- Joined
- Dec 9, 2000
- Messages
- 16,216
Is it better to run the memory at 6400 with 1:2 divider on the memory controller, or 6000 with 1:1 ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
6000 1:1, as has been the case since the start.Is it better to run the memory at 6400 with 1:2 divider on the memory controller, or 6000 with 1:1 ?
exactly. Lower latency beats the small increase in transfer speed in this case.6000 1:1, as has been the case since the start.
There may be a few heavy productivity tasks that could benefit from a higher MT/s. So if you're in that particular group, you could test it and see for yourself and then decide which to do.
It’s all been done. Some googling will help. There are also online calculator tools to show you the differences. Latency beats speed in this case and actually in many cases. Why do you think ddr5 6000 cl30 1:1 is the still the sweet spot for performance with amd? There’s also some in depth YouTube videos explaining these relations.Any benchmarks?
You have to be at 8000 + for 1:2 to start showing small, consistant gains.Is it better to run the memory at 6400 with 1:2 divider on the memory controller, or 6000 with 1:1 ?
So better to be at 1:1 with a lower speed and timings.You have to be at 8000 + for 1:2 to start showing small, consistant gains.
it's Micron.You can probably go tighter on the timings if it's Hynix memory. Just finished stress testing 6000CL30 with low voltages and 2200 FCLK. G.Skill 6400C32 kit.
View attachment 721762
It's really easy to look it up:So it is 0.5-2.0% for 6000 vs 8000, but there's still no numbers for 6000 1:1 vs 6400 1:2?
https://www.google.com/search?q=ryz...e=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari&iga=1