• Some users have recently had their accounts hijacked. It seems that the now defunct EVGA forums might have compromised your password there and seems many are using the same PW here. We would suggest you UPDATE YOUR PASSWORD and TURN ON 2FA for your account here to further secure it. None of the compromised accounts had 2FA turned on.
    Once you have enabled 2FA, your account will be updated soon to show a badge, letting other members know that you use 2FA to protect your account. This should be beneficial for everyone that uses FSFT.

Next Xbox won’t be cheap — Sarah Bond teases a “very premium, high-end next-gen console experience”

Microsoft has the best leverage when it comes to getting the best deals. If RAM and storage were a problem then talk to CXMT.
They charge the same price for the same specs than the others right now, not sure why it would change, it is not like they are in search of clients.

Their yield are not as good and they have no problem selling everything they do.... And they are quite focused on HBM for the chinese market, so not sure if that will change anytime soon.
 
I just hope they don't go the Series S route and have a lower spec console, or if they do, do it right (don't change the specs, lower the SSD or remove the optical drive, etc).
there is an unofficial successor to the series S planned. it is AMD's successor to Z2 extreme chip — known as Medusa Premium. it is expected to have same cpu but 1/3rd the GPU of helix/magnus/series X2.

it is basically a premium laptop chip that will do double duty in both handhelds & windows competitors to steam machines. price would be in the same range as current handheld or steam machine as this (laptop) chip will be exclusively in 3rd party OEM systems (running normal Windows but booting to xbox mode) unlike Helix (that will be a proper console running xbox o/s in hypervisor )
 
You know it's bad when they show you the monthly cost first.
$552 for the X if you figure $12/mo for gp ultimate. Expensive, but only $50 more than straight-up. And you get Game Pass...if you care about that.
 
Essentially what they're talking about is streaming and subscription services, which is worse. But if they don't want Xbox to die then they will need to do something to bring prices down. A $1000+ console is a non-starter for most. At that point many would just prefer to get a gaming PC.
 
Essentially what they're talking about is streaming and subscription services, which is worse. But if they don't want Xbox to die then they will need to do something to bring prices down. A $1000+ console is a non-starter for most. At that point many would just prefer to get a gaming PC.
premium console was always a crazy plan. now they need to initiate backup plan & bring in the successor for series S (next gen handheld/laptop chip that has 1/3rd the GPU power of Helix)
 
Speaking to Fortune, Sharma observed that platforms have reached a stage where it is difficult to expect consumers "to spend thousands of dollars on a console generation".

"We must think about the cost construction of consoles and how we create different plans, partnerships that will allow us to have better distribution, and experiences that we're creating outside of that to reach new audiences."

"We will continue to look at new business models – that's what is needed for consoles rather than just the most premium, high-performance console in the world."

https://www.gamesindustry.biz/xbox-...cy-and-exclusive-titles-over-premium-hardware
 
Speaking to Fortune, Sharma observed that platforms have reached a stage where it is difficult to expect consumers "to spend thousands of dollars on a console generation".

"We must think about the cost construction of consoles and how we create different plans, partnerships that will allow us to have better distribution, and experiences that we're creating outside of that to reach new audiences."

"We will continue to look at new business models – that's what is needed for consoles rather than just the most premium, high-performance console in the world."

https://www.gamesindustry.biz/xbox-...cy-and-exclusive-titles-over-premium-hardware

Later in the interview, Sharma reiterated that Project Helix will be able to play PC games and, despite all the talk about cost, will still offer “leading-edge performance”.

“But there’s material work to do to make sure that it is available to the people that want to play. And so we’re working on that,” she said.

https://www.videogameschronicle.com...s-models-to-make-its-next-console-affordable/
 
Later in the interview, Sharma reiterated that Project Helix will be able to play PC games and, despite all the talk about cost, will still offer “leading-edge performance”.

“But there’s material work to do to make sure that it is available to the people that want to play. And so we’re working on that,” she said.

https://www.videogameschronicle.com...s-models-to-make-its-next-console-affordable/
looks like they'll cut down memory & storage but optimize software to use both more efficiently
 
Speaking to Fortune, Sharma observed that platforms have reached a stage where it is difficult to expect consumers "to spend thousands of dollars on a console generation".

"We must think about the cost construction of consoles and how we create different plans, partnerships that will allow us to have better distribution, and experiences that we're creating outside of that to reach new audiences."

"We will continue to look at new business models – that's what is needed for consoles rather than just the most premium, high-performance console in the world."

https://www.gamesindustry.biz/xbox-...cy-and-exclusive-titles-over-premium-hardware

When I read those two quotes I hear one thing .... advertising ... lots of advertising. Partnerships basically means serving more and more advertising so they can offset the cost of the console. Business models, partnerships, thinking "creatively" all means worsening the customer experience to squeeze a few more dollars out.
 
When I read those two quotes I hear one thing .... advertising ... lots of advertising. Partnerships basically means serving more and more advertising so they can offset the cost of the console. Business models, partnerships, thinking "creatively" all means worsening the customer experience to squeeze a few more dollars out.

Rent a console. Microsoft loans/pay in 'x' payments for a console. Pay by the hour Microsoft cybercafes with only Xbox Helixes. 😁
 
Rent a console. Microsoft loans/pay in 'x' payments for a console. Pay by the hour Microsoft cybercafes with only Xbox Helixes. 😁
Or just look in the trash and find an Xbox One X like I did. Someone threw away a perfectly working Xbox One X, including the 1TB drive. They even took the time to reset the machine to make sure nobody could get their games. I did take it apart and dunked it in water multiple times as it had roaches. Too bad nobody hacked it yet because this thing is useless to me. Also gotta say I spent 30 minutes logging into the device because it's not as simple as turning it on and playing games. Last time I used my Xbox account was with my 360, which I still have laying around. I spent more time logging in then I do installing Linux on my PC.

If Microsoft wants to move forward then logging in should be optional on Xbox. This thing is going to collect dust in the corner of my room until someone properly hacks it.
 
Rent a console. Microsoft loans/pay in 'x' payments for a console. Pay by the hour Microsoft cybercafes with only Xbox Helixes. 😁
They want to move away from hardware and move everyone to cloud gaming. GP is just a way to slowly condition people to it.
 
They want to move away from hardware and move everyone to cloud gaming. GP is just a way to slowly condition people to it.
The cloud push isn't so strong under Sharma. She realizes that the hardware and games have to be compelling before you can even think about a Game Pass subscription; hell, she even lowered the price so that it's less of a profit driver.

I'm sure Microsoft would love it if everyone had a Game Pass sub and that your Xbox's drive was just for those few games you couldn't stream. But, to abuse cliches, Microsoft needs to learn how to walk before it can run; the Xbos needs to be good first.
 
The cloud push isn't so strong under Sharma. She realizes that the hardware and games have to be compelling before you can even think about a Game Pass subscription; hell, she even lowered the price so that it's less of a profit driver.

I'm sure Microsoft would love it if everyone had a Game Pass sub and that your Xbox's drive was just for those few games you couldn't stream. But, to abuse cliches, Microsoft needs to learn how to walk before it can run; the Xbos needs to be good first.
Give it time. They trying to win back people atm. I 100% believe Helix is going to be digital only and after the Helix there will be a huge push to cloud gaming.
 
I'm sure Microsoft would love it if everyone had a Game Pass sub
Phil Spencer lied that gamepass subscriptions would grow to 100 million. but it is stuck now. so they'll have to start removing day & date on a gradual basis (&/ restrict it to the very ultimate tiers).
 
Give it time. They trying to win back people atm. I 100% believe Helix is going to be digital only and after the Helix there will be a huge push to cloud gaming.
That does delay Microsoft's dream by several years if it happens, mind you...

I agree that Helix will be digital-only at the least. It'll likely arrive seven years after Xbox Series X/S, and that was the start of the disc phase-out; Microsoft's not going to try to keep physical media alive for another few years after that, especially not when it raises console prices. I just think downloads will dominate for a while to come.
 
Give it time. They trying to win back people atm. I 100% believe Helix is going to be digital only and after the Helix there will be a huge push to cloud gaming.

Cloud gaming just doesn’t work for much

I have 10GbE in the house and using moonlight or steam link to stream from Steam to my living room is still shit. Playing FFVII Remake/Rebirth is a terrible experience. Of course, my various boxes receiving the stream aren’t 10GbE, but input latency is still the big issue when streaming 4k games
 
Cloud gaming just doesn’t work for much

I have 10GbE in the house and using moonlight or steam link to stream from Steam to my living room is still shit. Playing FFVII Remake/Rebirth is a terrible experience. Of course, my various boxes receiving the stream aren’t 10GbE, but input latency is still the big issue when streaming 4k games
They dont care about the experience they want all the control and you to own nothing. The structure is everyone using the cloud from a dumb terminal. Paying a subscription for everything.
 
They dont care about the experience they want all the control and you to own nothing. The structure is everyone using the cloud from a dumb terminal. Paying a subscription for everything.

Exactly, they don't care about latency or low frame rates or low image quality. Just like most people are fine with streaming movies, most will be fine with streaming games. People should fight hard against the transition to streaming/subscriptions.
 
Exactly, they don't care about latency or low frame rates or low image quality. Just like most people are fine with streaming movies, most will be fine with streaming games. People should fight hard against the transition to streaming/subscriptions.
I don't think we have to fight, because few people going for it. Cloud gaming is just a nightmare of legal problems and performance issues. Streaming movies works because movies do inherently work well with streaming. Streaming games doesn't work because latency is a real issue and people have a problem with a service that will get better and worse based on the time of day. My 300 Mbps is not that speed all day long. Right now it's 260, but at 5PM it's around 150. There's no reliable way to make cloud gaming work.

Subscriptions are going the way of the Dodo and it's not because of torrenting. Just Google bestfreestreaming and you'll see how easy it is to watch movies without flagging yourself from your ISP. You don't need Plex anymore. They even have apps you can install on your FireStick to watch these sites.
 
I don't think we have to fight, because few people going for it. Cloud gaming is just a nightmare of legal problems and performance issues. Streaming movies works because movies do inherently work well with streaming. Streaming games doesn't work because latency is a real issue and people have a problem with a service that will get better and worse based on the time of day. My 300 Mbps is not that speed all day long. Right now it's 260, but at 5PM it's around 150. There's no reliable way to make cloud gaming work.

Subscriptions are going the way of the Dodo and it's not because of torrenting. Just Google bestfreestreaming and you'll see how easy it is to watch movies without flagging yourself from your ISP. You don't need Plex anymore. They even have apps you can install on your FireStick to watch these sites.

I'd like to share your optimism, but I don't. I don't think the average gamer knows or cares about latency. I think Microsoft's attempt to make gaming subscription based (and eventually streaming) will return, even if by a different company, in the future. I'd love to be wrong of course.
 
I'd like to share your optimism, but I don't. I don't think the average gamer knows or cares about latency. I think Microsoft's attempt to make gaming subscription based (and eventually streaming) will return, even if by a different company, in the future. I'd love to be wrong of course.
Then let me put your worries to ease because we've been down this rabbit hole a half dozen times. No cloud gaming services has survived for very long, like Stadia. Even Nvidia who's been in the cloud gaming market the longest had to rebrand it a number of times. Geforce Now was known as Grid which not only required you to buy the games but to pay a monthly fee to play them, much like Stadia did. This obvious didn't work so Nvidia moved to still requiring you to buy games but the games will also work on Steam. This also didn't work. Geforce Now is just a monthly fee that lets you play games you own, but with many limits. For $20 not only you gotta own the game but you're limited to 8 hours before you could be kicked off. Plus, not all games work on Geforce Now due to legal reasons. Then there's Sony's Playstation Plus which is also $20 a month and no limits beyond storage, plus you don't need to buy the games. Sony doesn't release the amount of gamers using their cloud gaming service, but we do know there's 23.7 million subscribers when it comes to PlayStation Plus Premium membership. It doesn't look good when a company doesn't release numbers.

Also yes latency does matter. Either people don't realize they care about latency or aren't aware of it's effects on gaming. Besides that the main reason why you want 60fps over 30fps is because of latency, but it's also the reason why you want a high refresh rate monitor to go with it. It not only gives you a better gaming experience but also gives you a competitive edge. We're talking about people who still use PS/2 ports over USB for keyboards and mice for this reason. It's the reason why we buy 1ms monitors. We have people who buy expensive composite to HDMI adapters so they don't experience latency with old game consoles. Like it or not, low latency is king. There is no reason to believe that people in mass are willing sacrifice latency just to play cloud gaming.
 
Streaming games doesn't work because latency is a real issue and people have a problem with a service that will get better and worse based on the time of day. My 300 Mbps is not that speed all day long. Right now it's 260, but at 5PM it's around 150. There's no reliable way to make cloud gaming work.
I am not sure about the legals problems part ? but 150 Mbps is of course more than enough to stream game perfectly fine.

Also yes latency does matter. Either people don't realize they care about latency or aren't aware of it's effects on gaming.
Lot of people do play game on consoles too, who tend to have way worse latency than streaming in 360fps mode... (end-to-end real latency of 30-40ms, which is often over 50 to 100ms on a console for a multipleayer game), for a lot of people changing to Nvidia cloud would not be sacrificying latency, it would be gaining a lower one.
 
I am not sure about the legals problems part ? but 150 Mbps is of course more than enough to stream game perfectly fine.


Lot of people do play game on consoles too, who tend to have way worse latency than streaming in 360fps mode... (end-to-end real latency of 30-40ms, which is often over 50 to 100ms on a console for a multipleayer game), for a lot of people changing to Nvidia cloud would not be sacrificying latency, it would be gaining a lower one.

It is not. Not by a long shot.
I stream locally in the house in a 10GbE network from a 3080Ti machine to a myriad of devices and they are all terrible at it except the minipc that also has a 10GbE NIC in it.
Most TV’s and streaming devices have FE or a neutered GbE NIC that gets maybe 200Mbps throughout.
 
It is not. Not by a long shot.
I stream locally in the house in a 10GbE network from a 3080Ti machine to a myriad of devices and they are all terrible at it except the minipc that also has a 10GbE NIC in it.
Most TV’s and streaming devices have FE or a neutered GbE NIC that gets maybe 200Mbps throughout.
You have 10 Gb internet? Or you're just using 10 GbE ports?
 
It is not. Not by a long shot.

Agreed. But internet access and quality is improving world wide. We can talk about failed attempts in the past, but the infrastructure and service is better now. Previous attempts were too soon. They will try again, and I assume the typical consumer will go for it regardless.
 
I am not sure about the legals problems part ? but 150 Mbps is of course more than enough to stream game perfectly fine.
It's not always 150 Mbps. Keep in mind if other family members are using that connection, it will get worse.
Lot of people do play game on consoles too, who tend to have way worse latency than streaming in 360fps mode... (end-to-end real latency of 30-40ms, which is often over 50 to 100ms on a console for a multipleayer game), for a lot of people changing to Nvidia cloud would not be sacrificying latency, it would be gaining a lower one.
Yes but, you're suggesting people to use those same consoles to play cloud gaming. A powerful PC is going to experience cloud gaming better than a FireStick, just due to the inherit nature of the PC being a low latency powerful machine. When Stadia was a thing, the use of FireTV Sticks had a dramatic latency increase over a desktop PC. The 4k sticks were better but not PC better. Latency is cumulative, and subtractive. If the hardware has latency then cloud gaming will just add on top of it, making the overall experience worse.


View: https://youtu.be/lcv9QWwv2KY?si=6TTVszk4W2BDoiIH
 
It is not. Not by a long shot.
Geforce now peak usage is around 100mbps, which is quite more than Disney+ 4k streaming, quality of the video compression matter here of course, but you should try it.. I really doubt the issue you have is with 1gbps (or 10?) being too slow, latency of your setup maybe more than raw bandwith ? The server used to compress the video stream of the game use RTX 6000 gpus that have extremelly fast compression capacity.

Yes but, you're suggesting people to use those same consoles to play cloud gaming. A powerful PC is going to experience cloud gaming better than a FireStick
A console (or firestick), a smarthphone can have quite fast hardware x265 (or av1 or the future one), that make that part faster than the 40-60fps consoles without Reflex on, the TV vs compute rmonitor, controller part sure, but the firestick streaming can easily have as good or better latency than what consoles gamers have been used too.
 
Back
Top