I don't completely have a problem with the data in the review per say, because the data is valid (although very limited to serve a specific purpose, and subjectively left out important facts).
The issue comes more with "how" the review was presented and why.
I mean think about it. It's...
Why wasn't there a big IF when the A64 vs P4 article was done? and Why wasn't the fact that
stated during those tests as well?
WOW!!! That was The Bottom Line!!? Literally the bottom line!!! Oddly enough, it does not say "I would advise those those with highend FX 62 systems...." Instead...