Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even after a few hours of BF3 or benchmarking I've never seen the VRM's much over 50c.

The VRMs on mine barely pass 38°C on a normal day, playing hours of BF3. Right now I've had mine mining away for the past 24 hours and it hasn't hit that mark yet.
Cool basement + waterblock + Gentle Typhoons on low speed =![]()
I've always had this issue with ATI cards... their VRM temps go crazy... I water cool using a core block and I'll have to stick a 120mm fan directly over the VRMs cause they get so hot. I quit using ATI cards after the 5870 but every ATI card I've had the VRMs would get extremely hot.


I've also installed the Accelero Xtreme on my 7970 but i barely pass the 55 degrees mark on the VRMs & 42 for the GPU after a 30 mins loop of Uningine or few hours of BF3
I really don't see any logical explanation for those with 100+ degrees besides a bad installation.
This is my naked 7970 with the Ram / VRM heatsinks.
![]()
Well so far as I can tell I installed it the same as pictured, The only variance could be the amount of thermal glue applied to the heatsinks or the airflow in the case. I currently put the old thermal tape from the reference card on the BACK of the card on the VRM area with the left over heat sinks, then added a 80mm fan running at a very low rpm (inaudible) blowing air away from the card and near the CPU. The VRM's and the temps dropped from 120C to 92C and from 85C to 65C respectively. Pretty awesome
Maybe try running furmark for 2-3 hours @ 1200mhz and check your temps![]()
Well so far as I can tell I installed it the same as pictured, The only variance could be the amount of thermal glue applied to the heatsinks or the airflow in the case. I currently put the old thermal tape from the reference card on the BACK of the card on the VRM area with the left over heat sinks, then added a 80mm fan running at a very low rpm (inaudible) blowing air away from the card and near the CPU. The VRM's and the temps dropped from 120C to 92C and from 85C to 65C respectively. Pretty awesome
Maybe try running furmark for 2-3 hours @ 1200mhz and check your temps![]()
That still seems awful hot. I just ran ungine maxed out settings for 20 minutes looping and the highest my VRM's saw was 58c with stock cooling and a custom fan profile. The highest fan speed was 50%. GPU max temp 68c.![]()
^^^ I understand what the VRM's are rated at. These gpu's are rated at over 90c as well. No way in hell I want mine running that hot. What worries me is that some of the temps reported by those using the Accelero kit are a good 40~50c higher than a stock cooler. If I'm going to drop $100 on a aftermarket cooler I'd expect better cooling. The Accelero kit achieves that for the GPU but is hit-n-miss on the VRM.
^^^ I understand what the VRM's are rated at. These gpu's are rated at over 90c as well. No way in hell I want mine running that hot. What worries me is that some of the temps reported by those using the Accelero kit are a good 40~50c higher than a stock cooler. If I'm going to drop $100 on a aftermarket cooler I'd expect better cooling. The Accelero kit achieves that for the GPU but is hit-n-miss on the VRM.
As i said before, there is either something wrong with some Accelero 7970 or perhaps a bad installation of the VRM heatsinks.
I am not exactly the type of person that switches aftermarket coolers everyday but i followed carefully the Accelero PDF manual and probably read every possible review on the web and here are the results, 45 degrees @ full while playing BF3 for 3 hours (the VRMs barely reach the 55 degrees mark).
^^^ I understand what the VRM's are rated at. These gpu's are rated at over 90c as well. No way in hell I want mine running that hot. What worries me is that some of the temps reported by those using the Accelero kit are a good 40~50c higher than a stock cooler. If I'm going to drop $100 on a aftermarket cooler I'd expect better cooling. The Accelero kit achieves that for the GPU but is hit-n-miss on the VRM.
It would be more helpful if you listed what Vcore and Mhz the clock is running at, as well as your case/airflow setup. When you use HWINFO what are your VRM#1/#2 temps?
Antec 1200.
The card is running @ 1200/1600 1116mv.
During BF3 sessions i've never seen the VRMs at more than 57 degrees.
In the other hand, i did run a few hours ago the FurMark Xtreme-Burn-In benchmark and they almost reached 115 degrees.
I have an Aplenphoen Peter 7970 GPU aftermarket cooler. One hour session on Withcher 2 and the GPU temperature was 57c, the VRMs were 86 and 67. Five minutes of Furmark brought them to 115c, so clearly Furmark = bad. I have known this for years, yet I still run it. I just uninstalled it, to remove any tempation to run it![]()
For me it was the last time i use it as a stability test, here in Israel is winter right now, if it was summer i'd have fried the card since the max safe temps for the VRMs are 120c right ?.
Antec 1200.
The card is running @ 1200/1600 1116mv.
During BF3 sessions i've never seen the VRMs at more than 57 degrees.
In the other hand, i did run a few hours ago the FurMark Xtreme-Burn-In benchmark and they almost reached 115 degrees.
Ahh, yes and that is what I am doing to get to those tempertures. I think the variance we see is what kind of load the GPU sees after hours of use. I'm sure my VRM temps while general gaming would be considerably lower, I've been benching worst case scenario's.
You are by admission lumping GPU temps and VRM temps together, ie 100c = fire. This is a very common mistake, but it is a non-sequitur. GPU core temps approach dangerous levels at 95c +, even stock coolers will attempt to keep them from going over this level.
By comparison VRM temps do not get to dangerous levels until around 115c, or even higher depending on the VRMs used. This is a full 20c + difference in max temperatures, so if you are getting 100c on your VRMs they are still within tolerances. The fact that Asus DCU II cards are getting 100c on the VRMs should be the big clue here.
To put it another way, if your GPU was getting 80c at 100% load, most people wouldn't bat an eyelid. This is the equivelant of a VRM hitting 100c, yet people think 100c VRM = housefire.
If the VRMs were dangerous at 100c then Asus wouldn't be letting their cards get that hot. By the same logic Artic would have built a different VRM cooling solution long ago. After all, pretty much all of their addon coolers have had the same design for years.
I agree that in all things GPU related cooler = better, but lets cut out the hyperbole and proclaim that 100c on a VRM is going to kill a graphic card. It won't

Where exactly did I say 100c would kill a video card.. cause a fire or any of the crap that you just attributed to me in this post? I mean.. you set up the strawman nicely and knocked him over and all... but I've never claimed any of the points you just argued.
^^^ I understand what the VRM's are rated at. These gpu's are rated at over 90c as well. No way in hell I want mine running that hot.
What worries me is that some of the temps reported by those using the Accelero kit are a good 40~50c higher than a stock cooler. If I'm going to drop $100 on a aftermarket cooler I'd expect better cooling. The Accelero kit achieves that for the GPU but is hit-n-miss on the VRM.
1) I never lumped GPU & VRM temps together.
^^^ I understand what the VRM's are rated at. These gpu's are rated at over 90c as well. No way in hell I want mine running that hot.
2) I never said 100c VRM would do damage, cause a fire, is dangerous or kill a graphics card.
I did say I expected better from an aftermarket cooler. I did say no way in hell I'd let my temps get that high.
So yes.. lets "cut out the hyperbole" and stick to discussing points I've actually made shall we?![]()
Hmm, lets ses now, how would I have got the idea that you feel that over 90c is too hot. Ah here it is.
You have repeatedly stated that 100c is too hot for VRMs. The implication I took from your above statement is that anything over 90c for GPUs is dangerous. The term "No way in hell" in the context of this thread is hardly an ambiguous statement that can be taken any other way.
You are by admission lumping GPU temps and VRM temps together, ie 100c = fire.
I agree, it should be better, but the fact that they are still running inside the upper VRM limits seems to be lost on you.
Yes you did, here it is again for you to read. The term VRM and GPU used together, clear as day to me.
Not outright no, but the implication is there considering the jist of your posts. For example soulrider4ever stated he had his VRM's and the temps at 92C and 65C and you replied it was still "awfull hot". How else are we meant to take the quote "awfull hot" if not as some sort of warning?
I am discussing the points you made, you clearly can't remember them.
you guys better end it now before mods come in and lock the topic thanks to you two![]()
Asus VRMs on the 7970 DirectCUii are supposedly better then reference so temperature tolerance on those may be higher. This is what I like the most about the Asus though.
Unlike traditional chokes, Super Alloy Chokes run 35°C cooler* and eliminate buzzing noise under load.
http://www.asus.com/News/1SEPpyJktCfBBHEj/