BFG 6800 ultra 512mb !!!

It's memory clock is slightly slower than a regular Ultra.

256MB Ultra Memory Clock 1100MHz

512MB Ultra Memory Clock 1050MHz

Ya think any current and "near" future games would take advantage of that extra 256MB?
 
PuckerFactor said:
It's memory clock is slightly slower than a regular Ultra.

256MB Ultra Memory Clock 1100MHz

512MB Ultra Memory Clock 1050MHz

Ya think any current and "near" future games would take advantage of that extra 256MB?

No. Plain and simple.

 
Nothing is fact in the PR computer world.

Doom 3 doesn't need 512 mb of memory for ultra, its a warning, just like the "suggested" specs on the bottom of the box. There are plenty of people that play on Ultra settings with some level of AA or AF. 512mb isn't going to help with the image settings either cause thats still limited by the clock, which is REDUCED on these cards.
All current and near release games are made from what we have now. There aren't any big name games on the immediate horizon. By the time a game comes out thats even going to touch the need for 512mb of memory you are going to need some Directx 10 or SM 4.0 bullshit.

This is the same way AGP 8X and PCI-express came around. We didn't even start using the bandwidth of AGP 8X and PCI-express was already adopted.

The hardware world always moves faster then the consumer software world.

 
Some people said 256 wasnt any better than 128. When in fact, in some games, at very high res' and with AA/AF it did make a big difference.

Im not saying its going to in every game, but there is a chance it will, with extreme settings. Myself and many others jumped on the new 2405FPW and it has 1920x1200. At that res, and 4xA/8xAF it may very well make a difference in some games. The point is, you dont know anything for a fact, yet. And since I cant seem to find any hardware sites that do reviews with such a res (some do a higher 4x3), we probably wont know until someone actually buys one, and tries.
 
It's memory clock is slightly slower than a regular Ultra.
thats actually a good thing because look at the memory bandwidth. The new memory at 1050mhz has higher bandwidth than the old memory at 1100mhz this must mean tighter memory timings :D
 
That...is a badass card...someday it will be mine...OH YES! Someday, it will be mine!
 
diablo111 said:
That...is a badass card...someday it will be mine...OH YES! Someday, it will be mine!

just wait a year and it will be yours for 200 bucks hehehe
 
You wont see that much of an improvement, considering the specs are even a little bit lower...
 
how are they lower...the memory may have a slower frequency but it still has more bandwidth due to tighter timings
 
PuckerFactor said:
It's memory clock is slightly slower than a regular Ultra.

256MB Ultra Memory Clock 1100MHz

512MB Ultra Memory Clock 1050MHz

Ya think any current and "near" future games would take advantage of that extra 256MB?
They still don't take the full advantage of 128Mb of memory, so I'd doubt it.
 
MeanieMan said:
Nothing is fact in the PR computer world.

Doom 3 doesn't need 512 mb of memory for ultra, its a warning, just like the "suggested" specs on the bottom of the box. There are plenty of people that play on Ultra settings with some level of AA or AF. 512mb isn't going to help with the image settings either cause thats still limited by the clock, which is REDUCED on these cards.
All current and near release games are made from what we have now. There aren't any big name games on the immediate horizon. By the time a game comes out thats even going to touch the need for 512mb of memory you are going to need some Directx 10 or SM 4.0 bullshit.

This is the same way AGP 8X and PCI-express came around. We didn't even start using the bandwidth of AGP 8X and PCI-express was already adopted.

The hardware world always moves faster then the consumer software world.



No im quite sure it has some visual advantage at Ultra when its cacheing it all it all on the card. Sure you can turn it on with any card and play the game, but im pretty sure its not actually doing a damn thing going from high to ultra unless you have the hardware support and the game detects it. Have to find out.

Anyway, the MSRP to start is going to be $1200.00 or something rediculous. Its a good thing they doubled the most expensive component. First person to get 2 for SLI gets branded the village idiot.
 
cell_491 said:
how are they lower...the memory may have a slower frequency but it still has more bandwidth due to tighter timings

What ARE you saying? :confused:

Lets do the math: 6800 Ultra 512MB @ 1050Mhz = (1050 / 8 ) * 256 = 33.6GB/s
6800 Ultra 256MB @ 1100Mhz = (1100/ 8 ) * 256 = 35.2GB/s

Where is this higher bandwidth you are talking about? It even SAYS 33.6GB/s on the website.
 
LOL your right i thought it said 36.3 lol. anyway i wouldnt buy it or a sli setup so i dont care. sorry for the aisxelsid
 
Shifra said:
No im quite sure it has some visual advantage at Ultra when its cacheing it all it all on the card. Sure you can turn it on with any card and play the game, but im pretty sure its not actually doing a damn thing going from high to ultra unless you have the hardware support and the game detects it. Have to find out.

Anyway, the MSRP to start is going to be $1200.00 or something rediculous. Its a good thing they doubled the most expensive component. First person to get 2 for SLI gets branded the village idiot.

If the settings are enabled the cards work towards it, the game just doesn't decide what to and not to show you. Just like the other settings, pre-configs for your system. You could tell it to go High then uncheck everything untill its just at normal or low setting.

There are already people in the forums that have 1GB of SLI memory. I'd love to see you call a doctor a village idiot.

 
Entropy said:
What ARE you saying? :confused:

Lets do the math: 6800 Ultra 512MB @ 1050Mhz = (1050 / 8 ) * 256 = 33.6GB/s
6800 Ultra 256MB @ 1100Mhz = (1100/ 8 ) * 256 = 35.2GB/s

Where is this higher bandwidth you are talking about? It even SAYS 33.6GB/s on the website.
That's theoretical bandwidth, skippy. Does pc3200 really give you 3200mb/s bandwidth?
 
iddqd said:
That's theoretical bandwidth, skippy. Does pc3200 really give you 3200mb/s bandwidth?


Your point goes both ways, making his point still true.

 
I very much doubt myself that the 512mb version could have better memory performance than the 256 ;).
 
Back
Top