Anyone have a Viewsonic VP950b

MVA panel so nodding head won't distord colours and low enough backlight max brightness that there shouldn't be problems in adjusting brightness to convenient level.
http://www.viewsoniceurope.com/fi/Products/LCDProf/VP950b.htm
But dynamic fraud aka contrast should be disabled for consistent image quality and because of wider gamut it might not produce sRGB colours well.
Also panel having 6-bit colour accuracy (262k real colours) is bad news for getting accurate colours considering wider gamut.
 
Here is a review of the VP950b
http://www.biosmagazine.co.uk/rev.php?id=737


I noticed that Viewsonic is advertising "Zero Bright Dot" for their VP series of monitors (and I presume in their other lines too?)

> A safe investment – “Zero Bright Dot”
Improved regulation for addressing pixel/sub-pixel errors. VP950b customers can return their product within the DOA period -even if only a single sub-pixel is constantly bright on a dark background². (see below)

DigitalVersus wrote that sub-pixels (red, green, and blue) aren’t under warranty like black and dead white pixels in their review of a Viewsonic VX2435wm
http://www.digitalversus.com/article-357-2333-41.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
² DOA ( Dead on Arrival) timeframe for return is based of the fact that 99% of such types of sub-pixel errors result within a single normal thermo cycle (i.e. after the display has been on for a period, then off for a period and then on again: hot, cold, hot).

Anyone care to comment on what this "single normal thermo cycle" should mean to us?
Does it mean that it is normal to have a pixlel error when turning on, then off, then on again? Does it mean we shouldn't be doing this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top