Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shoot, even that guy that in a 3G network on an iPhone OUTSIDE THE APPLE STORE did a comparison video that showed how ridiculous the "fast" iPhone commercials were. Does anyone know what happened to that lawsuit?"Really fast".. Isn't the iPhone known to be really slow due to the sluggish ARM processor they used in combination with a poorly optimized OS? Apple's marketing team needs a reality check..both the one responsible for this and the one that does the stupid I'm a Mac ads.
QFT.I'm getting tired of all the commericals on tv that make claims that they can't live up to.
I don't think ANY 3G phone can load pages that fast. At least none I've seen on the market right now.The real question is, CAN the iPhone work that fast? I mean if you had the fastest 3G connection on Earth, can you get the pages to load like that? If you can, then it's just typical advertizing. If not, then it's deceptive.
Uh... Flat out falsifying web pages loading on the iPhone? Or how everything pops up instantly. Anyone that's even used the iPhone for 2 minutes knows that's a bunch of BS, hence the class action lawsuit awhile back.Any examples? I'm curious to what their standard is for "misleading".
In the US we let our people use their own minds to think and detirmine if it's good enough for them.
I'm going to start my own country. Who's with me?
It'd just get taken over or something...
Of the countries I'd love to move to, none of them have the real backbone to make it enjoyable for me (shopping centers to buy stuff at, decent internet speeds, entertainment, etc).
Any country that has plenty of that always has a downside to it.
It'd just get taken over or something...
Of the countries I'd love to move to, none of them have the real backbone to make it enjoyable for me (shopping centers to buy stuff at, decent internet speeds, entertainment, etc).
Any country that has plenty of that always has a downside to it.
This sums it up nicely:I think what this thread is lacking is a finite definition of what false advertising actually is. Anybody truly in the know care to fill that in?
There is a textual warning at the end of the ad that says something to the effect of:
"Actual phone speeds may vary with quality of network coverage."
Apple has done NOTHING different than 99% of other companies out there.
The network coverage has nothing to do with how fast the phone responds. Look at how fast their applications load compared to how fast they load in real life. I'm sorry but this ad is blatant false advertising. There are no ands ifs or buts about it. I know every product is slightly better in ads than they are in real life but this ad goes above and beyond by an extreme margin.There is a textual warning at the end of the ad that says something to the effect of:
"Actual phone speeds may vary with quality of network coverage."
Apple has done NOTHING different than 99% of other companies out there.
2 wrong don't make 1 right...
Deceptive ads that gets banned dosn't bother me...wanna sell your product, then do it on the merrits, not lies/deception.
But everybody knows that this ad was specifically targeted to leech from apple's successful iPhone earnings. Which I think is just as scummy as a misleading ad.
It's common in the EU to ban bad/misleading ads, are the US just open to BS-ads no matter what?![]()
First of all, what the hell got your panties in a wad? And second, he's right. The moment our government stepped in and stopped the ads some special interest group would open up the water works and controversy would ensue.Good job bringing your anti american rant to another topic. Now go over to the next camera watching you and tell the government you'll suck them dry.
There is a textual warning at the end of the ad that says something to the effect of:
"Actual phone speeds may vary with quality of network coverage."
Apple has done NOTHING different than 99% of other companies out there.
Yea, except your argument fails because no network or location out there can perform that fast, for starters.There is a textual warning at the end of the ad that says something to the effect of:
"Actual phone speeds may vary with quality of network coverage."
Apple has done NOTHING different than 99% of other companies out there.
The moment our government stepped in and stopped the ads some special interest group would open up the water works and controversy would ensue.
You know im all for apple getting ragged on and what not. They need to get there heads our of there asses and take of that ridiculous apple tax if they really want to be better than Microsoft to the whole world.
I myself have macs, pcs and servers so I have quite a few of the major OS's out there (mac, windows, linux).
Anyways, I think the UK was wrong in this sense. Apple was simple advertising how fast there phone could be in prime conditions. In a good 3G network area with good speeds, and probably a new phone without any clutter on it. So what.
What has this world come to, to not be able to realize that nothing is 100% correct. If you had a brand new iPhone 3G and were in a 3G hot spot you could probably get those types of results.
Apple was simple advertising that there phone could do this in the proper environment. None the less they said "Actual phone speeds may vary with quality of network coverage." That right there can clarify a lot.
In fact I know AT&T has maps of 3G coverage at their stores where you can get the phone. They want to let you know where those hot spots are and what not.
This world in general is starting to sicken me that we have to appoint idiots to inform idiots how idiotic they are...
Cant edit...
Anyways, It's just like how they advertise battery life on laptops, Most companies over exaggerate them because they just let it sit and run for the time of the battery putting no load on it and giving you a 4 hours time frame even though you will never get close to it when using it.
Apple on the other hand doing normal stuff, browsing the web, listening to music etc... you can get pretty darn close to the advertised mark. (i think the old MBP before the new release was marked at 4 hours or close to it.) I can get that normally, even on a bad day. Movies ill get around 2.5-3 just text (programming) i can get close to 6.
This is true. Heck it wasn't even 100 years ago, and Americans were ruthless consumers. It made America great. You pissed off the consumers, you went out of business. You lied to customers, you went out of business.The moment our government stepped in and stopped the ads some special interest group would open up the water works and controversy would ensue.
That's a standard though, which actually does make sense. Depending on the load, this could vary DRASTICALLY. The only thing uniform and the same for everyone is the base-load while it's running.Anyways, It's just like how they advertise battery life on laptops, Most companies over exaggerate them because they just let it sit and run for the time of the battery putting no load on it and giving you a 4 hours time frame even though you will never get close to it when using it.