• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

-advmethods -forcesse and -forceasm vs. not

’

’m‚³‚ñ

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
Jun 20, 2003
Messages
7,300
Since I have a dual CPU setup now, I was going to run one instance of F@H without the -advmethods, -forcesse, and -forceasm flags to see what difference they make, but since one CPU appears to be going a bit faster than the other, it doesn't seem like that would be smart. :p

Does anyone have ppd calculations showing the difference between using the advanced flags and not? Say, on a PII?
 
I dont have any exact figures but.....

An AMD will fold a Tinker at twice the speed of a PII.
An AMD with SSE will fold a Gromac at twice the speed of a Tinker.
A PII will fold a Gromac at about the same speed as an AMD.

So your probably looking at a 100 to 200% increase in PPD if you get Gromacs.
So use the flags.

Luck........:D
 
Originally posted by Tigerbiten
I dont have any exact figures but.....

An AMD will fold a Tinker at twice the speed of a PII.
An AMD with SSE will fold a Gromac at twice the speed of a Tinker.
A PII will fold a Gromac at about the same speed as an AMD.

So your probably looking at a 100 to 200% increase in PPD if you get Gromacs.
So use the flags.

Luck........:D
Click to expand...

lol alrighty, thanks. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top