Another PPD-List

T

Thomas R

Weaksauce
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Messages
110
I klnow - it´s only one from many.
But I created a PPD-List not only for big-Folders, but for all smp-, gpu- and big-folders.
It´s not my hope that all of you give in your results. But to compare different systems with different results, it is essential to enter the system data.
At the lower end of the table are three tabs. There you can change between smp, gpu and big.
At the GPU-Tab please give in your system an used driver-version as indicated in the results. Read the comments in "System" and "Driver-Version".
At bigadv. Please give in your system data as a comment.


If that is not interesting for you - OK.
Want to compare your results also - JOIN.

Thank you!

Link:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ap5lOkaO12jldG80aG03Z3BaNHI2czJ1YmZGaHVIeXc#gid=0
 
very nice - however you may want to contact 402Blownstroker as he currently has made/hosts a PPD database. A google doc was previously maintained for this same purpose, however it never worked out well for a group of reasons.
 
@jojo69
oooh

me wants some 7026
Click to expand...

Me too!!!:D



@ Grandpa
What the hell!
I never would have guessed that your i7 980x is faster than an i/ 3930k.
Frequency is higher - ok.
Still, I'm surprised that!
 
Thomas R said:
@jojo69


Me too!!!:D



@ Grandpa
What the hell!
I never would have guessed that your i7 980x is faster than an i/ 3930k.
Frequency is higher - ok.
Still, I'm surprised that!
Click to expand...

not surprising in SMP..
 
@ Grandpa

Are the i7 980x cooled with water?
The PPD results are truly amazing!
 
He leaves the windows open to keep the 980x and grandma operating at low core temps. :D

Oh yeah, the TPF of the 570 crunching an 8057 seems be very high, especially when compared to the overclocked 560ti. The gap in tpfs between the two cards folding looks right, though.
 
Last edited:
just added my 8057 results from my rig on the GPU page. hope it helps ;-)

edit: forgot to mention that my results are water cooled as well. if it makes a difference.
 
Thomas R said:
@ Grandpa

Are the i7 980x cooled with water?
The PPD results are truly amazing!
Click to expand...

Yes they are cooled with watter and the Windows are always open with a box fan exuasting out :D and they run 12GB of 2000Mhz ram @ 9-10-9-21-1T at 2006Mhz @ 1.55V

Here in another week or so it will be time to OC them 4.5+Ghz then they will really fly
 
@nuttcase21
Thanks for your input!
Can I also have a few results of your CPU on the smp page?


@Grandpa_01
I hope we find out your results at 4.5 GHz!
And you could not please enter your results of the GPU's?
Such high PPD values ​​I have nowhere seen somewhere else!!
 
Thank you guys!

One GTX580, one GTX470 and I can get the same PPD as my 4p rig.
Really confused..........
 
i don't think it is. i don't have any flags set to get beta smp units and i've gotten several of them over the last few weeks.
 
Are you sure the project number is 7089?
I can´t find it too in the folding-forums, beta section.
 
yes i'm sure it's project #7089. i uploaded a few more smp results too.

**edit**
i looked at my notes and it turns out i was wrong about the project #. the units i've been getting at 7809, NOT 7089. little typo there :)
i'll change the info on the spreadsheet as well. sorry.
 
Last edited:
@nuttcase
Please control your input at 7808 and 7809.
One of these are wrong.
I think 7808 ( PPD=366487 ) !!


@Granpa
I can´t fold with Core v2.22 on my GTX470.
Once I install the old core, the GPU is folding not more.
What is the trick?
 
entered some info from my 550ti. i'll check the numbers on the 7808 when i get another one folding.
 
Whats the issue? I'm not interested in editing the document, but I'll post results here if someone wants to add them.
 
The problem is that some people try to edit the table, but unfortunately have no idea.

Your suggestion to post the results here is good!
 
This should be all the information you need.

Code: 
 Project ID: 8057
 Core: OPENMMGPU
 Credit: 2549
 Frames: 100


 Name: 470 GTX
 Path: C:\Users\LeRoy\AppData\Roaming\Folding@home-gpu\
 Number of Frames Observed: 300

 Min. Time / Frame : 00:02:27 - 99,470.7 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:02:28 - 98,464.2 PPD
 Cur. Time / Frame : 00:02:29 - 97,474.7 PPD
 R3F. Time / Frame : 00:02:28 - 98,464.2 PPD
 All  Time / Frame : 00:02:29 - 97,474.7 PPD
 Eff. Time / Frame : 00:02:31 - 95,544.5 PPD

edit
looked at the list again and way too many uncoordinated colors. If they are coordinated, they look uncoordinated. haha

My system is in my sig. No overclocks.
 
Thomas R said:
@nuttcase
Please control your input at 7808 and 7809.
One of these are wrong.
I think 7808 ( PPD=366487 ) !!


@Granpa
I can´t fold with Core v2.22 on my GTX470.
Once I install the old core, the GPU is folding not more.
What is the trick?
Click to expand...

Some people are copy and pasting there info that does not work I fixed the ones I saw but you need to enter the data at the bottom of the page or make sure the formulas are there and correct after you copy and paste,


Thomas you should not be having a problem running 2,22 unless you are running a 76xx WU they do require the 2.25 core and once they complete it you can switch back to 2.22 ;)
 
jesus, who messed up the spreasdsheet? here's some more input from my 550ti thomas:

all units are 8057
550ti @ 1000/2274/2000

WU 8057 #1 tpf 3:32
WU 8057 #2 tpf 3:29
WU 8057 #3 tpf 3:28
WU 8057 #4 tpf 3:33

computer is 2500k @ 3.3Ghz 8Gb ram

fah version is 2.25. driver version is 306.97
 
Thank you guys.
I´m in hurry, because I have to start in 6 hours with the production.
Tomorrow I will enter all information from you.
 
here's some more units thomas. same 3930k specs as before. these are hand calculated for accuracy.

WU TPF
7645 9:25
8056 1:32
7024 1:28
8027 0:45
7025 1:41
7808 5:39
8068 1:27
8069 0:46
7647 10:02
7809 5:46
7001 1:54
10083 1:59
 
Those tpf's look right for 8068 and 8069, i had one yesterday on one of my rigs and it raced through it
 
HFM log for you - this is on my daily driver so massive variance due to gaming etc

Project ID: 8068
Core: GRO-A4
Credit: 197
Frames: 100


Name: Invincible SMP
Path: C:\Users\Nathan\Folding@Home\
Number of Frames Observed: 300

Min. Time / Frame : 00:00:48 - 36,620.1 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:46 - 11,158.9 PPD
Cur. Time / Frame : 00:01:11 - 20,026.7 PPD
R3F. Time / Frame : 00:01:11 - 20,026.7 PPD
All Time / Frame : 00:01:13 - 19,354.4 PPD
Eff. Time / Frame : 00:01:15 - 18,720.3 PPD


Please not that this continues to prove that core a3 work is more valuable from a points view than core a4 work on my machines
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top