Do supposedly good overclocking boards fudge by overvolting the vcore?
Exactly how accurate are vcore readings off the board's bios?
I've seen wildly different voltages reported here to produce the same speed & temps
that simply can't be explained by cooling solution alone.
Take my example:
2 different boards (Abit/Jetway) running CCBBE 165 Opterons at 2.8 ghz, same cooler,
same room, same case, same load temps of 53C, yet one needs just 1.4v to run
stable, the other needing 1.5v.
Can a poor 12v rail off the psu account for the undevolt?
"Yeah, my new board only takes 1.35v to hit 2.8."
Really?
I've seen alot of high temps reported by supposedly low vcores.
Exactly how accurate are vcore readings off the board's bios?
I've seen wildly different voltages reported here to produce the same speed & temps
that simply can't be explained by cooling solution alone.
Take my example:
2 different boards (Abit/Jetway) running CCBBE 165 Opterons at 2.8 ghz, same cooler,
same room, same case, same load temps of 53C, yet one needs just 1.4v to run
stable, the other needing 1.5v.
Can a poor 12v rail off the psu account for the undevolt?
"Yeah, my new board only takes 1.35v to hit 2.8."
Really?
I've seen alot of high temps reported by supposedly low vcores.