3Dmark11... what the?

[UG_PL]

OK, I ran 3Dmark11 and my Physics Score is very low...

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/223588?key=sDmdKSskHaPnpveMWyznsRt0NQnphx

3DMark Score P3467

Graphics score 4019

Physics Score 2567

Combined Score 2306

GraphicsTest117.38 FPS
GraphicsTest218.24 FPS
GraphicsTest325.0 FPS
GraphicsTest413.07 FPS
PhysicsTest8.15 FPS
CombinedTest10.73 FPS

Any reasons why it's so low? I should be getting about 4000 points . I don't see anything that might have cause the score to drop...

 

[Rossi~]

Drop from what?

Note that the physics in 3DMark 2011 uses Bullet Physics NOT Physx.

 

[Dave65]

OK, I ran 3Dmark11 and my Physics Score is very low...

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/223588?key=sDmdKSskHaPnpveMWyznsRt0NQnphx

3DMark Score P3467

Graphics score 4019

Physics Score 2567

Combined Score 2306

GraphicsTest117.38 FPS
GraphicsTest218.24 FPS
GraphicsTest325.0 FPS
GraphicsTest413.07 FPS
PhysicsTest8.15 FPS
CombinedTest10.73 FPS

Any reasons why it's so low? I should be getting about 4000 points . I don't see anything that might have cause the score to drop...

your score looks about right to me from what ive seen..and 3D Mark 11 does not utilizes physics like vantage does.

 

[spacing guild]

huh...my rig is a tad slower phenom an a gtx 460 and I score higher.

 

[Apostrophe]

Does 3DMark11 support an added PhysX-dedicated GPU?

Like running a 570 for graphics and a 275 for PhysX?

 

[Nexus6]

Does 3DMark11 support an added PhysX-dedicated GPU?

Like running a 570 for graphics and a 275 for PhysX?

Since it doesn't use PhysX, no?

 

[Apostrophe]

Since it doesn't use PhysX, no?

Oh, I had no idea. I just assumed that since they are testing physics performance, they would use it. Silly me.

 

[UG_PL]

huh...my rig is a tad slower phenom an a gtx 460 and I score higher.

Exactly. In the physics test I get about 7 to 8 fps

 

[iamfat]

with the new 3dmark11 benchmark program scores are so low imo. i get about 4200.

i7 920; 470