• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Accurate temp core readings

flyinpolak

Limp Gawd
Joined
May 15, 2008
Messages
401
I need a good temp reader for the entire system.... looking for core temps not what speedfan reads as i know it can be off....


please let me know
 
all of them read the correct core temp sensor.. problem is none of them are "accurate" they are some what accurate within 1-5C.. but for intel realtemps your best option and for AMD coretemp is your best option.. and for full system temps speedfan is the best option for most light weight temp program..
 
I've run a few different programs, on my i5 they all read very different temperatures when the core temps are low (one could say 20C and another say 30C). But once things heat up above 40C they are all within 2-3C of each other.
 
I've run a few different programs, on my i5 they all read very different temperatures when the core temps are low (one could say 20C and another say 30C). But once things heat up above 40C they are all within 2-3C of each other.


yeah its a problem all intel processors have had since the C2D processors.. the idle temps are worthless and anything under 50C is inaccurate as heck.. theres a few posts over on realtemps forum from the devs talking about it.. i may try finding them later.. but from what i remember the i3/i5/i7 are even more inaccurate then the C2Q 45nm processors..
 
Back
Top