• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

6800GT and 'Test Settings' button

Sou| Colossus

Weaksauce
Joined
Jun 30, 2003
Messages
105
I've got my 6800GT (Leadtek A400) stable at 428/1140, a notch above on either and it's rejected. Is the test feature fool proof? Beacuse it was stuck on 425, but I found that if I increased it only by 1mhz at a time and kept repeating the test, it would eventually let me go up. I did this until I got to 428.

If I used an alternate overclocking method, is it possible that it would be stable at higher than 428/1140? Worth attempting?
 
The "test" feature gives you a good idea about what you might get from an overclock, but it's not the last say. I want to let you know just because the test passed on a step-up on the overclock, doesnt mean your o/c is stable. Personally, I go 3mhz at a time, and run some bench marks, and then play my favorite games/real life usage for a couple of hours. If there are no problems, I go up again. I dont like moving up too fast, too soon, so it can be days before finding my "sweet spot". I may be too conservative, but I've never damaged any hardware yet.
 
Monkey34 said:
The "test" feature gives you a good idea about what you might get from an overclock, but it's not the last say. I want to let you know just because the test passed on a step-up on the overclock, doesnt mean your o/c is stable. Personally, I go 3mhz at a time, and run some bench marks, and then play my favorite games/real life usage for a couple of hours. If there are no problems, I go up again. I dont like moving up too fast, too soon, so it can be days before finding my "sweet spot". I may be too conservative, but I've never damaged any hardware yet.
that's usually a good plan. 30 minutes would probably be sufficient in a game though. you're gonna know pretty quick whether it works or not. Once you get artifacting in games (random white dots, missing textures, etc...) then bump it down 2 or 3 mghz and that's when i'd do an endurance test like monkey does between every step up.
 
30 minutes would probably be sufficient in a game though.
Like I said, I'm conservative. :D
Problem is, it usually goes for everything I do. It definately doesn't help at the blackjack table :D ........I'd have to change that to "I may be too conservative, SO I DONT WIN BIG" ;)
 
Back
Top