Apple/Microsoft/Google Mobile Software Update Policy

lightp2

Gawd
Joined
Oct 28, 2009
Messages
672
Apple -
1. Pay Apple Tax. Yes confirm we take your money. Total device/voice/data/misc 2-year-contract cost is there.
2. Observe our structure and integration. iTune music/video/books/apps/magazine/apps/misc readily available.
3. The rest is taken care of. Software and commercial experience. No need to wonder. Software upgrades for one or two major versions, maybe three (Not forever, though). Minor software updates continuous. Plug your device into iTune and it will draw the newest update if needed.

Google -
1. Latest Android source is out. Check with your carriers and handset makers for latest firmware and other software updates.

2. For customer with iOS expectation, try to stick to Google Nexus line of devices. Hopefully more assurance of pure Google experience and more frequent software updates. Still under observation.

3. Else goto 3rd party ROMs. Need technical capability and will void your warranty. If you found a good combination of device/3rdpartyROM, you can get very long service years out of your Android phones with good hardware spec and continuous software updates. Your choice.

Eventually some will value 3rd party ROMs and their contribution, irrespective of the ideology.

Microsoft -
1. After observing both Google and Apple

1.1 Our part is done. It is up to the carriers now.

B Other types
B.1 Bada/WebOS/RIM/Symbian, see respective sites
B.2 Dumb phone - once sold, expect nothing.

The purpose is to make it extremely clear so there is no regret, or less regret per your expensive investment.

1. Some do suggest it is an expensive part of their daily life per SmartPhone/Tablets when total contract is involved.

2. You are not being forced to choose one over the other.

3. If you have objection, there are always alternatives, or switch to an entry-level dumb phone with zero expectation.

--- not directly comparable, just to illustrate a concept ---

1. Five and above Star Hotels - Meticulous attention to details for premium-paying guests. Expensive. Some are fine with the stay.
2. Three/Four star Hotels, maybe two and a half star as well - cover most of your functional and traveling needs just fine, most people will have comfortable stay.
3. Budget accommodation - Basic necessity is there. For other more demanding needs, check the convenience stores nearby or elsewhere. Affordable, it is.
4. No rating accommodation - you are on your own.

note : some companies operate chains in all categories to cover different segments of the market. Some only dealing in premium chain of Hotels.

Edit : in addition to the stated focus, the observation here is it is fairly natural in the daily life for such permutation. From there we understand there is no need to get overly emotional about certain choice. Just look at the Hotel examples. For Fortune 100 maybe they want premium avenue for official events. Other companies do just fine having functions at 4 or 3 star facilities. OTOH, employee of the same Fortune 100 company may instead go for budget hotel when planning for personal trip, so there is no fixation on "must". As long as it is practically reasonable, each chooses what one feels comfortable.

Also noted in the scenario of this thread, it is slightly more complicated. Even people having no intention of going Five-Star hotel may end up with one say they attend wedding function of others, so they do have great memory of the place. Same thing, maybe some never intend on iOS but received gifts for Apple products and got in touch with certain experience, so a simple description is not necessary enough.

The key point is to understand it is fairly natural and not fall into simple false categorization of thinking because X and you must be Y, because one and you must two, which is nonsense...
 
Last edited:
I dnt agree with Microsoft statement. Windows phone 7 is has been great when it comes to updates. Pretty much all wp7 devices in the states are up to date, on all carriers. Same can't be said for half the android devices out there.
 
Hi, aFive,

I understand your statement is correct per the US carriers.

Based on latest reports, for example,

http://www.theverge.com/microsoft/2012/1/6/2688354/windows-phone-updates-carrier-info-axed

Thus, I should clarify, as posted in various recent articles, Microsoft now

begin quote

Microsoft's latest Windows Phone update, build 8107, introduces some important bug fixes, including a security-related change to revoke a number of digital certificates. The update is "available to all carriers that request it,"

end quote

The part being "available to all carriers that request it"

back to 1st post, Microsoft "Our part is done., It is up to the carriers now"
 
That's a security update though, it is same as comparing android 2.3.4 to Android 2.3.7. Not all devices will get it, and all will be in between. However, even overseas, major updates are available to all wp7 handsets as Microsoft really is t wanting fragmentation. Outdated is version leads to major bugs and incompatible apps, security updates are different.
 
Back
Top