For those interested in using the ATI Control panel instead of the Catalyst Control center, I've made an interesting discovery today.
Instead of clicking Radeon on the ATI site, click FireMV, then Current drivers. This links you to a download page with the 6.3 catalyst drivers with the option of either the CCC or the Control panel!!
I've done a review at another site and tested these drivers, and am yet to find any faults, but instead major gains! (well 1 fault actually, the "average FPS" on Ati-Tool's 3D view went down by about 200... but other then that I can't seem to find any)
I actually receive higher FPS in games now without the Catalyst Control Center, making me sure to forever try and avoid it.
My Review:
Catalyst 6.3 + Chuck Patch: NO AA/AF +HDR



Catalyst 6.3 + Chuck Patch : 6XAA / 16XAF + HDR One of the Road images here is HQAF, But I can't remember which...




*FIRE MV CATALYST 6.3 DRIVERS* + Chuck patch: 6XAA / 16XAF + HDR




I can't personally tell a difference between the FIREMV 6.3 cats and the regular Radeon 6.3 cats. I also don't have an explanation for the higher frame rates?
Important! The FIREMV 6.3's use the Control Panel, instead of the Catalyst Control Center. The control panel doesn't have some of the options (that I don't use anyway) that the Catalyst Control Center does. Could it be the CCC has that big of an impact on performance? These could also be a great solution to people who dislike the CCC?
ALL tests were done with an AMD Athlon 64 3200+ OC'd to 2.4 Ghz, 2 GB of PC3200 ram OC'd to 480mhz DDR. Powercolor Radeon x1900xt OC'd to XTX speeds of 650/775.
Instead of clicking Radeon on the ATI site, click FireMV, then Current drivers. This links you to a download page with the 6.3 catalyst drivers with the option of either the CCC or the Control panel!!
I've done a review at another site and tested these drivers, and am yet to find any faults, but instead major gains! (well 1 fault actually, the "average FPS" on Ati-Tool's 3D view went down by about 200... but other then that I can't seem to find any)
I actually receive higher FPS in games now without the Catalyst Control Center, making me sure to forever try and avoid it.
My Review:
Catalyst 6.3 + Chuck Patch: NO AA/AF +HDR



Catalyst 6.3 + Chuck Patch : 6XAA / 16XAF + HDR One of the Road images here is HQAF, But I can't remember which...




*FIRE MV CATALYST 6.3 DRIVERS* + Chuck patch: 6XAA / 16XAF + HDR




I can't personally tell a difference between the FIREMV 6.3 cats and the regular Radeon 6.3 cats. I also don't have an explanation for the higher frame rates?
Important! The FIREMV 6.3's use the Control Panel, instead of the Catalyst Control Center. The control panel doesn't have some of the options (that I don't use anyway) that the Catalyst Control Center does. Could it be the CCC has that big of an impact on performance? These could also be a great solution to people who dislike the CCC?
ALL tests were done with an AMD Athlon 64 3200+ OC'd to 2.4 Ghz, 2 GB of PC3200 ram OC'd to 480mhz DDR. Powercolor Radeon x1900xt OC'd to XTX speeds of 650/775.