Best 24"

travbomb said:
Again I would say yes the 2490 is better than the 245T because the 2490 uses S-IPS and teh 245 uses S-PVA.

Also the 245T lacks pretty much all of the features the 2490 has including a 12 bit LUT, Colorcomp, Overdrive, 4 year warranty etc..
Click to expand...

The 245T comes a nice under 800$ and is TN panel, i can't understand why are people giving others advices if they don't know the right.
I maybe won't come again to this topic, don't have much time to read here, so theres no need to give any reaction to my post.

So if it won't have bad backlight bleeding and will be as fast as my 930BF, than it will be a great monitor, no matter what specifications.
 
I think that a forum is made for information and it a great place here and all the guys that answered my question is very nice and a lot more expert than me.
I duubt that the 245T will use a TN panel and if so... well for sure I will never buy a TN.
 
einer2060 said:
The 245T comes a nice under 800$ and is TN panel, i can't understand why are people giving others advices if they don't know the right.
I maybe won't come again to this topic, don't have much time to read here, so theres no need to give any reaction to my post.

So if it won't have bad backlight bleeding and will be as fast as my 930BF, than it will be a great monitor, no matter what specifications.
Click to expand...

Speaking of spreading misinformation and knowing what you're saying before you say something...


Samsung 245T (widescreen) has a 24 inch 6 ms (g2g) S-PVA (Samsung LTM240M2) panel.
Click to expand...

That's from this forum, and everything I've seen thus far also indicates that the 245T is a S-PVA panel, not a TN.
 
Rhydas said:
So travbomb NEC is better than Eizo cuz they use a better panel S-IPS instead S-PVA ?
I read that the 24" nec is not as good as the 26", and that many 26" have problem with noisy PSU

For those who consider the 24" (2490) version instead of 26" (2690)!

The LCD2490WUXi covers only 69% of the Adobe RGB, while its big brother LCD2690WUXi covers 91% of the Adobe RGB.

So, only difference with these won't be the diagonal size!

You can find this information here (by selecting the display model from the drop list):
http://www.necdisplay.com/products/C...etail.cfm?ID=1
Click to expand...

That link doesn't work. It looks like it was chopped off.
 
Hey its 1st April remember ;).
Yes your right, the 245 T is not TN, the 245 B will have TN :p . I see nobody take my I'm not coming back serious, good that i came back.
 
einer2060 said:
Hey its 1st April remember ;).
Yes your right, the 245 T is not TN, the 245 B will have TN :p . I see nobody take my I'm not coming back serious, good that i came back.
Click to expand...

LoL :D

anyway here in Italy it almost impossible to fine a shop and see with my eyes this monitor also here it cost > 1400, have 3 years warrany and no zero pixel faulty guarantee. I will wait some other review or comment in this forum, maybe a review form an hardcore gamers
 
travbomb said:
It is true that the 2490 covers less (of the Adobe RGB colour gamut) than the 2690 but the 2490 covers as much as any of those other models you mentioned in the original post.

Also the power supply issue has been resolved.

As far as 24 inchers go the 2490 will be the best one you can get. Gotta get S-IPS
Click to expand...

Er, no.

The EIZO covers 100% of the sRGB gamut and nearly all of the Adobe RGB gamut. That's why 1000's of professional publishing houses and others who care about colour use EIZO monitors.

It might have other limitations, but colour fidelity is one area where the EIZO monitor destroys the others the OP is considering.

Chip
 
Chippy said:
Er, no.

The EIZO covers 100% of the sRGB gamut and nearly all of the Adobe RGB gamut. That's why 1000's of professional publishing houses and others who care about colour use EIZO monitors.

It might have other limitations, but colour fidelity is one area where the EIZO monitor destroys the others the OP is considering.

Chip
Click to expand...

Most screens cover 100% of the sRGB gammut. Eizo screens (only the ColorEdge CG series/their S-IPS screens like CG221) covers 100% of the Adobe RGB gammut. Eizo screens like CE240W doesn't cover 100% of Adobe RGB, but it does 100% of sRGB like most screens.
 
Im also looking for a 24" widescreen monitor.
I've seen some monitors on a demo so I can add to the discussion - certainly where the Eizo 2410W/S2411W is concerned since thats one of my options.
Im weighing up the Eizo against the Benq 241W and the Dell 2407.

The Eizo 2410/2411 (S-PVA panel) is very impressive with regards to even backlighting and colour. its a very crisp display. The only thing that put me off is that when playing movies the overdrive circuit is a bit too agressive for my liking and (as per the behardware.com review) there is a lot of twinkling and shimmering. I dont know whether this overdrive function can be turned off.

Out of interest I compared that Eizo 2410 side-by-side with the Eizo L997 ( a more expensive 21" 4:3 monitor based on a hitachi IPS panel) and the L997 was even more impressive for colour and there was no twinkling/shimmering on movie playback.

I was hoping to find some info on the benq 241W movie playback. Behardware mentioned that the AU optronics panel had almost zero twinkling/shimmering for movie playback but their review of the benq241WZ was based on an early production S-PVA panel NOT the currently produced AU optronics MVA panel. can anyone comment on the benq 241W twinkling on movie playback?

Can anyone comment on the dell 2407 for twinkling on movie playback? PVA panels are notorious for this (as I saw with the Eizo 2410W)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top