D
Deleted member 104402
Guest
a
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I doubt that very much. The reason ATX has been so strong even in the face of smaller mATX and mini-ITX is that it offers a balance between expandability and small size. With people using SLI/CF regularly now, smaller board sizes just don't have enough physical space for the necessary expansion slots. without an extremely compelling reason to switch form factors (like an exponential shrinking of the sheer physical size of GPU boards), I don't see ATX sized boards going anywhere for a long time.
I doubt that very much. The reason ATX has been so strong even in the face of smaller mATX and mini-ITX is that it offers a balance between expandability and small size. With people using SLI/CF regularly now, smaller board sizes just don't have enough physical space for the necessary expansion slots. without an extremely compelling reason to switch form factors (like an exponential shrinking of the sheer physical size of GPU boards), I don't see ATX sized boards going anywhere for a long time.
BTX combined some good ideas (primerally swapping the system round so that cards faced upwards and in particular the graphics card faced away from the other cards) with some ideas that seemed good at the time but caused problems down the road. In particular fixing the location of the CPU allowed for more integrated cooling (good) but caused problems with CPUs with integrated memory controllers (bad).will the ATX form factor eventually die completely and get replaced with BTX? how many more years do we have with ATX?
Small form factors = no dual GPU.
I don't care what the CPU manufacturers say, an AGP unit cannot compare to a seperate CPU/GPU setup. ^_^
ATX is here to stay... unless there is a significant change in how we define a "computer" in terms of architecture.
Light ray processing, anyone?
Small form factors = no dual GPU.
I don't care what the CPU manufacturers say, an AGP unit cannot compare to a seperate CPU/GPU setup. ^_^
ATX is here to stay... unless there is a significant change in how we define a "computer" in terms of architecture.
Light ray processing, anyone?
Not to mention that dual-GPU single cards are quite mainstream now.That is False they do have mATX board with Crossfire support
will the ATX form factor eventually die completely and get replaced with BTX? how many more years do we have with ATX?
I wonder if their will be a time soon that we'll start seeing "multi core" GPUs.
I'm thinking more along the lines of having two physical GPUs built into one. Even if it's two GPUs per board and/or they put them in the same "chip".
Sorry im part of the bigger is better camp.
I think we all need to start seeing more E-atx bords .
Heat sinks keep taking up more and more space and i like being able to add more stuff to my computer as time gos on .
Mini sized anything really doesn't do much for me unless i want something small for lan gaming that i can pop in a backpack something like xbox 360 size but for my main rig bigger is better in my book
you can keep your mini sized computers![]()
![]()
48 cores 12 cores per cpu .sick i want one
![]()
I doubt that very much. The reason ATX has been so strong even in the face of smaller mATX and mini-ITX is that it offers a balance between expandability and small size. With people using SLI/CF regularly now, smaller board sizes just don't have enough physical space for the necessary expansion slots. without an extremely compelling reason to switch form factors (like an exponential shrinking of the sheer physical size of GPU boards), I don't see ATX sized boards going anywhere for a long time.
true, just because you CAN cram two full size GPUs on a mATX board doesn't mean you should. If you want [H]ardware you still need an ATX because thats where the high-end market is. Many mATX boards don't have the same level of build quality in terms of power phases or bios customization becuase they're not targeted at the high end. If I'm building some little econobox for my mom, or an HTPC, i'll go with a mATX or even mini-ITX board, but when it comes to real overclocking hardware, go big or go home.. its the only way to get everything you want and need.Not to mention, some of us still use a sound card, and may want a slot or two for something like wi-fi or a TV tuner card. And maybe it's just me, but I'd be nervous about cramming two video cards on a micro ATX board since they'd be practically touching each other. I would want a little space in between for airflow.
I realize you can do a lot with a micro board, but I wouldn't want to get one just for the sake of making the case smaller. I don't care much about the size unless it's a portable device. And the thing is, ATX is just an option. If you want a smaller board, you're free to get one. There's no need to make them all smaller because some people don't need the larger size.
Oh yeah? Where are you going to fit your two floppy drives?This makes me lol.. I Used to be like this, but then I realised I can get more into a mITX then I actually need. & Then it takes up Very Very little Desk Space, & Is a whole lot sexier then the hodge podge of random cases I used to have (looked alot like the one quoted)
Thats true, many don't, but some do, and you only need one. My processor is considerably overclocked w/ a 4870x2 in my small form factor system, and that thing is huge. It has a BluRay player that can also do DVDs, and fits two 2TB harddrives and a SSD. Plenty. And its attractive and fits on a bookshelf under the table.Activate: AMD said:Many mATX boards don't have the same level of build quality in terms of power phases or bios customization becuase they're not targeted at the high end.
Oh yeah? Where are you going to fit your two floppy drives?
Seriously... what the heck??? Planned obsolescence War Zone.![]()