rickshobbies
n00b
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2004
- Messages
- 4
I have a P4 3.06Ghz 533FSB machine and I am choosing between the BFG 6800 GT and the BFG 6800 Ultra.
From what I have read so far, it looks like on my machine, the cards will perform the same because I am CPU limited. At best, I am seeing a 7fps difference in favor of the Ultra.
I mostly play games at 1024x760 or 1280x1024 and want to use 4xAA and 8xAniso with all options turned on in games like FarCry, Battlefield Vietnam and upcoming Doom3 and HL2. I do not like to overclock, so I want to use stock speeds which partly why I chose BFG since the are factory overclocked.
I was hoping someone might know of some good reviews that show benchmarks between the two cards, especially with minimum fps and not just average. I don't think the 7fps will be noticable unless it shows up at the minimum fps. For me, there is $150 difference between the two cards so I need to make sure it's worth it before I go for the Ultra. The GT might make more sense.
If anyone can point me to some reviews that consider minimum fps between the cards, that would be great. I would also welcome anyone's comments who might have direct experience as well.
I have gotten some feedback on another forum and received some great feedback, but most people suggest overclocking which is something I want to avoid. I guess I just don't want to risk such expensive hardware. I figured it couldn't hurt to ask you guys over here as well!
Regards,
R
From what I have read so far, it looks like on my machine, the cards will perform the same because I am CPU limited. At best, I am seeing a 7fps difference in favor of the Ultra.
I mostly play games at 1024x760 or 1280x1024 and want to use 4xAA and 8xAniso with all options turned on in games like FarCry, Battlefield Vietnam and upcoming Doom3 and HL2. I do not like to overclock, so I want to use stock speeds which partly why I chose BFG since the are factory overclocked.
I was hoping someone might know of some good reviews that show benchmarks between the two cards, especially with minimum fps and not just average. I don't think the 7fps will be noticable unless it shows up at the minimum fps. For me, there is $150 difference between the two cards so I need to make sure it's worth it before I go for the Ultra. The GT might make more sense.
If anyone can point me to some reviews that consider minimum fps between the cards, that would be great. I would also welcome anyone's comments who might have direct experience as well.
I have gotten some feedback on another forum and received some great feedback, but most people suggest overclocking which is something I want to avoid. I guess I just don't want to risk such expensive hardware. I figured it couldn't hurt to ask you guys over here as well!
Regards,
R