• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Best non WPA2 security?

taylorwilsdon

2[H]4U
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
2,286
My mom couldn't connect one of her computers to her new router, so she called me. After trying everything, I realized - the laptop was so old that it didn't support WPA2 security. Switching to WPA worked fine.

However, thats not secure enough by anyones count. People in her neighborhood are trying to jack wireless constantly. She has 5 computers and adds and removes them alot, so Mac address filtering is (tentatively) out of the question. Right now its set up to broadcast the session (incase other people want to use it and are allowed to) and WPA password protected.

The password is complex, but... yeah, its WPA. Anyone can crack it.

I'm looking for suggestions. She would have to be able to do them with me talking her through it over the phone, so rule physical access out.
 
Since when can anybody crack wpa? I was under the impression that wpa was good, wpa2 is better.

Now WEP sucks, true. So does mac filtering. More trouble than it's worth.
 
IMHO, it's best not to depend on a wireless router for security.

You could leave an open wap, hook the wap into a firewall and ONLY permit ipsec/vpn into your lan. Anyone who tries any thing else has a dead connection.
 
IIRC WPA is crackable (as I assume WPA 2 is). Only issue is time. On that note WPA2 is the best you can get and WPA would be number 2. Maybe setup a radius server to go with it?
 
Since when can anybody crack wpa? I was under the impression that wpa was good, wpa2 is better.

Now WEP sucks, true. So does mac filtering. More trouble than it's worth.

I was under the impression MAC filtering was one of the better options. Why not?
 
So far, WPA (PSK) is brute force only. An 8 character password would take 147 years to to find all possible combinations.

Using a randomized 63 character hex should put you up to "when the Sun goes Supernova"

Hope that's not a toll call.
 
WPA is fine, I normally use a short 5-10 word sentence as the passphrase so it will be easily recalled.
 
Back
Top