Looking to replace my current data server that is 5 years old. Right now I am thinking either HP or IBM with 5-6 300 GB 10k drives in a RAID5 configuration for storage and 2 146 GB drives in a RAID1 configuration for boot. This is just based off my research, and I've never deployed a server before.
Total storage today: 450 GB
Total users: 50-55
Concurrent users: average 10-20
Budget constraints: $6500 for server, $5000 for backup
Server will hold: general files, user Docs redirect
As far as redundancy I am OK with the RAID5 volume, right? We are a mid sized company and we work primarily off email and phones, therefore I do not believe I need to have an immediate backup that is running 24/7.
This server will only handle data with Previous Versions (maybe a DC role as well) and it will be in folder form - no content management or databases or applications. It will be in my server room where I will have access 24x7 - not in a data center. It will be plugged into my 10/100/1000 network and it will run Windows Server 2008 R2. The clients will be running Windows 7 Professional.
Backup
Currently using Symantec Backup Exec 10d with an LTO2 drive (200/400 GB tapes) to back up the Windows Server 2003 data server, Exchange 2003, and the HR database.
I was thinking of going with Symantec Backup Exec 2010 with an LTO4 drive to back up the new data server. Folks have mentioned some Linux based stuff before but I am not comfortable with that and I have always used Backup Exec - therefore I am comfortable with it and unless there is another Windows-based backup solution I am not sure what else to use.
The new backup system will not be backing up Exchange because I am 99% sure we are going to go hosted for mail.
I've never deployed a new data server or a backup solution and I've had folks tell me that tape backup is a way of the past and that I should be looking at other options like disk backup. I've ruled out online backup because of the recurring cost, speed, and the fact that the data I need to back up is extremely simple to throw on a tape.
Technically I could stick with the current backup drive and tapes and just buy new Backup Exec software that will run on Windows Server 2008 R2 (Backup Exec 10d not supported) - the tape drive and tapes would hold the data, I would just have to do a tape swap. It's not ideal, but it is a money saver. That LTO2 is so damn slow I would love to replace it.
I would love your thoughts/opinions - if I have left anything out please ask away. Thanks!

Total storage today: 450 GB
Total users: 50-55
Concurrent users: average 10-20
Budget constraints: $6500 for server, $5000 for backup
Server will hold: general files, user Docs redirect
As far as redundancy I am OK with the RAID5 volume, right? We are a mid sized company and we work primarily off email and phones, therefore I do not believe I need to have an immediate backup that is running 24/7.
This server will only handle data with Previous Versions (maybe a DC role as well) and it will be in folder form - no content management or databases or applications. It will be in my server room where I will have access 24x7 - not in a data center. It will be plugged into my 10/100/1000 network and it will run Windows Server 2008 R2. The clients will be running Windows 7 Professional.
Backup
Currently using Symantec Backup Exec 10d with an LTO2 drive (200/400 GB tapes) to back up the Windows Server 2003 data server, Exchange 2003, and the HR database.
I was thinking of going with Symantec Backup Exec 2010 with an LTO4 drive to back up the new data server. Folks have mentioned some Linux based stuff before but I am not comfortable with that and I have always used Backup Exec - therefore I am comfortable with it and unless there is another Windows-based backup solution I am not sure what else to use.
The new backup system will not be backing up Exchange because I am 99% sure we are going to go hosted for mail.
I've never deployed a new data server or a backup solution and I've had folks tell me that tape backup is a way of the past and that I should be looking at other options like disk backup. I've ruled out online backup because of the recurring cost, speed, and the fact that the data I need to back up is extremely simple to throw on a tape.
Technically I could stick with the current backup drive and tapes and just buy new Backup Exec software that will run on Windows Server 2008 R2 (Backup Exec 10d not supported) - the tape drive and tapes would hold the data, I would just have to do a tape swap. It's not ideal, but it is a money saver. That LTO2 is so damn slow I would love to replace it.
I would love your thoughts/opinions - if I have left anything out please ask away. Thanks!
