It looks like the 6800 GT all over again. Looks good.
http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/evalue/evalue/graphics/0508/687052.html
http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/evalue/evalue/graphics/0508/687052.html
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
purgatory said:It looks like the 6800 GT all over again. Looks good.
http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/evalue/evalue/graphics/0508/687052.html
fallguy said:Not even close to the 6800GT "all over again". Last time, it was just clock speed tha was the difference. This time, its clock speed, and pipes. Its more like the 6800NU and 6800GT of last gen.
purgatory said:I meant performance/price compared to 7800GTX
purgatory said:I meant performance/price compared to 7800GTX
Big Fat Duck said:they dont have any tests running the GT at stock speeds
Terra said:You mean like all the BGF, XFX & eVGA cards all running at reference speed?
Terra...
fallguy said:Its impossible to tell that from this "review". Why? Because they use a 7800GT clocked at 450/1050. 50Mhz core, and 50Mhz memory faster than stock. Then they use the default speeds of the 7800GTX of 430/1200.
That makes zero sense to me. They use a heavily overclocked GT, and a normal clocked GTX. There are several GTX clocked much higher than 430/1200. Cards shipping even up to 490/1300. Comparing a overclocked card, to a normally clocked card is just silly. They should have either used a GT clocked at 400/1000, or a equally overclocked GTX.
Ill wait for a real review.
fallguy said:Its impossible to tell that from this "review". Why? Because they use a 7800GT clocked at 450/1050. 50Mhz core, and 50Mhz memory faster than stock. Then they use the default speeds of the 7800GTX of 430/1200.
That makes zero sense to me. They use a heavily overclocked GT, and a normal clocked GTX. There are several GTX clocked much higher than 430/1200. Cards shipping even up to 490/1300. Comparing a overclocked card, to a normally clocked card is just silly. They should have either used a GT clocked at 400/1000, or a equally overclocked GTX.
Ill wait for a real review.
purgatory said:Reviewers use what they have on hand, and if they have a reference GTX then thats what they use. So if XFX clocks there GT at 450/1050 reviewers should downclock it to nvidia specs? Im glad to see reviews with actual retail products, you know the products people actually end up buying.
Shifra said:All GT's are using G70 cores, no native 20pipe version. Its either going to be bios or laser locked, problably bios.
Asian Dub Foundation said:can u provide some info on GTs using the G70 core?
Shifra said:I assume you mean that they use the same core; nVidia never had a seperate core cleared by PCI-Sig. They would have to do this to stamp boxes with the PCI Express ready logo if the core were a native 20pipe version. So its either laser locked or bios locked G70s. Not much of a surprise here, will save money initially.
...the sexual price compared one word without a doubt...
Elios said:hmm id like to see a review with the GT and GTX at 400 core and 1000 mem on both just to see how much faster the extra 4 pipes are
DieLate said:On this Japanese site they did the GT and GTX at 430/1200:
http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/evalue/evalue/graphics/0508/687052_14.html
They got the GT all the way up to 510/1250. Not too shabby.
DieLate said:On this Japanese site they did the GT and GTX at 430/1200:
http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/evalue/evalue/graphics/0508/687052_14.html
They got the GT all the way up to 510/1250. Not too shabby.
I saw that to=Vector= said:looks like this is gonna be my next card, hurry up and release it already!
EDIT:
nice translation
Actually, 7800GT will exist in AGP.Cali3350 said:I only have AGP anyway. Nvidia is too stupid to take advantage of that market.
mavalpha said:Actually, 7800GT will exist in AGP.