![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
ATI Drivers
- Thread starter [FX]Roman
- Start date
BillLeeLee
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2003
- Messages
- 13,486
I haven't yet, but my friend says his game developer club buddies say the 4.3s aren't that great.
I'm still using the Omega Catalyst 4.2s, haven't given me a problem yet.
I'm still using the Omega Catalyst 4.2s, haven't given me a problem yet.
llsardonicll
Weaksauce
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2002
- Messages
- 81
I haven't noticed a diffrence at all between 4.2s and 4.3s.
There was alittle drop in performance when i went to the 4.3. I reverted back to the 4.2 for now. 4.3 still didnt fix the gamma problem with most opengl games. So i thought that ill stick with the 4.2 till they fix the gamma.
I lost about 500pts or so in 3dmark2001 and about 15 in 3dmark2003. I didnt notice any increases in anything. Even the ones ATI claimed to have fixed. (Mother nature increases, etc etc.)
I lost about 500pts or so in 3dmark2001 and about 15 in 3dmark2003. I didnt notice any increases in anything. Even the ones ATI claimed to have fixed. (Mother nature increases, etc etc.)