ISPs’ long nightmare of having to list all the fees they charge is finally over
FCC lets ISPs stop listing all fees after companies complained it was too hard.Jon Brodkin – Jul 22, 2026 4:17 PM |
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ISPs’ long nightmare of having to list all the fees they charge is finally over
FCC lets ISPs stop listing all fees after companies complained it was too hard.
Jon Brodkin – Jul 22, 2026 4:17 PM |
Much like the rest of them. Makes for a good laugh when people suggest voting our way out of anything.Too hard..
Yet on their backend, they know exactly what ever fee is for...just do not want it to be public knowledge of how they are screwing every customer...
FCC, working for the corporations..
Its like food labeling where they can label most ingredients, but leave other things vague like "spices" and do not need to note what is in said "spices" , even though they will list out most other spices and things..We have to list our income and all that jazz on IRS long-form but the ISPs can't list what they are dinging customers for? Complete and utter bullshit.
Yup, when you see the back and forth of people moving from corps, to the FCC, or vice versa, same with other entities that are "supposed" to protect the consumer. One that comes to mind is the Heart and Stroke foundation and you see who the donor's are, or Cancer groups, and the companies "donating" to them, are literally the cause of some of the illnesses..Much like the rest of them. Makes for a good laugh when people suggest voting our way out of anything.
This, and when you vote people into power, who then go off and put others into positions that they frankly have no business being in..Grateful for our municipal broadband. Comcast spent millions lobbying against it but failed, thankfully.
The fleecing will continue as long as half of America is too distracted by bullshit culture war nonsense to demand effective government.
Does that mean ISPs will now have to list how much it will actually cost you for their service when shopping around? Or is showing the price before all taxes, fees and recouping "too hard for my wittle multibillion dollar company to do"??ISPs’ long nightmare of having to list all the fees they charge is finally over
FCC lets ISPs stop listing all fees after companies complained it was too hard.
Jon Brodkin – Jul 22, 2026 4:17 PM |
What he said.Too hard..
Yet on their backend, they know exactly what ever fee is for...just do not want it to be public knowledge of how they are screwing every customer...
FCC, working for the corporations..
Regulatory Capture. The goal of every regulated industry. Latest example is crypto.Yup, when you see the back and forth of people moving from corps, to the FCC, or vice versa, same with other entities that are "supposed" to protect the consumer.
They do not have to show it, so they can advertise say "$69.99 1Gb Internet" - but then once you dig and sign up, you can suddenly find the price higher, say $83.45 after tax and fees....Does that mean ISPs will now have to list how much it will actually cost you for their service when shopping around? Or is showing the price before all taxes, fees and recouping "too hard for my wittle multibillion dollar company to do"??
With this change, ISPs can continue advertising inaccurate prices as long as they provide the total amount of passthrough fees on broadband price labels. Separating these costs from the advertised price makes it harder for consumers to find out what they will pay each month, and gives ISPs another method of raising customer bills without announcing a price increase.
Can I move to your city?Grateful for our municipal broadband. Comcast spent millions lobbying against it but failed, thankfully.
At least in these circumstances they can make the (admittedly weak) argument that they are protecting their proprietary recipes.Its like food labeling where they can label most ingredients, but leave other things vague like "spices" and do not need to note what is in said "spices" , even though they will list out most other spices and things..
"its too hard"..claim the companies..
Grateful for our municipal broadband. Comcast spent millions lobbying against it but failed, thankfully.
The fleecing will continue as long as half of America is too distracted by bullshit culture war nonsense to demand effective government.
It would probably be worse, especially if you are out of the city limits. But I get where you're coming from.You are lucky. Every city and town should have municipal broadband, and we should drive these ISP sleazebags out of business.
They are one of the most abusive industries in existence, worse - IMHO - than the proverbial used car salesman.
In my town we have the second best solution to municipal broadband. Something unheard of in the ISP business.
At my address I actually have four separate land based ISP's competing for my business. Verizon Fios, Xfinity (Comcast), Astound (RCN), Earthlink (Essentially a fiber equivalent to MVNO's using Verizon's infrastructure, but they remain competitive)
This makes my situation better than in most of the country where people have to deal with a monopoly and the abuses that implies, but I'd still give it all up for actual municipal broadband without any hesitation. They are still sleazy, just slightly less so, and I am sure that after this ruling they will become even more so.
Do you like beer? Odell and New Belgium are both a seven-minute drive from my home.Can I move to your city?
Thanks, ObamaToo hard..
Yet on their backend, they know exactly what ever fee is for...just do not want it to be public knowledge of how they are screwing every customer...
FCC, working for the corporations..
So what exactly changed then because that it was companies like Comcast always did.They do not have to show it, so they can advertise say "$69.99 1Gb Internet" - but then once you dig and sign up, you can suddenly find the price higher, say $83.45 after tax and fees....
???Thanks, Obama
. I decided to call back and cancel or re-negotiate favorable price. After several hours and several representatives, we both agreed on the rice I liked. When the bill came, it was exactly what we negotiated.
Do you like beer? Odell and New Belgium are both a seven-minute drive from my home.
I pay $70/month for a gig up, a gig down, no data cap, the router, and local (that's 'Murican-speaking) support.
So what exactly changed then because that it was companies like Comcast always did.
The irony about that is if you try to find what is available you have to put in your exact address, so it shouldnt be "too hard" to show you the actual price, they just dont want to.
Oh well, I'm happy for my Sonic, 10Gbps fiber, no tiers you are getting fiber so you get what you get, no fuss, $50/month
Because, eh...money.Good on you, but why should it be necessary to spend several hours on the phone with a dummy , er, Comcast rep?
I didn’t realize that this is on Trump, not Obama.
? Im confused by your question. Do you not see these nice labels that show all the fees? So I think they CURRENTLY they list all the fees, no? Maybe 10 years ago it was a nightmare trying to compare internet between companies, but then this happened and it was awesome. It's not clear to me if this is going away and we're going back to how it used to be, or what. Example from comcast (my previous example was ATT):Does that mean ISPs will now have to list how much it will actually cost you for their service when shopping around? Or is showing the price before all taxes, fees and recouping "too hard for my wittle multibillion dollar company to do"??