I just picked up one of the BFG 6800 OC cards on sale @ BB with the free games etc. Pretty nice overall - fast 3D like I expected.
I spend a lot of time in windows, chat rooms, forums
and like to have fast 2D as well. I've read about the driver tweaking NV and ATI have done to boost 3D marks and so on so I have come not to trust a lot of 3D benchmarks....
2D benchmarks, on the other hand, should be fairly standard right?
Long story short, I fired up Passmarks Performance Test 5 and tested my setup against other systems etc. I even ran my system with a few different video cards testing 2D performance.... here were the results I ended up with:
I had a Parhelia and a 9500 Pro - both were nearly equal in 2D performance, the 9500 Pro was slightly slower. My new 6800 was slower than both of these cards in 2D tests, and when compared to a 9700 Pro it got beat out by a huge margin (the ATI 9700 Pro was 3X faster.)
The 3D scores of the 6800 OC reflected huge gains compared to these other cards - as expected.
I called BFG and they had no clue other than it could be an issue with the board being out of spec with AGP standards or an old BIOS. ASUS denied any issues with AGP, and verified I'm running the latest BIOS... Latest NV drivers as well.
Are these figures accurate? Does this card just kick ass in the 3D arena and become a serious slacker in the 2D arena?
I'll be grabbing an ATI 8500 soon to run more tests... I read that this was one of the last, fast, 2D cards around...
Any feedback is appreciated.
I spend a lot of time in windows, chat rooms, forums
2D benchmarks, on the other hand, should be fairly standard right?
Long story short, I fired up Passmarks Performance Test 5 and tested my setup against other systems etc. I even ran my system with a few different video cards testing 2D performance.... here were the results I ended up with:
I had a Parhelia and a 9500 Pro - both were nearly equal in 2D performance, the 9500 Pro was slightly slower. My new 6800 was slower than both of these cards in 2D tests, and when compared to a 9700 Pro it got beat out by a huge margin (the ATI 9700 Pro was 3X faster.)
The 3D scores of the 6800 OC reflected huge gains compared to these other cards - as expected.
I called BFG and they had no clue other than it could be an issue with the board being out of spec with AGP standards or an old BIOS. ASUS denied any issues with AGP, and verified I'm running the latest BIOS... Latest NV drivers as well.
Are these figures accurate? Does this card just kick ass in the 3D arena and become a serious slacker in the 2D arena?
I'll be grabbing an ATI 8500 soon to run more tests... I read that this was one of the last, fast, 2D cards around...
Any feedback is appreciated.