• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

1TB+ Raid0 in old computer- what controller?

Monkey34 said:
GOLD STAR for lithium726 for being the only one in thread (myself included) to actually give a suggestion to the original question.

:D

Dude - read the thread, please :)

You'll see my suggestion (quoted below for convenience)

To the OP - maybe go for something from Highpoint - their 'Rocket' range (1640 4-channel SATA RAID 5 Host Adapter - approx £80). Reasonably priced; however should you need more capacity - 2220 8 Channel SATA II Host Adaptor - approx £180.

EDIT: The above was what Lithium726 was replying to when the 'GOLD STAR' suggestion was made :D

Strike me up for a PLATINUM STAR ? :p
 
jellyhead said:
Hear, hear.

A goodly amount of contradiction too, and don't get me started on the young man's grammatical prowess :p

By the way, mikeblas, really enjoyed your neat reference to 'back up' when making reference to the chap's inability to substantiate his assertions :)



:rolleyes: he made a pun, lets give him a cookie :rolleyes:
 
Monkey34 said:
GOLD STAR for lithium726 for being the only one in thread (myself included) to actually give a suggestion to the original question.
Is that Dave Navarro?

Meanwhile, for more suggestions about finding a card, see posts [http://www.hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1029488605&postcount=3]#3[/URL] and #20. Without more details about the application, it's hard to offer more specific advice.
 
rayman2k2 said:
:rolleyes: he made a pun, lets give him a cookie :rolleyes:

No, let's instead start with some English lessons :)

Lets would imply you've perhaps rented a house to somebody, let us is in fact abbreviated to let's.

Thank you & good evening (here in the UK).
 
jellyhead said:
No, let's instead start with some English lessons :)

Lets would imply you've perhaps rented a house to somebody, let us is in fact abbreviated to let's.

Thank you & good evening (here in the UK).



English was not my first language. Give me a break.
 
rayman2k2 said:
English was not my first language. Give me a break.

Break granted - now if we could just work on your attitude :)

EDIT: Right, that's it, off to bed now. Night all.
 
jellyhead said:
Break granted - now if we could just work on your attitude :)



Personally, I think my rudeness was called for.


I had respect for mikeblas for all the work he did on YURT (see folding forum), but in this thread, he has showed me that he is narrow-minded. Don't get me wrong, I am too - but I admitted that. I told him explicitly that his opinions would not change my mind or my opininons. Yet, he forced them on me like Paris Hilton forced condoms onto her lovers (how's that for an analogy?).
 
jellyhead said:
Break granted - now if we could just work on your attitude :)

EDIT: Right, that's it, off to bed now. Night all.



Actually it would be GOODnight all, rather than Night all.


You are bidding "goodnight" to all of us, rather than bidding "night" to us - because bidding "night" to us doesn't make sense :)
 
Ok jellyhead...........I DID read the thread, but missed that one.
Here you go:

Just dont try to stick it on your forehead! :D
 
jellyhead said:
Bank or home, it matters not - it comes down to how 'mission critical' your data is to you.

If you worship your data to the point that losing it might push you to a nervous breakdown, then back it up a couple of times. For example I keep really important stuff backed up on 2 separate HDDs, with a further backup to DVD. 3 separate locations. That should do, and if it doesn't - I've taken reasonable measure, beyond which I'd file it under 'sh1t happens'. :)
QFT and ROTLFMAO at bexamous' reply :D
 
Monkey34 said:
Ok jellyhead...........I DID read the thread, but missed that one.
Here you go:

Just dont try to stick it on your forehead! :D



where's mine, i gave advice too! I demand a re-read...
 
Man... GenMay's not even this odd.

As for controller choices, Areca makes "t3h shiznit". Expect to pay accordingly. It's probably overkill for your application. HighPoint makes a decent series of RAID cards, or so I've heard. I can't use mine until I get a new motherboard in. They're about $250-275. On the cheap end of things, there's plain-old sata controllers. I like the AOC-SAT2-MV8 from SuperMicro for about $100. For the REALLY CHEAP setup, wait until your local Best Buy has a deal on 2-4 port controllers. They can get to be free after rebates. You've just got to have enough slots to set it up.
 
rayman2k2 said:
Actually it would be GOODnight all, rather than Night all.


You are bidding "goodnight" to all of us, rather than bidding "night" to us - because bidding "night" to us doesn't make sense :)

Dude - sorry to have to put you right again, but 'goodnight' isn't a word. There's a space between good & night. Again, apologies dude; however you do seem to walk in to them!

Peace.
 
Whether you respect me or not, RAID 5 is no excuse to do backups less frequently because RAID 5 arrays are not immune to failure.
 
mikeblas said:
Whether you respect me or not, RAID 5 is no excuse to do backups less frequently because RAID 5 arrays are not immune to failure.


sigh


but they are less prone to total catastrophic failure. i'm less likely to lose my data if one drive goes bad compared to RAID0, but the total amount of space is quite high for the number of drives.

ever heard of a phillips curve? RAID5 is the perfect blend of redundancy and space.
 
jellyhead said:
Dude - sorry to have to put you right again, but 'goodnight' isn't a word. There's a space between good & night. Again, apologies dude; however you do seem to walk in to them!

Peace.



space or no space, saying "night all" was still incorrect ;)


<---- more of a math/science guy. :p
 
rayman2k2 said:
but they are less prone to total catastrophic failure. i'm less likely to lose my data if one drive goes bad compared to RAID0, but the total amount of space is quite high for the number of drives.
Sure; I've never argued this, other than to point out that you still need a backup, and the higher availability of a RAID5 array means it isn't any reason to backup less frequently.

Given that you still do need a backup, RAID5 is truly a win only when availability is a high goal, as Unhappy pointed out a while ago.

"Perfect tradeoff" is very much application-dependent. That's why other useful choices are available, such as RAID6 and RAID0.
 
rayman2k2 said:
but they are less prone to total catastrophic failure. i'm less likely to lose my data if one drive goes bad compared to RAID0, but the total amount of space is quite high for the number of drives.
Sure; I've never argued this, other than to point out that you still need a backup, and the higher availability of a RAID5 array means it isn't any reason to backup less frequently.

Given that you still do need a backup, RAID5 is truly a win only when availability is a high goal, as Unhappy pointed out a while ago.

"Perfect tradeoff" is very much application-dependent. That's why other useful choices are available, such as RAID6 and RAID0.
 
mikeblas said:
Sure; I've never argued this, other than to point out that you still need a backup, and the higher availability of a RAID5 array means it isn't any reason to backup less frequently.

Given that you still do need a backup, RAID5 is truly a win only when availability is a high goal, as Unhappy pointed out a while ago.

"Perfect tradeoff" is very much application-dependent. That's why other useful choices are available, such as RAID6 and RAID0.

Double post - 50 lashes!! lol :p
 
rayman2k2 said:
space or no space, saying "night all" was still incorrect ;)


<---- more of a math/science guy. :p
Dude - the term in itself if perfectly correct; however if you're going take the stance that I should wish each & every person the appropriate farewell or greeting for their given time zone, then fair enough - I admit that perhaps I could have been a little more attentive to my audience. That said I would point out that that the internet by its very nature (always on etc.) is multi-national. Can you see where I'm going with this? :)

As for you being more of a 'math/science guy', surely you properly grasp the concept of probability and as such advocate the investment in appropriate precaution? ;)
 
jellyhead said:
Dude - the term in itself if perfectly correct; however if you're going take the stance that I should wish each & every person the appropriate farewell or greeting for their given time zone, then fair enough - I admit that perhaps I could have been a little more attentive to my audience. That said I would point out that that the internet by its very nature (always on etc.) is multi-national. Can you see where I'm going with this? :)

As for you being more of a 'math/science guy', surely you properly grasp the concept of probability and as such advocate the investment in appropriate precaution? ;)



I reeeaallly don't want to start this up again ;)


And mikeblas, that was weird, I don't remember you double posting originally :confused:
 
Back
Top