• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

9800 pro vs 9600XT

pigpen

2[H]4U
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Messages
2,408
Assuming these could be had for the same $, what is the better choice?
 
This has been talked about dozens of times: The 9800 Pro...8 pipelines vs 4 pipelines = large difference.
 
9800Pro, no question there. Has 256bit memory, and 8pipes.
9600XT is 128bit, and has "only" 4pipes.
 
Squishead said:
This has been talked about dozens of times: The 9800 Pro...8 pipelines vs 4 pipelines = large difference.

so out of curiosity, why the similarity in price? Shouldn't the 9600 be proportionally less? Is there something about the XT's architecture that would make it more valuable than a regular pro?

And while this is off topic, what about 9800 pro vs fx5900? It's my understanding that ATI pretty much owned nvidia with the last gen of cards. Is that thinking correct?
 
Yes, it is strange that the price of 9600XT is same as 9800Pro's. Dunno where's the catch. 9800Pro is much better.

And yes, it ATi pretty much did own FX series. Though FX's are still good cards (5900, 5950) in games, that dont support DX9. 9800Pro, again, ownz whole FX series.
 
ATi's last generation did definately win out over the FX series. No doubt there. The 9800Pro is an older design than the 9600XT, but the 9800Pro is the superior card. Plain and simple. Although for the price of a 9800Pro or just a bit more you could get a 6600GT that would definatley be faster.
 
Back
Top