AT&T Getting Ready to Offer Skinny TV Streaming Package for $15

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by DooKey, Apr 20, 2018.

  1. DooKey

    DooKey [H]ard DCOTM x4

    Messages:
    7,822
    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    During his recent testimony in the AT&t/Time Warner antitrust trial, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson mentions a new skinny streaming TV option without sports is going to be offered for $15 a month. Wireless customers will get the best deal....free. Even though AT&T already offers a $35 per month service with DirecTV Now it appears they feel the need to tap into the low cost market and give everyone something for a pretty low price. Seeing is believing they say and once it's out I'll believe it.

    Called AT&T Watch, it would ditch sports to keep the price low, and be available for free to the company's wireless subscribers. There's no word on exactly what channels would be included but it's apparently going to launch in the next few weeks. At that price it would be cheaper than AT&T's lowest-price DirecTV Now package ($35 for 60+ channels) and Sling TV's cheapest lineup ($20 for 25+ channels).
     
  2. Master_shake_

    Master_shake_ [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,230
    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    They have those in Canada and they are a fucking joke.

    Be prepared to pay a lot for a little.

    Edit: Whoops thought it was cable TV
     
    jnemesh likes this.
  3. Bigbacon

    Bigbacon [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    15,500
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    step in the right direction finally offering things WITHOUT sports. sports is most of the reason TV is so expensive.
     
  4. jnemesh

    jnemesh [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,084
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    If you pay ONE RED CENT for video programming infested with advertising, you are paying TOO MUCH!
     
    craigdt, jlbenedict, WhoMe and 10 others like this.
  5. Nauseous

    Nauseous Gawd

    Messages:
    865
    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2004
    sports is the only reason i still watch tv.
     
    craigdt and OnceOver like this.
  6. [21CW]killerofall

    [21CW]killerofall Aliens...

    Messages:
    2,791
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Same. I can get all of my sports streaming online but the motion clarity just isn't quite there yet.
     
    craigdt likes this.
  7. JSumrall

    JSumrall Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    295
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2011
    Do not be surprised if they offer a $15 option, and then require you to have their most expensive unlimited cellular plans to qualify for it. This IS AT&T we're talking about.
     
  8. mord

    mord Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    377
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2005
    I'm on the other end. I dont watch any sports at all.
     
  9. leathco016

    leathco016 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    158
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2017
    This might work for me, as I am already on ATT and on their max family plan, so a free streaming option might be pretty cool
     
  10. nutzo

    nutzo [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,371
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2004
    Same here. I wish I had the option of a package without all the sports channels.
     
  11. c3k

    c3k 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,079
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2007
    A la carte or die.
     
    craigdt likes this.
  12. Spidey329

    Spidey329 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,677
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2003
    $15 and it's probably just the channels you'd get with free-OTA.
     
    craigdt likes this.
  13. OnceOver

    OnceOver n00b

    Messages:
    31
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2017
    Plus, OTA will most likely have better picture quality (PQ). PlayStation Vue has slightly better PQ form the streaming services I tried (DTV Now, PS Vue, and Sling TV) and OTA still looks appreciably better. I can stream live TV over my network with my HDHomerun connect to any device. The antenna is 4k ready (when that happens). If it wasn't for premium sports channels...
     
    craigdt likes this.
  14. jedijeb13

    jedijeb13 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    302
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2017
    Two things I never watch and wish they got rid of on DirecTV, sports and shopping channels. As long as it has History, SyFy, Science Channel, some news and maybe FX or TNT or AMC then I would be happy at $15/month. Pretty much paying $100/month now for just those.
     
    DooKey likes this.
  15. opfreak

    opfreak Gawd

    Messages:
    755
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2005
    how long until you bitch a la carte is too expensive?
     
  16. rudy

    rudy [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,519
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2004
    I think people are missing the point, when data took off on cell phones eventually carriers realized nothing would stop people from using data to achieve all phone features cheaper. Get it? So charging for texting or calling did not make any sense once critical mass is hit. So phone carriers realized that they had no play if people stopped using all calling and texting features. So they were forced to give that away free to keep people using it. Get it? Same thing is happening now to TV, now that video streaming has hit critical mass. So TV providers are going to have to give it away free or very cheap to keep you from cutting the cord.
     
  17. Uvaman2

    Uvaman2 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,962
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    and free it should be... should have been free years ago, with the horrendous amount of ads they place. cable is a freaking assault to the senses, and then an assault to the pocket on top of it. cable as it is, sports as they are have only one choice be free to be watched , and pass the cost to the advertisers, the era of double dipping is over.
     
  18. c3k

    c3k 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,079
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2007
    I don't know. Until it's offered to customers, the "packages" are ridiculous. I've got several choices; a small local provider gives "basic" for $25. The next step? That's $100. Basic just repeats the OTA channels. Glad I cut the cable.

    I was around when cable was rolled out. In exchange for paying for service, it was ad-free. Now? Yeah.
     
  19. Uvaman2

    Uvaman2 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,962
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    Cable was ad-free!?
    Well I read this:
    https://www.nytimes.com/1981/07/26/arts/will-cable-tv-be-invaded-by-commercials.html
    Wow.
    Cable is so ad-laden... its worse than FM!
    In fact if FM didn't repeat songs so much it would be borderline great!, free, cheap barrier of entry, and many station play big blocks of music (granted it gets a bit worse around X-mas but whatever)

    Why, why, anyone pays for this cable shit!?, just why!?
     
  20. Crosshairs

    Crosshairs Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    23,286
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    I remember those days.....
     
  21. harvestor

    harvestor [H]Lite

    Messages:
    120
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Sports are the only reason to watch live tv, if i wanted a tv package the local provider will give me a bundle thats only 19$ more then just internet which is bullshit but my only option
     
  22. Verge

    Verge [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,113
    Joined:
    May 27, 2001
    Clearly stated in the article it would be free for those users.
     
  23. WhoMe

    WhoMe Gawd

    Messages:
    827
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2018
    I don't suppose this will include those of us with data only plans? I could see one use for this (if free)...to check out a show I might be interested in buying on disc later as there is no OTA or cable here...and I'm assuming it wouldn't count against your data cap.
     
  24. Nytegard

    Nytegard 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,074
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2004
    I purposely schedule gym time around sports for this reason. The ones I've gone to typically carry all the sports channels.
     
  25. DTN107

    DTN107 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,727
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    No sports?

    15 channels? Can I assume they are 15 shitty networks that no one wants?

    Lifetime? QVC? The Spanish soap opera network that has the same guy that narrates the intros and all the commercials?
     
    craigdt and mord like this.
  26. Rabid_Platypus

    Rabid_Platypus n00b

    Messages:
    26
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    I have been using Philo for a month and so far so good - they don't do sports channels. Only downside for me is the lack of SyFy
     
  27. hmz

    hmz 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,018
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Shitty channels should be free.