11 vid cards compared @ 1280x1024

Ooztuncer

Gawd
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
762
Hello everybody,
I opened a thread yesterday asking for a budget card around $100, but after long hours of research I changed my mind due to low resale value of the cards, and of course the technology.

I see fanatism everywhere and they generally use the terms like "will eat it alive", "are u kidding me", "what did you smoke - give me some", "screw HDR, nvidia is the performance king", etc. which personally makes my life more fun. That's why I decided to compare the cards at some specific resolution with eye candy stuff turned on. I believe this is the way the games meant to be played... Also, I wanted to include only mid to high level gpu's into this list.

Everything you see below is just the summary of 6 or 7 articles by Hilbert Hagedoon in Guru3d.com. I like the way he did his reviews because he kept the same hardware for last 8 months, which gives us apples to apples comparison (not 100% due to different versions of nvidia and catalyst drivers between the tests but I don't care too much - add/subtract couple of frames per seconds if you wish)...

Some observations during my research:

1) Especially at the high end of the spectrum there is no definite winner - performance can be changed dramatically between games. But, it is my understanding that (and only mine) ATI cards have less issues with newer technology like HDR. Furthermore, due to the techniques they use to calculate/perform/show images end users observe higher quality images compared to nvidia counterparts (don’t start flaming here). There are differences b/w people and some really don’t/cant differentiate fps differences of 75 and 95. They just let themselves go until a lag or shuttering occurs. So I conclude that when buying a card quality of the image might be more important for me after a threshold fps value. For instance, if 7900GT gives 85 fps and X1900XT gives 95 fps with worse image quality I think I will select 7900GT over X1900XT (this was just an example – may not be true

2) One should consider their monitor capabilities – this is perhaps the most important factor not to “lose” money. Why would you buy a card that will show its power at 1920 resolution where your monitor can’t display anything more than 1280x1024? Do your plan accordingly!!

3) Whereas synthetic benchmarks are useful in fanatism, I found out that it means NOTHING to me! (by comparing frames per second in real life games).

Enjoy the table below and I hope that it will help some of you. What I am going to buy – not really know but I am in b/w $130 X1800GTO (don’t know yet whether it’s a HIS brand – if it is I will unlock it to make her X1800XL) and $200 X1800XT (OEM) - price is my enemy even tough it gives the best bang for the money IMO.





PS: I prepared this for another forum but I love u guys, too :)
PS2: none of the cards above are overclocked - but I also observed that overclocking might give you 5-8 more fps on the average across the board.
PS3: Because I prepared this table for myself, I wrote down the prices that I believe I can find them - please do your own research for other price options.
 
Nice table. Add one more column...Bang for the Buck Factor. This could be calculated by averaging the total frames per second in all those games, then dividing by the price (lowest online without mail in rebates). Bigger numbers are better
 
Thanks for the table, its nice to have the ludicrous amounts of information/data summed up nicely in one chart.
 
Nice. Thank you

I don't know how accurate these prices are ut a 7900GT for 220???!!!
 
kuyaglen said:
Why no 256mb 7800GTX in most if not all recent reviews?

I believe there'll be minor performance differences b/w 256mb and 512mb cards in 1280x1024 resolution...


Yeah and X1900XTX 512 for 310?

PEOPLE: do ur own research on the prices - thats why I put question mark (?) near the "price" column... I was thinking new/used ones like this X1900XTX 512 MB for $310
 
there are 7900gts for 200-220 but most if not all are open box (not that that is bad, but no warranty or accessories

Also, who came up with these numbers...if it was you ok, but if you gathered them from various sites that is a terrible way to compare because different demos/game paths are used all the time
 
Nice on the ATi. However Open Box is not good IMO. You have many possibilities with the product. It's best, I believe, to have "New" prices. Just my opinion. Still like the "mini" guide though. ;)
 
Ooztuncer said:
I believe there'll be minor performance differences b/w 256mb and 512mb cards in 1280x1024 resolution...




PEOPLE: do ur own research on the prices - thats why I put question mark (?) near the "price" column... I was thinking new/used ones like this X1900XTX 512 MB for $310


That's a XT not XTX.
 
Ok, I am fine with Guru3d.com reviews, but gathering data to compare from tests run months apart is almost pointless. So many factors are involved
 
Back
Top