240hz LED TV

Status
Not open for further replies.
4 wrongs highlighted there in one quote.... that's what this entire debate was about, go back and look for yourself if I'm full of bs

Nothing I said was wrong... and half of it was opinion. Did you not see the "IMO"? Your argument (if you can call it that) was soley you stating that everything I said was wrong. I, and others, came back with technical information showing how you are incorrect. I fail to see how I'm skirting the original subject.
 
........Because you didn't come back with information showing I am incorrect.

Go back and look

/end

facepalm.gif
 
Yeah, because advertising works quite well on the weak minded and ignorant and they gotta have the latest and greatest. :p

Dude I am probably poorer than you for sure, I cannot afford an LED anytime soon.... you are just blatantly ignoring the facts stated above now? LED is good stuff, if you don't like SOOOOO MUCH as you claim, then why did you guys even come to this thread in the first place?

If I saw something in a deals forums describing Saab cars, I surely wouldn't click it because Saab cars suck pretty bad (IMO, of course :D)
 
Because.. once again... there is no such thing as an "LED TV" in the consumer space. Please... try and prove me wrong.

(hint: a TV that produces images solely via an array of light emitting diodes)
 
LED is good stuff, if you don't like SOOOOO MUCH as you claim, then why did you guys even come to this thread in the first place?
Like moths to a flame...

LED backlights are great if implemented correctly. Judging from much of what I've read on AVSforum, most sets aren't implementing them correctly. There are quite a few reports from calibrators of sets with LED backlights losing over half their brightness in only a few months time. This is due to poor thermal management of the LEDs.

CCFL's on the other hand like to run hot. They don't have that same problem with heat drastically shortening their life, and as a results are likely the safer buy over LED edge-lit sets. Sure, you'll pay a little more for the electricity and it might not be quite as thin, but you won't get screwed as an early adopter paying a premium for immature tech either.
 
No, it applies to the other 2 people since that's exactly what they are doing.

They keep trying to "prove" something but keep saying "most LEDs" which in turn makes them INCORRECT and unable to prove me wrong since I am solely talking about full-array LEDs in my first post (which was quoted and incorrectly beated down; hence starting this lame duck debate)

I'm not wrong obviously since you have yet to prove so, quit trying, please.... read my thread I am obviously 100% correct on everything. People in the CONSUMER WORLD use the word LED TV..... as you see, the OP asked for an LED TV (and knows what they are obviously since he asked for even more detailed specs in his question) Like I said ONCE MORE... nobody said all LED TVs are made of LEDs, you guys are "straw manning" the argument by repeatedly saying "well you're wrong because MOST led's" .... I don't care about most LEDs, I care about proving facts about the OTHER leds you ignore with your "most LEDs" regurgitation of rhetoric.

Fucking incredible how older people can NEVERRRRRRR admit they were wrong. In-credible... i deal with people like you guys daily, and they are always older than 40 and think younger people cannot be smarter than them (since they are older, they magically know more ALWAYS!)

ahahaha, what a huge joke..... please DONT reply back, it's getting sad really how desperate you are at trying not to admit you're both wrong. I have already proven you guys both in normal, and laymens quotes so you could understand fully (impossible?)
 
Last edited:
Oh boy did you attack the strawman too. And before you ask, NO! I will not point them out because I'm not here to teach logic. If you cant figure it out for yourself you shouldnt be here.

sheeeeesh, typical "young people" always wanting things done for them,

haha which leadsme to:

Fucking incredible how older people can NEVERRRRRRR admit they were wrong. In-credible... i deal with people like you guys daily, and they are always older than 40 and think younger people cannot be smarter than them (since they are older, they magically know more ALWAYS!)

This is the funniest part.

1. You obviously just aged yourself as young with this comment
2. criccio I can vouche for as "young" also being the ripe age of 24
3. Stereodude is either also "young" or has the mentality of a teenager (as you all do) for having engaged in this nonsense for so long.

so what do we have? a few infants who just dont know when to stfu!

and im out of here for a couple more months.
 
Well, whichever. Just because I have a pretty intellectual debate does not make me, or them immature.

.......how come when a few people argue/debate on a public forum or in person even, the people outside of the conversation (usually joining at the end of the debate) always point and laugh and call them crazy for getting so involved and deep into one topic?

And another funny thing that almost ALWAYS comes out of these same peoples mouth, is how much of a "life" they have, or how they are off to do something "important" rather than talk on the internet (which they just ironically contradicted by posting into the same debate they condescendingly talk about! :D )

Sorry if you can't argue or debate..... I personally love to, no matter what topic. It's good, thought-provoking conversation.... and you learn stuff usually.

See ya :D ... I'll just refresh the tab again, it takes 5 seconds out of my life, whoaaaaaa.
 
Last edited:
this this was not "intellectual"

it was hardly a "debate"

and nothing was "learned"
 
Then go back to school and learn how to read?

Weren't you going somewhere Mr. Cooler than the internet? You said you'd be back in months, and here you are replying in 4 minutes.
Fishing for attention much, mr troll?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top