Is this an April Fool's joke or a real device?
http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/29/buslinks-64gb-usb-2-0-flash-drive-pro-2-series/
http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/29/buslinks-64gb-usb-2-0-flash-drive-pro-2-series/
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Crosshairs said:What the hell would anyone do with that ??
Soymilk said:it'll beat the pants off of a raptor. i saw somewhere they had a 32gb flash card (i forgot where tho) they installed windows on it, booted in 18 seconds
![]()
lol, thats alot of pr0nLogan321 said:take all their pr0n to work with them?![]()
But wont that be much slower than conventional ram??boredguyatcomp said:i was reading something about vista yesterday and apparently when you have flash drives pluged into your comp running vista it will use the extra space for ram.
Oh....I was goona say that 64GB isn't enough!-=ABUSIVE-69=- said:lol, thats alot of pr0n
boredguyatcomp said:if its running on usb 2.0 then no not really i think it would be around pc 2700 speeds.
ands its way faster then virtual ram on your hard drive which slows down reading and writeing speeds of other programs your running. and still faster then a 15000rpm hard drive.
Yeah, I was gonna say...boredguyatcomp said:my post on the speeds wasnt correct i started accually looking into it most usb 2.0 flash drives transfer about 30MB/s pc2700 ram transfers at 2700MB/s so i was WAY WAY WAY off! sorry guys


boredguyatcomp said:i was reading something about vista yesterday and apparently when you have flash drives pluged into your comp running vista it will use the extra space for ram.
yay! another term for Swapfilebenamaster said:I have a box with Vista I'll check that out tomorrow. I think its called Virtual RAM or something.
RAM drives won't ever likely come into vogue, at least in their current form. DRAM's volatility will always make it less desirable than non-volatile solutions like Flash and magnetic storage technologies. Flash has come a long way, and a lot of industry resources are pouring into its development. Most sources say that Flash production levels have exceeded that of DRAM, and recent developments have improved performance, capacity, and write/erase endurance greatly. With endurance figures now beyond 100,000 writes/erases, the viability of Flash has come a long way. As OS and applications developers adjust to the Flash model the endurance problems will soon become negligable.unhappy_mage said:Yeah, I was gonna say...
Flash still isn't fast enough (or cheap enough per GB) to replace magnetic media for loading Windows, or just about anything. And you have to worry about maximum write cycles. Yuck. I'll wait for ramdrives to mature.
benamaster said:I have a box with Vista I'll check that out tomorrow. I think its called Virtual RAM or something.
lolzVette5885 said:Oh....I was goona say that 64GB isn't enough!
CompMage said:Ummmm all I have to say to Ram drives needing to mature is this
http://www.superssd.com/products/tera-ramsan/
Tera-RamSan Details
Up to 1 Terabyte of non-volatile DDRRAM in 24U.
Unlimited overall capacity
Over 3.2 million random I/O requests per second.
Over 24 GB/second of random sustainable data bandwidth.
Up to 512 physical LUNs.
Requires 2,500 watts of power.
Up to 8 independent non-volatile solid state disks (SSD) modules. Each SSD module is a RamSan-400, including 128 GB of DDRRAM and up to eight 4-Gbit Fibre Channel connections.
boredguyatcomp said:yeah thats what its called, what windows has always called it...
i assume you have the current build? not quite sure its on it yet though???
unhappy_mage said:Yeah, I was gonna say...
And you have to worry about maximum write cycles. Yuck. I'll wait for ramdrives to mature.
benamaster said:I have a box with Vista I'll check that out tomorrow. I think its called Virtual RAM or something.
if it "can" wouldnt that mean its in one of the betas?roninblade said:that is true, vista can use flash drives for spare ram, but i dont think its implemented into any of the beta's currently out
lol....unfortuneatly i can but it hurts..acascianelli said:Could you imagine a 64gb Ipod Shuffle![]()
MDSarcasm said:I think its fake, no way you can fit 64gigs into a stick that size and if you could, they would be using that tech for RAM already.