Negative Decibel
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2005
- Messages
- 3,588
so, where's the official link to download??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good question. But think about this, when you download the beta from MSDN there is already a hotfix available to correct and issue with MP3 file corruption. Also there is a posting instructing people to backup all media files that might be accessed by Windows Media Player. I think they might be incorporating the fixes into the public release. Media file corruption is a big deal and while most of us would probably not attempt an install of a beta OS with out precious data drives attached, average Joe would. While this is beta, the general public won't treat it that way and will nit pick, very vocally I think. The public release needs to be as close to perfect as possible. Hopefully they'll pull it off.so, where's the official link to download??
so, where's the official link to download??
Good question. But think about this, when you download the beta from MSDN there is already a hotfix available to correct and issue with MP3 file corruption. Also there is a posting instructing people to backup all media files that might be accessed by Windows Media Player. I think they might be incorporating the fixes into the public release. Media file corruption is a big deal and while most of us would probably not attempt an install of a beta OS with out precious data drives attached, average Joe would. While this is beta, the general public won't treat it that way and will nit pick, very vocally I think. The public release needs to be as close to perfect as possible. Hopefully they'll pull it off.
That sucked.
So I take it you paid the $400 for Vista Ultimate when it came out, and will be dropping the extra $200-400 Win7 will likely cost when it comes out later this year, then?i vote this for worst post of the year for 09 while my elbows are on the table and my face is buried in my palms
cmon dude... your post is exactly what im talking about.
Right, and Microsoft was fucking over their customers back then, too. Windows 98 offered some improvements over 95, but not a ton - and it was clearly released before it was ready by virtue of 98SE following soon after. SE was basically 98 SP1. The way I'm looking at it, Win7 is Vista SP2; except, they're charging full price for it (I assume).You must be new to the computer scene. Think of how many years between Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows 2000's releases, and then read your post again. That's not even counting the OEM Service Releases, Windows 98SE, or Windows Me (and I left out NT because it wasn't mainstream).
Windows Vista (regardless of my opinion of it) is the EXCEPTION for Microsoft in how long it took to release it, not the rule. If it had been released on time, Windows XP would have only been out for 3-4 years before its release.
That said, I'd honestly prefer that Microsoft had a 5-year OS cycle, provided they could get things right the first time.
Right, and Microsoft was fucking over their customers back then, too. Windows 98 offered some improvements over 95, but not a ton - and it was clearly released before it was ready by virtue of 98SE following soon after. SE was basically 98 SP1. The way I'm looking at it, Win7 is Vista SP2; except, they're charging full price for it (I assume).
There wasn't a 'jump' of only 2 years between 98 and Win2000, as 2000 was never intended (at least, not initially) for home use. When Microsoft's products said 'Professional' back then, they meant it. So the jump to 2000 wasn't from 98, but rather, from NT4 - which is an acceptable product cycle. The "real" successor to 98SE was ME. I haven't found a single person that doesn't agree that ME was MS's most famously failed OS abortion.
To sum up: I was honestly willing to defend Vista SP1 as a good operating system, and was willing to accept that Microsoft's decisions about its UI and usability were the result of honest, tested engineering decisions. By releasing a new OS so soon after, they are acknowledging - to me - that the UI in Vista was cobbled together just to get it out the door and make some more money. Now they're releasing Win7 which, based off the previous logic, is Vista the way it would have been if they didn't release it just to make some more money - and coincidentally, since it's a new OS, they get to make even more money.
It just seems like it's screwing over the people who dropped the exorbitant amounts they were asking for the top levels of Vista, IMO.
Sounds like a problem easily fixed. I hope more people with your situation made it known to MS. But then again who has 3 LCD hookups? Was that their target market? Maybe you need to manage your expectations better?I downloaded Windows 7 (x86) last night via my MSDN Premium account and installed it in VMWare 6.5. I must say that I was totally underwhelmed. I absolutately _loathe_ the new taskbar. And, as far as I can tell, there's no way to switch back to a "classic" taskbar style.
Also, why oh why, won't Microsoft wise up and let us specify a location for the taskbar. I run a triple head rig (via a TripleHead2Go) and I don't understand why they insist on left justifying the taskbar. If I could center the taskbar to my center monitor, then I'd see a huge productivity and ergonomics increase.
I'm going to play with it again tonight, but so far I think I'm just going to skip Windows 7 altogether.
yeah Ford was fucking me over when I bought my Taurus new in 2002 and they came out with a 2003 model. And don't get me started on AMD. I bought a fucking Athlon 64 x2 5000+ and a couple months later the Phenom came out. These people are royally fucking us over man.. Man, you know? And my GeForce 8800 GTS? Whew. I mean they came out with the 9xxx series a year later! Someone shoot the CEO of nVidia!
We're not allowed to get better and evolve! We have to be perfect from the onset! We're being screwed over by everyone!
Nice fallacies.yeah Ford was fucking me over when I bought my Taurus new in 2002 and they came out with a 2003 model. And don't get me started on AMD. I bought a fucking Athlon 64 x2 5000+ and a couple months later the Phenom came out. These people are royally fucking us over man.. Man, you know? And my GeForce 8800 GTS? Whew. I mean they came out with the 9xxx series a year later! Someone shoot the CEO of nVidia!
We're not allowed to get better and evolve! We have to be perfect from the onset! We're being screwed over by everyone!
Sounds like a problem easily fixed. I hope more people with your situation made it known to MS. But then again who has 3 LCD hookups? Was that their target market? Maybe you need to manage your expectations better?
many people have triple monitors -- software developers, graphic artists, engineers, accountants.
Microsoft wants to claim that they are friendly to these demographics, yet horribly botch the ergonomics of such configurations. Aside from being an annoyance, needing to constantly move your head to the left when you click on the taskbar is an ergonomics nightmare.
Linux handles this natively in every available window manager and Mac OS X automatically centers the dock in the center of the display. Windows is the only major OS which hasn't gotten religion on this yet.
However, I wouldn't have fucking known that there would be a Windows 7 2 years ago when Microsoft was saying Vista was their best OS ever and totally worth the $400, now would I have?
I'm a noob because I have a cynical opinion regarding the substantiveness of improvements between Vista SP1 and Win7, as well as Microsoft's motivations for the product cycles of Vista and Win7? Motivations which have been demonstrably proven with previous versions of Windows to be less focused on benefiting their customers than they maintained at the time? In order for you to be able to call me that, clearly you must be less of a noob - and therefore more experienced - than I am. So what are your credentials? Go ahead, dawg, let's see your ePenis.- There's a shiny light in the middle of all the noob darkness.
Like I said, sounds easily fixable. I didn't mean to sound patronizing either. If that is your only major beef with it than you seem to be in a good position. Your major beef is something that can be easily fixable, maybe. I would be optimistic.Linux handles this natively in every available window manager and Mac OS X automatically centers the dock in the center of the display. Windows is the only major OS which hasn't gotten religion on this yet.
I'm a noob because I have a cynical opinion regarding the substantiveness of improvements between Vista SP1 and Win7, as well as Microsoft's motivations for the product cycles of Vista and Win7?
Could you please rephrase that in a manner that makes slightly more than absolutely no sense?No you are noob because you have a guilty conscience. And no, you cannot see my penis.
Could you please rephrase that in a manner that makes slightly more than absolutely no sense?
Would you ask the same question of Apple and why they don't remove QuickTime and iTunes from OSX? I wonder...
Yes, you can delete iTunes rather easily but QuickTime is a bit more hooked into the system, and since the damned OS is written with those tools/utilities in mind, you're effectively crippling it by mucking with it.
Why do people continue to bash Microsoft for WMP? I don't get it... geez, ...
...if you want an OS with absolutely nothing in it and you add precisely what you want from nothing to exactly the machine and OS you desire, go mess with Linux From Scratch.
You're right. Your response to a guy who quoted me-and only-in his post obviously carried no implication towards me whatsoever. I do just have a guilty conscience about my noobness, and my substandard schooling. Wait, you didn't say anything about my schooling being substandard, did you? You only mentioned it within a context that I assumed was derogatory. Clearly, no subtext was implied on your part, and my schooling is just one more area in which I have a "guilty conscience." That and my "noobness."Jesus, your schooling.. I dunno. I said guilty conscious, ok? I never said YOU were a noob. I never directed anything to YOU specifically, just the overall noob stuff that has been posted in this thread. I also was just stating my appreciative amusement towards the post Azhar made. So since I never directed anything personally to you, you took it upon yourself to call yourself a noob. Hence a guilty conscious. You got it? Does it make sense to you now? Next time don't come to a battle of wits unarmed...
i never had that problem with either vista version (x86/x64)
so thats a firm NO
You're right. Your response to a guy who quoted me-and only-in his post obviously carried no implication towards me whatsoever. I do just have a guilty conscience about my noobness, and my substandard schooling. Wait, you didn't say anything about my schooling being substandard, did you? You only mentioned it within a context that I assumed was derogatory. Clearly, no subtext was implied on your part, and my schooling is just one more area in which I have a "guilty conscience." That and my "noobness."
The irony, it staggers the fucking mind.
On more important things. Anybody see a download link on that website. i check it every couple of minutes but maybe my "noob" eyes can't find it. We have a decent network at work and I want to use it while I can. I don't have a MSDN account or whatever so i can't use that partner site. So anyone have any luck?
many people have triple monitors -- software developers, graphic artists, engineers, accountants.
Microsoft wants to claim that they are friendly to these demographics, yet horribly botch the ergonomics of such configurations. Aside from being an annoyance, needing to constantly move your head to the left when you click on the taskbar is an ergonomics nightmare.
Linux handles this natively in every available window manager and Mac OS X automatically centers the dock in the center of the display. Windows is the only major OS which hasn't gotten religion on this yet.
no idea wtf u are saying in your follow up post though... i'd recommend an english 101 class
Sounds like a problem easily fixed. I hope more people with your situation made it known to MS. But then again who has 3 LCD hookups? Was that their target market? Maybe you need to manage your expectations better?
many people have triple monitors -- software developers, graphic artists, engineers, accountants.
Microsoft wants to claim that they are friendly to these demographics, yet horribly botch the ergonomics of such configurations. Aside from being an annoyance, needing to constantly move your head to the left when you click on the taskbar is an ergonomics nightmare.
Linux handles this natively in every available window manager and Mac OS X automatically centers the dock in the center of the display. Windows is the only major OS which hasn't gotten religion on this yet.
This is a joke, right? You do realize you can customize where each display "is" in terms of the virtual/physical arrangement of the monitors, right? You do know you can define the primary monitor and make that where the Taskbar always is, right?
I don't know whether to laugh at those comments or... ok, guess I'll laugh.
sometimes grammar isnt the problem, and what one says is so obfuscated, confused, or otherwise unclear that just by speaking/writing, a person *fails*
case in point, your posts
only the 2nd person to go on my ignore list (1st was a scammer)
Maybe it'd dirty diaper time!Don't forget the Desitin!!!!
Sounds like a problem easily fixed. I hope more people with your situation made it known to MS. But then again who has 3 LCD hookups? Was that their target market? Maybe you need to manage your expectations better?
This is a joke, right? You do realize you can customize where each display "is" in terms of the virtual/physical arrangement of the monitors, right? You do know you can define the primary monitor and make that where the Taskbar always is, right?
I don't know whether to laugh at those comments or... ok, guess I'll laugh.
this is a joke, right? you do realize that a TripleHead2Go exposes itself as ONE monitor that is as wide as the three client monitors combined. So, for my rig, Windows thinks that there is only ONE monitor attached and that it has a resolution of 5040x1050.
Next time, before you run your mouth make sure it's not getting ahead of your ass.
this is a joke, right? you do realize that a TripleHead2Go exposes itself as ONE monitor that is as wide as the three client monitors combined. So, for my rig, Windows thinks that there is only ONE monitor attached and that it has a resolution of 5040x1050.
Next time, before you run your mouth make sure it's not getting ahead of your ass.
This is a joke, right? I run backwards!