• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

6800 or 6800XT?

paco

Gawd
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Messages
952
That's the question, which do I get? For now it'll still be 1080p gaming, but I expect to buy a new monitor soon. I'll probably stick with 1440p, but may go 4k. Plan to play Starfield first once I have something. Is the XT worth an extra $100?

Rig it's going in.
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
Gigabyte B650 AORUS ELITE AX ATX AM5
G.Skill Ripjaws S5 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR5-6400
 
Just built a new rig for friend for exactly the same reason only difference is resolution as he wants 1080P ultra for starfield. The gpu I put in is an RX6750XT but all other main components are the same. The system runs 1080P ultra except shadow quality at high for 60 FPS 95% of the time. I think the XT would be the better choice as starfield is quite taxing with ultra settings and I had to really tune(cpu/gpu) in his system in every way I could to deliver the experience he wants. BTW that board has a bios bug with the F7 bios regarding curve optimizer not saving the offset for all core negative offsets. Tried per core offsets as a workaround and core #5 refused to retain it's offset. Updated to F8 and it exhibited the same behavior until I applied the offset via per core and it finally saved as all core. Strange I know but it works as intended now.
 
Last edited:
xt, its a decent bump up from the non xt. also, make sure youve got 750w psu min. looks like youve got 850w.

1700774726257.png

1700774755045.png
 
Just built a new rig for friend for exactly the same reason only difference is resolution as he wants 1080P ultra for starfield. The gpu I put in is an RX6750XT but all other main components are the same. The system runs 1080P ultra except shadow quality at high for 60 FPS 95% of the time. I think the XT would be the better choice as starfield is quite taxing with ultra settings and I had to really tune(cpu/gpu) in his system in every way I could to deliver the experience he wants. BTW that board has a bios bug with the F7 bios regarding curve optimizer not saving the offset for all core negative offsets. Tried per core offsets as a workaround and core #5 refused to retain it's offset. Updated to F8 and it exhibited the same behavior until I applied the offset via per core and it finally saved as all core. Strange I know but it works as intended now.
I'm going to have to learn what a lot of that means! But thanks for the info!
 
It's worth the extra $100 for the XT model especially if you decide to up your resolution to 1440p or higher. While they both at a glance seem to be close in that they have 16GB VRAM on a 256bit bus the differences are very far apart when you look at what was cut out from the RX 6800 vanilla. The meaningful differences are as follows.....

RX 6800.........................vs.........................RX 6800XT
3840 shaders..............................................4608 shaders
60 RT cores.................................................72 RT cores
96 ROPs......................................................128 ROPs
240 TMUs....................................................288 TMUs
13.9 TFLOPs...............................................18.6 TFLOPs
 
On amazon
6800xt - $469.99
6800 - $369.99

I've got the xt in my cart along with a LG 27GP850-B monitor. Will be $812.33 after tax for me. Just have to press the button!
I'd get a 7800 XT for ~ $500 - $520 and sell the Avatar game code.

Less power usage, newer architecture (which is generally a bit faster) and new features.

If you qualify, you can also do 11% off with Zippay, at Newegg.
 
I'd get a 7800 XT for ~ $500 - $520 and sell the Avatar game code.

Less power usage, newer architecture (which is generally a bit faster) and new features.

If you qualify, you can also do 11% off with Zippay, at Newegg.
Thanks. Didn't realize the 7800xt was that close in price.
 
On amazon
6800xt - $469.99
6800 - $369.99

I've got the xt in my cart along with a LG 27GP850-B monitor. Will be $812.33 after tax for me. Just have to press the button!
I would just get a used one.

Thoughts on the Power Color Hellhound? A little more (but less than Merc) but you get Avatar with it. You don't get that on the Qick.
Better to get a current gen 7000 series anyway - if going previous gen these days - it's better, imho, to get a used card and save some money. I haven't read too much on the 7000 series below the 7900 - but, I think most of the cards are pretty good - the Sapphire and Powercolor cards appear to be pretty good. There is some speculation that the 7800 XT doesn't eclipse 6800 XT performance all the time - meaning it will match, at best - which seems pretty bad to me. But, guys here probably know more about that than I do.

For gaming, they're good enough.
 
I would just get a used one.


Better to get a current gen 7000 series anyway - if going previous gen these days - it's better, imho, to get a used card and save some money. I haven't read too much on the 7000 series below the 7900 - but, I think most of the cards are pretty good - the Sapphire and Powercolor cards appear to be pretty good. There is some speculation that the 7800 XT doesn't eclipse 6800 XT performance all the time - meaning it will match, at best - which seems pretty bad to me. But, guys here probably know more about that than I do.

For gaming, they're good enough.
This is probably the first time I've ever spent more than $125 on a card! Have been a regular purchaser of used here for 20 years. Finally said screw it and spent some real money on myself. Not top of the line, but it's going to do what I want, and better than I've ever had before.

As always, appreciate all the input from [H].
 
Thanks. Didn't realize the 7800xt was that close in price.

I also did some sleuthing myself. The differences between MERC/QICK/SWFT are that marketing would have you believe that is in order of best to basic; in reality they are all basically the same except whether or not there are side lighting (cosmetic). I guess you've got to check clock speed of whatever model too.

I had 6800xt Merc for a minute - it looked and felt really nice in hand but for whatever reason it did not get along with my rig - it ran hotter and louder than I thought it would. Hopefully the 7 series is better, really contemplating trying again.
 
I guess you've got to check clock speed of whatever model too.
theres a little over 125 mhz between the different versions. the 7800xt qick black is actually the fastest at 2599 boost(up to).
 
It's worth the extra $100 for the XT model especially if you decide to up your resolution to 1440p or higher. While they both at a glance seem to be close in that they have 16GB VRAM on a 256bit bus the differences are very far apart when you look at what was cut out from the RX 6800 vanilla. The meaningful differences are as follows.....

RX 6800.........................vs.........................RX 6800XT
3840 shaders..............................................4608 shaders
60 RT cores.................................................72 RT cores
96 ROPs......................................................128 ROPs
240 TMUs....................................................288 TMUs
13.9 TFLOPs...............................................18.6 TFLOPs

Regular 6800 can handle 1440p without a hiccup.. but yeah... 6800XT is a one damn good value right now
 
I just bought a 6800. Non-XT. I was going to go 6700xt (yes, SEVEN). The price difference was about $20, so 6800 it was. This is a filler card for 1440 gaming.
 
Back
Top