the CMTS in SoCal were nearly maxed out in bandwith, with no plans to upgrade.
They are still a joke.
As a FORMER Charter Tier II Support Tech (3+ years ago) with connection with people that still work in the NOC, At least in California Charter in no way, has the inferstructure to support this kind of bandwidth.
At the time I left about 80% of all the CMTS in SoCal were nearly maxed out in bandwith, with no plans to upgrade.
They are still a joke.
Wow. It didn't take long for the ignorant "Small nation FOO with insane population density has five bazillion terrabit quantum netowork service for four pesos a month! USA sucks!" posts to start.
Before I moved to the Comcast wasteland I had 20/20 FiOS (before they upped the speeds) and the ONLY thing that could feed that pipe was bittorrent. It was total overkill for anything else. 50mbps? WTF for?
Charter is on the edge of bankruptcy. They are in debt up the ass and their stock is trading at $0.09 a share.
http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=NASDAQ:CHTR
These guys are fucked.
LOLHow bout vagina?
Don't you think this is a better deal than the Fios?
+1No, because FIOS isn't affected by other people's usage. I can download at 5 megabytes per second on fiber from usenet 24/7 and it simply never slows down.
Still Charter. Still awful. Still horrible customer service. Still the only f'ing provider available to my apartment building even in a city of 250K+.