BCLK vs Multiplier Overclocking

psnco

n00b
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
11
I currently have an i5-6500. With the price drops on the skylakes, I was looking at upgrading to an i5 or i7 K version.

The motherboards I was looking at were:

http://www.microcenter.com/product/455508/Z170M_Mortar_LGA_1151_mATX_Intel_Gaming_Motherboard

or

http://www.microcenter.com/product/467908/C7Z170-M_LGA_1151_mATX_Intel_Motherboard_with_USB_31

Both appear to only be able to overclock using BCLK and NOT adjusting the multiplier.

So, if I chose either motherboard, would I really notice a difference between a i5-6500 and an i5-6600k?
 
The MSI Z170M Mortar and the Supermicro boards both allow BCLK overclocking thru the bios I've found. My question is.... Isn't overclocking via multiplier easier and "safer/more reliable" of a system? Or is this a misconception I have? I like the idea of a mATX board for the system I want to put together for my wife. She games (Not hardcore) and she'll use it for work (administrative/clerical work). I wanted a smaller case, but wanted a bit more than a mITX board/case has to offer. Thus I also though the i5 would be just fine.
 
Basically BCLK will also overclock uncore, memory (you may need to drop memory multiplier down, but that's hardly an issue) and basically disable AVX.
 
Don't forget if you decide ahead of time to o/c via BCLK you don't need a K series chip. Personally I would get one to keep all my options open though.
 
Back
Top