redpoint13
n00b
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 28
Ok so for some reason im getting descent performance changes inbetween OS's and im not really sure why. The biggest difference is in the 3d Mark 01SE, so i dont really know what to think.
system:
ATI 9800XT
AMD64 3000+
ABIT KV8-MAX3
1 Gig stick of DDR400
ok so i first was running Longhorn beta 4074, with the catalyst 4.7 drivers.
Aquamark 3: 43,200~~ (or so i cant remember, just low 43 thousand)
3d Mark 01SE: 19,200~~ (or so...)
3d Mark 03: wouldnt run, something about a text file couldnt figure it out.
Then i switched to a beta Windows XP 64-bit that i DLed off microsoft. (running ATI's beta 64-bit drivers, couldnt get 4.7 to install) I didnt stay on this OS for long as Doom 3 wouldn't run.
Aquamark 3: didn't test
3d Mark 01SE: 16,300 or so.
3d Mark 03: didn't test
then i switched back to regular Windows XP with catalyst 4.7
Aquamark 3: 42,986
3d Mark 01SE: 17017
3d Mark 03: 6744
all tests were done on default settings with performance set in ati control panel.
Also i guess im curious if im even getting good scores for my hardware?
system:
ATI 9800XT
AMD64 3000+
ABIT KV8-MAX3
1 Gig stick of DDR400
ok so i first was running Longhorn beta 4074, with the catalyst 4.7 drivers.
Aquamark 3: 43,200~~ (or so i cant remember, just low 43 thousand)
3d Mark 01SE: 19,200~~ (or so...)
3d Mark 03: wouldnt run, something about a text file couldnt figure it out.
Then i switched to a beta Windows XP 64-bit that i DLed off microsoft. (running ATI's beta 64-bit drivers, couldnt get 4.7 to install) I didnt stay on this OS for long as Doom 3 wouldn't run.
Aquamark 3: didn't test
3d Mark 01SE: 16,300 or so.
3d Mark 03: didn't test
then i switched back to regular Windows XP with catalyst 4.7
Aquamark 3: 42,986
3d Mark 01SE: 17017
3d Mark 03: 6744
all tests were done on default settings with performance set in ati control panel.
Also i guess im curious if im even getting good scores for my hardware?