Nobu
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2007
- Messages
- 10,054
in fact, I would say pricing is a product of their lack of fab space and refusal to outsource the production.It's not just pricing. Its also a lack of product refreshes and new models as well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
in fact, I would say pricing is a product of their lack of fab space and refusal to outsource the production.It's not just pricing. Its also a lack of product refreshes and new models as well.
It's margins. Intel saw writing on wall well before the 89 dollar per terabyte we see today.It's not just pricing. Its also a lack of product refreshes and new models as well.
so they poached losers from a losing side of the GPU war? I think Intel is getting raw end of the deal
Yeeees ... And no... Budgets aren't magic though... Often the opposite is true. Intels 10nm is something that 'unlimited budgets' should be able more likely fix, and yet...The reality was more like very smart people hamstrung by budget, as AMD fought a two front war GPUs and CPUs. So the graphics division showed up to the fight with knives while Nvidia rolled up with tanks.
Now let's see what happens when the same people are given an Intel sized budget. Things are going to be very different I reckon. There is no doubt each one of these acquisitions is very calculated on Intel's part - they have very specific rationale for each one.