Ok, so I just noticed on newegg a 3.0E is only 20 bucks more than a 3.0C. Does the 1MB cache really make that much of a difference you guys think? If so, in what kind of applications or how would I notice the difference?
Also, if it does really make that much of a difference. Which would give us better performance out of these two then;
P4 3.0C overclocked hopefully at least to 3.6 maybe higher.
OR
P4 3.0E not overclocked.
My tasks include, photoshop, premiere, media player, cakewalk project 5, WinRAR, DVD&CD ripping and burning, MS office, ect.. I also like to do everything at once. Oh yeah, and games too of course!
How much hotter do the Prescott's run? So what would give me better performance you guys think then? A 600Mhz. higher clock, or a cache size twice as large?
Is the heat the only reason why so many people aren't overclocking the E's as much?
Also, if it does really make that much of a difference. Which would give us better performance out of these two then;
P4 3.0C overclocked hopefully at least to 3.6 maybe higher.
OR
P4 3.0E not overclocked.
My tasks include, photoshop, premiere, media player, cakewalk project 5, WinRAR, DVD&CD ripping and burning, MS office, ect.. I also like to do everything at once. Oh yeah, and games too of course!
How much hotter do the Prescott's run? So what would give me better performance you guys think then? A 600Mhz. higher clock, or a cache size twice as large?
Is the heat the only reason why so many people aren't overclocking the E's as much?