6200 or 9600xt

If it won't be overclocked, 9600XT
For overclocking go with the 6200, get the 128mb one, 256mb is useless.
 
The 9600XT, just so you know Newegg has a few supposed 256-bit 9800 Pros for around $125. That would be a much better deal considering the price of that 9600 XT.
 
Get a 6600 GT and spend the extra 50 bucks it will be well worth it.
 
At stock speeds, the 9600XT should eat the 6200s lunch - that 9600XT (out of stock, tho) is a 4-pipe card with a 500MHz core and 600MHz 128-bit memory. The 6200 is 4-pipes at 380MHz and 500MHz 128-bit memory.

While their might be slight differences between what 1MHz really means on each chip, that 9600XT is still going to have a much higher fill rate and memory bandwidth; it should easily be 20% faster.
 
Skrying said:
Add to the fact that the 9600XT is actually a very good overclocker.
If the 9600XT is a "very good overclocker" then 6200s must be on another scale. :p 6200s typically overclock on the core by 150-250MHz with stock cooling.
 
pxc said:
If the 9600XT is a "very good overclocker" then 6200s must be on another scale. :p 6200s typically overclock on the core by 150-250MHz with stock cooling.

Yes, that is an extremely good overclocker. I've seen 9600XT's been taken up by 75Mhz, that's not bad at all....
 
pxc said:
If the 9600XT is a "very good overclocker" then 6200s must be on another scale. 6200s typically overclock on the core by 150-250MHz with stock cooling.
And thats not even takeing into account the extra 4 pipes just waiting to be unlocked.
 
If you try ebay you MIGHT be able to get a 6600 for about $100 with some luck. It might be worth looking into.
 
Back
Top