• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

celeron D vs. p4 505

kdream3

Limp Gawd
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
128
So im looking at building a small form factor comp for my girlfriend. It will mainly be used for websurfing, ms office, etc.. So heres my question, with a difference of $16 what will be the performance difference between these two processors?

Intel Pentium 4 505 533MHz FSB LGA 775 Processor $116
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819116204

Intel Celeron D 340J 533MHz FSB LGA 775 $100
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819112191

Should i just pay the extra for a p4 so maybe I could play some games on low settings on it? thx.
 
Yea I thought about the 3100+ sempron and I would go with that but it is socket 754. Which doesnt give me much upgradibility with 754 dying off. I did hear some rumors about the sempron 64's coming to socket 939. In fact HP is selling some computers with them in them. Does anyone know anything about them beoming available for sale?
 
kdream3 said:
So what would be better performance wise?
I think both would be pretty close. Almost 300MHz higher speed at the same bus speed for both evens it out. Some things using heavy SSE1/2 (e.g. encoding) will be faster on the Celeron due to the higher clock speed.

I don't see any direct comparisons, but this is a P4 2.8GHz (800MHz FSB) vs a Celeron D 340: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/print/celeron-d.html

And THG has a P4 2.53GHz and a Celeron D 2.8GHz that run close in most benchmarks: http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20041221/cpu_charts-13.html
 
kdream3 said:
Yea I thought about the 3100+ sempron and I would go with that but it is socket 754. Which doesnt give me much upgradibility with 754 dying off. I did hear some rumors about the sempron 64's coming to socket 939. In fact HP is selling some computers with them in them. Does anyone know anything about them beoming available for sale?


She's not gaming is she? Upgradeability is not an issue. By the time she will need to upgrade Skt 755 will be long gone. And besides, the Intel chips she could pontentally upgrade to are way overpriced.
 
If you do decide to go with the 505 P4, don't...get the 506 instead...adds 64-bit (EM64T) support.
 
Thx for the info guys im gonna go with the 3100+ sempron 64 for $105 and the nvidia geforce 6100 microatx mobo.
 
kdream3 said:
Thx for the info guys im gonna go with the 3100+ sempron 64 for $105 and the nvidia geforce 6100 microatx mobo.
The Sempron 3100+ is a better choice for a SFF system. It runs 22W cooler than the P4 and Celerons discussed above. Undervolt it and it will run even cooler.
 
pxc said:
The Sempron 3100+ is a better choice for a SFF system. It runs 22W cooler than the P4 and Celerons discussed above. Undervolt it and it will run even cooler.

Well for gaming the Sempron would be better. For overall performance though a P4 with HT would be better.

So back to the original question, I would go with this Pentium 4 506 with HT, and overclock it to 3Ghz+. Around 3Ghz + depending on the cooling in the SFF, should give nice performance and smooth multi-tasking performance which the Sempron won't be quite as good at.
 
Definitely get the AMD... OCing tends to be hands on and quite involved, you don't want to give someone an OCed machine if you're not always gonna be around to fix it... Get something that will run cooler and a little better @ stock & stable
 
pxc said:
The P4 506 doesn't have hyperthreading. I have 2 in front of me. :p

Well DAMN NEWEGG says it does!!

I thought the 3.06Ghz was the only 533 P4 with HT, but newegg said the 506 did, so I thought maybe the new 5_6's must have it.

Ok just did a little research:

5_0 - 800FSB, HT, 1Mb -------------------------------------------- Ex: 530
5_0j - 800FSB, HT, 1MB, + XD ----------------------------------- Ex: 530j
5_1 - 800FSB, HT, 1MB, + XD, + 64-bit support ----------- Ex: 531
5_5 - 533FSB, 1MB --------------------------------------------------- Ex: 505, 515
5_6 - 533FSB, 1MB, +XD, + 64-bit ------------------------------ Ex: 506, 516
5_9 - 533FSB, 1MB, +XD. + 64-bit ------------------------------ Ex: 519
 
The celeron has a high clock speed and the P4 has more cache, although p4 clock speed is lower it still pwn the celeron, the P4 has HT which make things alot snappier, i would say it worths the extra $16
 
delusion_2005 said:
The celeron has a high clock speed and the P4 has more cache, although p4 clock speed is lower it still pwn the celeron, the P4 has HT which make things alot snappier, i would say it worths the extra $16

This P4 doesn't have HT, thus it not only lacks clockspeed, it also lacks multitasking, the only redeeming feature of the P4.
 
robberbaron said:
the only redeeming feature of the P4.

Not the only, but definitely the main thing I would want for any system. (multitasking)

Intel needs to make their Celerons basically the 5_1 series, and the P4's the 600/800 series.

IE: Celeron should have 1Mb, HT, 64-bit, 800FSB

HT is far more valuable than EMT64
 
kdream3 said:
Thx for the info guys im gonna go with the 3100+ sempron 64 for $105 and the nvidia geforce 6100 microatx mobo.


woohoo!

another conversion to the dark side!

and in the heart of the intel forum as well :p
 
pxc said:
The Sempron 3100+ is a better choice for a SFF system. It runs 22W cooler than the P4 and Celerons discussed above. Undervolt it and it will run even cooler.

That's a great idea... she likely won't even notice any difference in performance, but you can bet she'll complain if its noisy... :rolleyes: (God forbid we build them free computers... just gotta complain...)
 
Back
Top