The 2001FP has almost zero ghosting. There are, of course, slight motion blurring, but they are not noticeable in any sense. Even the AT Dolphin Demo ran smoothly - you can actually see that the eyes are traingular polygons, not trailing black dots. HOWEVER, there is a very major flaw in 2001FP's image quality in fast-paced video/games that defeats the whole purpose of the 2001FP's fast response time (and, I've noticed, that EVERY SINGLE review article of the 2001FP fails to address this problem, which seems to be an inherent problem in the design): there is a very strange, interlace pattern throughout the entire display when fast-motion video or game is being displayed. If you are just relaxed and not being very focused while you play, the interlace pattern is not very evident; but upon close inspection, it gets very annoying. The ATI Dolphin Demo, Final Fantasy XI, Lord of the Rings, The Matrix Reloaded all show this symptom (and this interlace-pattern is not something I've seen in any other LCD I've experienced so far - possible problem with the IPS display mode, may be? Or could it be a problem with the design of the Genesis Malibu chipset? I do not know). The interlace patterns do not appear when the video is still; so while you are taking screenshots and such, the picture looks fine. There is, however, one instance at which you can capture a glimpse of the interlace during still-video though: stare at a non-moving image (the desktop, for example), an move your vision rapidly from top to bottom of the display, and you'll see the strange interlace pattern on the display. It's gone as soon as your vision becomes still. I am almost ready to suspect that the 2001FP is using some sort of 2-field interlaced display mode (similar to that of the TV) to achieve its fast response time.
In short, the 213T actually has an edge on overall image quality, even in fast-paced motion videos. True, the 2001FP has no ghosting, but I think the interlace pattern just defeats the whole purpose of no ghosting - I consider it almost a more severe problem than ghosting.
from anadatech...
As you see, im not the only one who things this desplay is more hype. I agree ghosting is minimal. There is another problem that i feel is worst then ghosting, and this problem actually makes the 16ms rs time obsolete. If you can try before you buy. After i got over the awe of this display, i can see that there are real issues with it. Just a heads up. If your happy great. Cheers.
In short, the 213T actually has an edge on overall image quality, even in fast-paced motion videos. True, the 2001FP has no ghosting, but I think the interlace pattern just defeats the whole purpose of no ghosting - I consider it almost a more severe problem than ghosting.
from anadatech...
As you see, im not the only one who things this desplay is more hype. I agree ghosting is minimal. There is another problem that i feel is worst then ghosting, and this problem actually makes the 16ms rs time obsolete. If you can try before you buy. After i got over the awe of this display, i can see that there are real issues with it. Just a heads up. If your happy great. Cheers.