2x2GB Fun: Mushkin HP2-6400

(cf)Eclipse

Freelance Overclocker
Joined
Feb 18, 2003
Messages
30,027
I've had this kit sitting around for a while, but between finals week, going home, moving into a new apartment and starting new classes, I've had depressingly little time to dedicate towards overclocking. After much frustration and excitement, I have finally completed the testing for this 2x2GB kit from Mushkin.

The rated specification is 400MHz at 5-4-4-12 with 2.0v, and they come with blue heatspreaders with Mushkin's signature loops on the top for some additional cooling. How well these loops work, I am unsure, as the memory ran pretty warm under my 120mm Delta as I approached 2.5v, but it's certainly better than nothing. :D

(click for larger pic)




Blue is my favorite color... :cool:


Overclocking:

So, when overclocking, a few interesting and frustrating things were found. With 4GB of memory, things like superPI 32M don't work very well. It's only using like 1/10th of the total space. However, to tweak the timings, I needed a quick test that would fail repeatably to give me a good baseline to work from and note any improvements on. Since the best thing was usually 3 instances of windows memtest for >10 minutes, a lot of the tuning was done through guess and check, until the transition between stable and unstable improved enough to fail consistantly in 32M.

However, it is absolutely imperative that you do proper tuning with this kit. I went from being stuck at around 540MHz with 5-4-3-12 with 2.5v, looser not helping to doing just north of 600MHz at 5-4-5-12 with the same voltage. Drive strengths are most important, if you have control over them. A low "normal" drive was ideal for me. In the DFI NF590's BIOS, "normal" was always used, with a drive level near 10, depending on the timings and voltage.

For those who wonder, the system used for testing was:
AMD Athlon64 4000+ (F3)
DFI LP NF590 SLI-M2R/G
7600GT
Powerstream 420
Bunch of fans :cool:

The maximum stable speed (pass 32M, memtest for >30 min and 3dmark05) at each significant timing level and a bunch of voltages:

vvt.png



I thought that the difference between tRCD 3 and tRCD 4 is interesting, since they all seem to start at the same MHz, plus or minus a few, with really low voltage. Then depending on the other timings used, it scales better or worse to hit some final value at 2.5v. For testing purposes, I felt that going over 2.5v was probably unwise for the time being. Further testing at higher voltages showed 2.6-2.65v to be ideal for suicide runs:

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=211113

And slightly less than that was ideal for benching, though with real cooling, heat would not be quite as much of a problem, and higher may work better.

CAS 3 isn't up there because it was basically useless, getting in the low to mid 200MHz range. CAS 6 wouldn't boot at 480MHz, with 2.3v. Either it needs less voltage, or CAS 6 simply fails :p


Some random screens I took during testing:

545.5MHz @ 5-4-4-12, 2.29v in BIOS
562.2MHz @ 5-3-4-8, 2.5v in BIOS
602.8MHz @ 5-4-5-12, 2.5v in BIOS

Doing low 24 min in 32M is actually pretty good for my setup at 3GHz. I suspect that the extra banks in the 1Gbit chips (8 vs the 4 in 512Mbit chips) allow for more interleaving, thus slightly higher memory efficiency at a given timing set and speed. Speaking of chips, some interesting guys in this kit. A quick look at micron's site says that they are 333MHz, 5-5-5 binned chips, based on the revD die, but it is not in any of the technical documentation. Through some somewhat obvious math, we know that the chips are a 128x8 configuration to give the required 1Gbit density and
enough width to make a double rank module, no more or less. Being revD, which is the same as D9GMH and DKX, I'm sure they are fine for 24/7 use in the 2.2-2.3v range with adequate cooling. However, ONLY with adequate cooling, as they put out a nice amount of heat ;)

chips.jpg


Note: I'll be putting a full review up on my site in a few days, for those who want some extra jibberish with performance comparisons as well :D
 
Eclipse, did you have any problems with the heatspreaders "swimming" on the chips when they get hot? There seem to be some people reporting this odd behaviour; almost as if the adhesive is not working when they get warm.
 
I will get mine set from newegg on Monday. How would someone know if they were 'swimming' and where did you hear about this?

Also as an fyi - this model uses the same ic's as the other two more expensive models - they just binned differently per one of their folks on the mushkin forum.
 
I read a thread on the mushkin forum indicating they are testing other IC's but the HP2 and the the XP2 models all currently use the same IC.

The lower priced models use another IC.

Either way - that is what I ordered and I hope they don't suck.
 
I got my memory today - I am running them @ 1:1 at 356 fsb so my oc is processer is now at a comfortable 3.2. I haven't pushed further - I played bf2142 for a couple hours and it was stable.

This stuff runs better than my ocz platinum that it replaces.
 
not always true...some of these modules use quimonda ic's. even some of the pc2-8500 uses quimonda.

i was the one who told you that i suspected they could use quimonda, before i pulled the spreader off, based on the size of the chip. i was wrong, it's micron. if they use anything else, it's gonna be elpida apparently.

Eclipse, did you have any problems with the heatspreaders "swimming" on the chips when they get hot? There seem to be some people reporting this odd behaviour; almost as if the adhesive is not working when they get warm.

nope, though the spreaders were EXCEPTIONALLY easy to pop off
 
Back
Top