• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

3DMark2003 NV40 image ( 14,860 )

E

evilchris

Limp Gawd
Joined
Nov 4, 2003
Messages
274
http://www.geocities.com/democoder2000/3dmark2k3.jpg

Right click that link and SAVE AS. Don't try to view it, nothing will be pulled. Thats from DemoCoder over at Beyond3D, he attended the NVIDIA launch event. No details as to what config ran that other than a 3.4GHz P4. Not known if it was an ultra or not either.

Thread where its unfolding:

http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11511&start=40


Already exceeded. I managed to save it. Anywhere I can upload it? My Cox.net website will exceed transfer fast. The result is 14,860 btw.
 
yeah im reading same stuff, too bad his link is already down due to bandwidth lol. ill host the pic if you have it saved evil.
 
That result only means one of two things.

The unsubstantiated "Hardocp review" is of a non ultra, or 3dmark03 is completely worthless, not just partially. 14k is INSANE. No driver cheating is going to net that.
 
lol, I put it there after I saw his post! I think it's a broadband user. He'll love that.
 
Here...I'll make it easier for you all:)
titles.jpg

3dmark2k3.jpg

nv-01.jpg

unreal3.jpg
 
....holy fuck......

and people said there wernt gonna be any ps/vs 3.0 games anytime soon rofl. owned.

unreal 3 looks O_O
 
That's a sh!tload of 3dmarks but whats the damn use if it does not play too well in today's games..
 
Originally posted by evilchris
That result only means one of two things.

The unsubstantiated "Hardocp review" is of a non ultra, or 3dmark03 is completely worthless, not just partially. 14k is INSANE. No driver cheating is going to net that.
Click to expand...

Or, more likely, all this is BS!
Just like the 80% performance gains across the board and 12k 3dMark scores.

It just love how everyone is jerking off over every little scrap that falls out of someone's ass. Wait for some actual reviews before you get all hot and bothered.
 
Holy shizzle. Look closely at the 3dmark shot.....where it states system specs, it clearly says only "6800". 14k on a non ultra? What is the Ultra then? :eek: :eek:

Maybe Kyle and Brent put up fake benches on purpose because they knew spy's would be looking. ;)

The leaked [H] numbers just don't seem to go correctly with the high 3dmarks Nvidia is toting.
 
Originally posted by ShuttleLuv


The leaked [H] numbers just don't seem to go correctly with the high 3dmarks Nvidia is toting.
Click to expand...

Many things don't see to go correctly with what NVidia is toting.
 
could care less about 3dmark but that unreal engine 3 tech demo pic.. woah
 
Well, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. There's no cheat that could net that huge of a gain. Either NV40 kicks extreme ASS and the benches here leaked are fake to put us off, or Nvidia is pulling the greatest lie in history.
 
Originally posted by ShuttleLuv
Holy shizzle. Look closely at the 3dmark shot.....where it states system specs, it clearly says only "6800". 14k on a non ultra? What is the Ultra then? :eek: :eek:

Maybe Kyle and Brent put up fake benches on purpose because they knew spy's would be looking. ;)

The leaked [H] numbers just don't seem to go correctly with the high 3dmarks Nvidia is toting.
Click to expand...

Out of curiosity, what does 3dmark03 say for 5900 cards? Does it specifically say 5900 ultra when a 5900 ultra is used?

*edit*: WOW, in the 5 seconds I type my post, 4 other people have posted. Talk about a hot thread.
 
Out of curiosity, what does 3dmark03 say for 5900 cards? Does it specifically say 5900 ultra when a 5900 ultra is used?
Click to expand...

Good question! Somebody?

Edit - Btw, I'm thinking maybe now that the 14k is the Ultra and the rumored 12k (Inqwell, others etc) is for the non Ultra.
 
Originally posted by ShuttleLuv
Well, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. There's no cheat that could net that huge of a gain. Either NV40 kicks extreme ASS and the benches here leaked are fake to put us off, or Nvidia is pulling the greatest lie in history.
Click to expand...

Nv30 = present
 
Originally posted by Killdozer
Many things don't see to go correctly with what NVidia is toting.
Click to expand...

Yeah, all the BS rumors and gifs at Finnish websites. There is no way NVIDIA will fumble twice in a row, no way. Especially repeating the NV30 debacle precisely. You really think NVIDIA is a hack shop running out of someones garage Killdozer? A bunch of guys with 100 IQ's?
 
Originally posted by EarthwormJim
Out of curiosity, what does 3dmark03 say for 5900 cards? Does it specifically say 5900 ultra when a 5900 ultra is used?

*edit*: WOW, in the 5 seconds I type my post, 4 other people have posted. Talk about a host thread.
Click to expand...

I had a 5950 Ultra and it said Ultra. My GF2 Ultra said Ultra, and my TNT2 Ultra said Ultra when I had those cards.
 
Who cares if it puts out 15,000,000 3DMarks... Didn't the community determine a long time ago that 3DMark is no longer reliable?

I know I want to see these cards play a damn game. Screw 3DMark.
 
Perhaps the naming isn't down quite right yet?

I mean, consider:
* This is the launch party for an entire generation of cards. Would nVidia do ANYTHING but put their 'best and brightest' up?!
* A score of nearly 15k on a 12-pipe core running at best 400mhz (the Ultra is 400, we don't know what the NU runs at - surely lower)!? Clearly impossible!
* These would be 'pre-release' drivers at best.

Dunno, I'd put money on those being 'Ultra' scores.
 
Originally posted by dderidex
Perhaps the naming isn't down quite right yet?

I mean, consider:
* This is the launch party for an entire generation of cards. Would nVidia do ANYTHING but put their 'best and brightest' up?!
* A score of nearly 15k on a 12-pipe core running at best 400mhz (the Ultra is 400, we don't know what the NU runs at - surely lower)!? Clearly impossible!
* These would be 'pre-release' drivers at best.

Dunno, I'd put money on those being 'Ultra' scores.
Click to expand...

Where does 3dmark "get" the graphics card name? The latest dets have:

NVIDIA_NV40.DEV_0040.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra"
NVIDIA_NV40.DEV_0041.1 = "NVIDIA GeForce 6800"


So if it pulls from the driver you'll get the "Ultra". Also, "Ultra" is such a favorite branding for NVIDIA, you'd think it would be smeared all over the place, especially on 3dmark results.
 
Originally posted by Spinal
Who cares if it puts out 15,000,000 3DMarks... Didn't the community determine a long time ago that 3DMark is no longer reliable?

I know I want to see these cards play a damn game. Screw 3DMark.
Click to expand...

Silly n00b, don't you know anything?

nVidia is winning! That means 3dMark is reliable again!

DUH! :rolleyes:

:D :D :D
 
ghey, I'd feel like a fag putting that thing on the counter. It looks like a big pr0n box.
 
It looks like a blow-up doll package.

The 15000k score can't possibly be for the non-pro.
 
I would just love to see the design meetings for video card boxes. The most random things imaginable are put on those boxes.
 
btw guys, if you notice the 3dmark03 image...it shows
3.4ghz @
(like its overclocked)

just for you guys who want to make a case. this image is of a 2.4ghz cpu not overclocked.

Image3.jpg


so im pretty sure that 14k score isnt a oc'ed cpu.
 
Why would nvidia show off the scores of their 2nd best card? (Even though it is damn impressive, you know how marketing goes.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top