Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Basically the 3870 is anywhere on average from 5 to 20%+ faster than a 2900XT with slightly less than half the power consumption. BUY THEM!!!
If you decide to get a Sapphire card, be prepared to have massive headaches trying to get RMA replacements. Check around on the forums and you'll see why.
Our sources also tell us that we should expect further performance enhancements to the ATI drivers around the same time that the first patch for Crysis is released. The first driver hotfix that was already released increased AA performance by 5-10 percent.
If the last hotfix was any indication, we are expecting another leap in performance on ATI hardware, as well.
what do you guys think worth going from a 6800gt to 3870?
what do you guys think worth going from a 6800gt to 3870?
thats becose the driver is in beta (as in the CD driver)
it was relesed before the driver was fully optimized
ati has allways been know for making huge improvments to AA performace in drivers
look out for catalyst 7.11 here http://game.amd.com/us-en/drivers_catalyst.aspx
![]()
lol the 6800 is like 50% slower than the X1800 XTwhat do you guys think worth going from a 6800gt to 3870?
UVD is worth half the price of the card alone, performace is on pair with 2900 XT, and that is 50% faster than X1800, so 6800 will be OWNED over 3-4 times in performacewhat do you guys think worth going from a 6800gt to 3870?
That's only if you have a HD video player that supports UVD...UVD is worth half the price of the card alone
only VC-1 and H264 is decoded in hardware and it depends on what software you useThat's only if you have a HD video player that supports UVD...
I tried playing an WMV-HD file in Windows Media player with and without the WMV acceleration setting turned on in the WMP11 and it made no difference. Both CPU cores were >30% utilization when playing the file on my HD3870 with the Crysis Patch drivers in 64-Bit Vista.
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 149.52s, Average FPS: 13.38
Min FPS: 0.32 at frame 556, Max FPS: 18.43 at frame 862
Average Tri/Sec: -8891278, Tri/Frame: -664701
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.38
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 137.56s, Average FPS: 14.54
Min FPS: 0.32 at frame 556, Max FPS: 18.43 at frame 862
Average Tri/Sec: -9508083, Tri/Frame: -653984
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.40
I am happy as a clam
They said the exact same thing about the 2900 series too and that turned out to be bullshit. Im willing to bet its no different with the 3800 series as well. If your expecting magical drivers that improve the performance of these cards prepare to be disappointed.
One must wonder though, why IS the clam so happy?![]()
must be the creative card[Paragon];1031744449 said:I just went from an x1800xt (256mb) to a 3850 and I've seen quite a nice jump in perfomance. Case in point with the x1800xt I couldn't play with full dynamic lighting in Stalker and had choppy play. With the new card I can turn all the eye candy on (including dynamic lights!) and play pretty smooth. Haven't seen the fps drop below 35ish in awhile (I play at 1440x900)
CoD4 is pretty sweet now, and I can play crysis at 1440x400 with a mix of medium and high settings at a pretty smooth fps (dips below 30, but my system aint exactly high end)
I will say though that my 3850 hates either my A8N32-SLI deluxe or my X-FI sound card. Have had some weird stability issues, but not with the cheapo foxconn nforce 4 board. Odd