• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

ATA100 vs SATA

M

Mojo

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Jan 28, 2003
Messages
1,569
100mbps vs 150mbps. That's the only difference right? SATA is loads programs 1.5 times quicker, correct?
 
Originally posted by Snugglebear
No & no, read the sticky on advanced HDD issues.
Click to expand...

:eek:

dont you mean As the Disk Spins @ Lost Circuits?

it would take the better part of a year to read all the Advanced HDD Issues thread (and links ) :p

there is effectively no performance difference between the two currently, slight advantages in efficiency (depending on the chipset and HDD) potential advantages to data integrity if implemented properly (see the Caution sticky)

niether a single PATA or SATA HDD can saturate either interface
depending on the HDD being 60 to 30 MB/s Sustained Transfer Rate (600 to 300Mbps just as the interfaces are 1000Mbps\100MB/s and 1500Mbps\150MB/s respectively and those are simply burst rates)
for the quick answer
As the Hard Disc Spins Chapter III: Effective Host Transfer Rates Interface Speed as Basis for Classification
but in truth you should really start at the beginning ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top