1090t Temps

[remotehugger]

I have a 1090t overclocked to 4.02 @ 1.44v and idleing at 20-21c---on prime for 2 hours i hit 48c---this is on an a noctua nh-d14---do the idle temps seem high ?

 

[TeeJay]

Not at all, in fact, your temps are what anyone would want...

 

[DrDoU]

Don't sweat those temps.

 

[remotehugger]

Thanks guys--i may just go for a little more then--lol

 

[luke51087]

lol those seem really low

 

[tinate]

I have a 1090t overclocked to 4.02 @ 1.44v and idleing at 20-21c---on prime for 2 hours i hit 48c---this is on an a noctua nh-d14---do the idle temps seem high ?

Those numbers look good. I've read dozens of times that you don't want to push these chips past 50-55C @ load.

 

[remotehugger]

I'd lke to get to 4.2 but having some ram stability problems---just hit 23240 on 3dmark vantage--woot--

 

[mesyn191]

Those numbers look good. I've read dozens of times that you don't want to push these chips past 50-55C @ load.

Looks like its closer to 62C, not 50-55. Still, that'd be a nice temp to have though.

 

[SicKlown42012]

Those temps are being reported low. At least one batch of X6s have a thermal sensor that reads low. Mine even show that I'm idling below ambient temp, which isn't possible with conventional cooling. I would add at least 7c to whatever the sensors are telling you. Even one of the review sites took the time look at the reported temps and realize that something was amiss.

[Unfortunately, we can’t tell you anything about the temperatures of an overclocked Phenom II X6 1090T. The temperature readings reported by the CPU itself are incorrect and the numbers according to all diagnostic utilities are obviously lower than the actual values. Maybe the thermal diode in the first batch of six-core processors wasn’t calibrated right, or maybe this issue should be fixed in the mainboard BIOS. However, we can estimate the thermal and electrical parameters of the overclocked processor knowing that its actual power consumption at 4.0 GHz frequency under peak load is about 260 W.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/phenom-ii-x6-1090t_10.html#sect0

 

[W.Feather]

Those temps are being reported low. At least one batch of X6s have a thermal sensor that reads low. Mine even show that I'm idling below ambient temp, which isn't possible with conventional cooling. I would add at least 7c to whatever the sensors are telling you. Even one of the review sites took the time look at the reported temps and realize that something was amiss.



http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/phenom-ii-x6-1090t_10.html#sect0

this

your temps are still nice with adding ~7 C to the temp

 

[remotehugger]

my ambient temp is high---i dont have central air and my rig is in my room which regularly hits 85 -90---i live in michigan so we dont get a ton of hot days but my window faces west so i get all the heat from about 2 oclock on into the night--its cool rite now and im showing 19c on coretemp and also on hwmonitior--liveable ---

 

[GetFunk01]

cool and quite enabled? Those temps are crazy low, with air, and no A/C in a 85f room.

 

[SicKlown42012]

cool and quite enabled? Those temps are crazy low, with air, and no A/C in a 85f room.

So crazy it's impossible. He's idling at 21c in a 29.4c room.

 

[GetFunk01]

haha, thats what i keep telling him. Though he is hell bent on those temps are right and that they are high.

 

[adobian]

I used Coretemp and Everest to read the temperatures. I noticed that the readings using both of these softwares are 20 degrees off from the reading in the bios.

So if the bios says 46 degrees Celsius at idle, in windows, both Coretemps and Everest read 26 degress Celsius at idle.

 

[W.Feather]

the BIOS is giving you the socket temp, which is typically higher than the actual core temp