GTA IV - The most over rated game in history?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Flogger23m

[H]F Junkie
Joined
Jun 19, 2009
Messages
14,373
Recently decided to give GTA IV a try after having it for a few years. It got a lot of high reviews so I figured I would play it. I had no idea just how bad of a game it is in every way possible. Can someone explain to me why people give this game/series such positive reviews? It is down right broken in most areas. Quality is low throughout and there is absolutely nothing fun or well done in the game. After managing to get it to run (a pain in itself) I found the following shortcomings:

- Heavy DRM. Three layers, two client programs. I assume three if you use Steam.

- Horrible driving mechanics. If you drive over ~20 MPH and try to turn your car will skid around in circles. I assume the developers never drove a car before...

- No functional or practical fast travel. You can flag a taxi, but when you attempt to enter you just pull the guy out and steal it. Making the whole flagging mechanic pointless. There is a train, but driving to a station (and avoiding cops) takes just as long as driving to your destination.

- No save system. Game partially saves occasionally, otherwise you have to spend 20-40 minutes going to a safe house to save your game.

- Trigger happy cops. With such poor driving mechanics you often bump into police cars. Or another car pushes you into one. As much as scratching the pain results in 20 officers swarming and shooting at you.

- Trigger happy cops when walking. Accidentally rub shoulders with a cop? Repeat of above.

- 1/5th of the cars on the road are police. See above two points. Enjoy waiting around for all cops to leave so you can steal a car.

- Some of the worst shooting and fighting mechanics in history.

- No pausing of cutscenes. No replaying of cutscenes. No save system means if you missed one, prepare to replay 1-2 hours of gameplay if you want to see a cutscene that you missed.

- No real story. Some background is given, but otherwise it is just dumb characters swearing and rambling about meaningless stuff that adds up to nothing.

- Terrible weapon/inventory management system. Actually, there isn't one.

- 4-5 cars can be chasing you, dumping bullets into your car. You'll drive past cops and they'll do nothing. But then you'll accidentally rub against a police car. 20 cops spawn and chase you around ignoring your attackers.

- Missions are really poorly done. A good portion of them are you moving you a yellow arrow, the screen fading to black, then reappearing outside. If there is more to the mission it tends to be poorly done. Move here, avoid cops, follow him, bumped into a cop, got too far from target trying to evade cops. Mission failed.

- No place to buy/store cars.

- Whenever the game does choose to "save" and you want to revert to it, you'll find that the game did not actually save everything. Your location is reset, as is your money, weapons, and car.

- Slow controls. What you enter the map? Watch the screen fade to black, but the game continues going for a few seconds while you loose control... and your character may accidentally run or crash into a cop. Exit the menu, evade cops...

- Odd default control layout.

- Really bad graphics. They're more similar to a PS2 than a PS3, and absolutely terrible for a game released in 2008. Other games from the era like Far Cry 2 and Crysis simply blow the game away graphically.

- No point in using silent weapons like a baseball bat. Because the cops will detect you if you hit someone with it. Even if you are alone in a building with only your victim.

- No real depth to anything.


Just some things off the top of my head. After finally getting the game to work (required some work around that modders figured out) and installing a mod to disable one of the clients (ICEnhancer) I found out how terrible the game was. But I really was just amazed at how bad it was. So much so that I continued to play it just to see how bad it can get. It continues to amaze me at how poorly implemented just about everything is. At about ~8 hours in I think I am done with the game because I don't think there is much else to see.

So I ask those that enjoyed this game, what was it that you liked about it? If you managed to read the whole post, then I applaud your attention span. :D
 
Thought it was alright myself just gets a bit boring and repetitive.

I didn't 'like' any of the characters.

Niko is no Tommy Vercetti
 
It's populear amongst the younger crowd as I see it.
If you grew up with PC's in their "childhood" and the games of that era (not visually stunning, but with HARD gameplay and good storylines) I fully agree with you.

It's a bad consoleport and it shows.
The game is not very good.and it shows.
I liked GTA 1
I don't care much for it successors.
 
In its time it wasn't half bad, we were willing to put up with the crappy car handling for the good looks and that classic GTA experience. Once the games handling is modded etc, its truly a great title. GTAV did deserve its high marks though.
 
GTA games actually have amongst the most realistic driving physics for any non-simulation game. The only game beating it is Mafia.

Just try going over 20mph and quickly turn your steering wheel to full lock, you're guaranteed to skid IRL too.

As for the game being bad, that cannot be farther from the truth. If you think GTAIV is a bad game, you are lucky, because you haven'T seen a really bad game yet.

There are some repetitive elements in it, like hanging with friends, or driving to mission locations, but they're all optional. You're not forced to engage in those activities.

The only valid point in my opinion that you have is the unlikeable characters.

Game mechanics are pretty good actually, just check out the fighting mechanics in the first driver game that had out of car action, and then come back and tell me GTA's mechanics are bad, I dare you.
 
Last edited:
@Flogger23m. I agree with you completely. Not only is everything you said 100% true, the story was so boring that I can't complete it. It is one of the worst games I've ever subjected myself to because the crowd kept telling me that it was so good.

I bought the game on XBOX and gave it away to my nephew for helping me clean my house. Then I bought it on PC because it was supposed to be so much better. I lost those discs when I moved to another city. Then I bought it again for PC when I left there with the extra missions because they were going to make the game good finally. Then there was a Steam sale and I bought it again so I wouldn't have to ever buy it again because Steam is digital.

Maybe one day I will force myself to sit down and play it through. I owned Vice City and San Andreas in the past. I absolutely loved those games! GTA IV just never appealed to me. The online multiplayer is darn fun though. That's the only thing that I'm remotely excited about for GTA V.

If it wasn't for the hype birds on my friend's list begging me to buy GTA V, I'd wait until it was on a 75% off sale. That's how "excited" I am to play it. I bet the story is as bad as GTA IV. I expect nothing else.
 
Nostalgia maybe? Like one of the guys above It was not half bad when it came out. I never really heard of amazing reviews from the game So I dont think it is necessarily overated.

Me an my friends would get stoned and see who could last the longest and get the most stars while going on a killing spree. Basically my entire experience for the game until I got it on pc some 3 years after release.

You want a hyped game? GTA V. That game was fun and all but damn people made it out to be the best game ever made. The characters are ok but Vice city will remain the gold standard for grand theft auto games and nothing can compare.

@Flogger23m. I agree with you completely. Not only is everything you said 100% true, the story was so boring that I can't complete it. It is one of the worst games I've ever subjected myself to because the crowd kept telling me that it was so good.

I bought the game on XBOX and gave it away to my nephew for helping me clean my house. Then I bought it on PC because it was supposed to be so much better. I lost those discs when I moved to another city. Then I bought it again for PC when I left there with the extra missions because they were going to make the game good finally. Then there was a Steam sale and I bought it again so I wouldn't have to ever buy it again because Steam is digital.

Maybe one day I will force myself to sit down and play it through. I owned Vice City and San Andreas in the past. I absolutely loved those games! GTA IV just never appealed to me. The online multiplayer is darn fun though. That's the only thing that I'm remotely excited about for GTA V.

If it wasn't for the hype birds on my friend's list begging me to buy GTA V, I'd wait until it was on a 75% off sale. That's how "excited" I am to play it. I bet the story is as bad as GTA IV. I expect nothing else.
Wait you bought the game 4 times? I haven't played a single game in my life since N64 that is worth buying twice let alone 4.
 
Well doing a drive by on a bicycle in San Andreas was pretty damn neat to me. I loved Vice City, but San Andreas had me hooked from moment one.
 
Shocked you didn't mention the ridiculous levels of z-fighting in that game.

I attempted to play GTA IV on a myriad amount of GPUs: ATI Mobility laptop cards, SLI 9800GTX+, AMD 7770, AMD 7950, Nvida GTX 770...every machine I've ever owned or built. I had read something about a mod that minimizes the z-fighting, but by then I had given up trying to work with that godawful POS game.

San Andreas was absolutely amazing.
 
Last edited:
Almost all of your points are either a result of shameless exaggeration or, just ignorance towards the game mechanics and how to use them.

Recently decided to give GTA IV a try after having it for a few years. It got a lot of high reviews so I figured I would play it. I had no idea just how bad of a game it is in every way possible. Can someone explain to me why people give this game/series such positive reviews? It is down right broken in most areas. Quality is low throughout and there is absolutely nothing fun or well done in the game. After managing to get it to run (a pain in itself) I found the following shortcomings:

- Heavy DRM. Three layers, two client programs. I assume three if you use Steam.
DRM has no relation to how good or bad the game actually is or was. Yeah you have to install a client program once. if you use steam you already have that installed, so you can't blame GTAIV for requiring steam if you purchased it over steam.
- Horrible driving mechanics. If you drive over ~20 MPH and try to turn your car will skid around in circles. I assume the developers never drove a car before...
As I explained above the game has amongst the best driving mechanics of any action game I know. Some aspects might be exaggerated in it slightly for fun factor. (the suspension of cars is very soft, and top speed is very limited) But overall the cars behave as I expect them to behave under those circumstances. And I'm an avid car simulation fan, so I crave realism in driving, I ditch games that have poor driving realism. You have to bear in mind that when you drive in the game you don't drive like you drive on public roads, you drive like a maniac, with no sense of fear and speed. I don't want you to try and apply that driving style on public roads, just to prove a point, because you might end up killing someone. I have no reason to lie to you, it's fact that GTAIV and previous gta games as well had very realistic driving physics. That doesn't mean you have to like it, you can hate it still, there is no problem with that. Just don't blame it on being unrealistic. Say I don't like the driving mechanics, because you can't do 90 degree turns over 20mph instantly.
- No functional or practical fast travel. You can flag a taxi, but when you attempt to enter you just pull the guy out and steal it. Making the whole flagging mechanic pointless. There is a train, but driving to a station (and avoiding cops) takes just as long as driving to your destination.
You actually have to use a different button, or hold down the button for longer (I don't remember which one, I didn't play the game for a very long time) to enter cars as a passenger. You can also use the train as a passenger, you don't have to hijack it. But using the taxi works perfectly as fast travel. You don't even have to flag one, because you can call a cab on the phone.
- No save system. Game partially saves occasionally, otherwise you have to spend 20-40 minutes going to a safe house to save your game.
You mean 20-40 seconds right? There is exaggeration, and then there is what you're doing here.

- Trigger happy cops. With such poor driving mechanics you often bump into police cars. Or another car pushes you into one. As much as scratching the pain results in 20 officers swarming and shooting at you.
The way I remember they only start shooting at you if you try to get away, or try to hurt them.

- Trigger happy cops when walking. Accidentally rub shoulders with a cop? Repeat of above.
Yes repeat of the above, they only shoot you if you try to run away. Again I don't want to dare you to rub shoulders with a real cop, and when he tries to stop you run away, see what happens.

- 1/5th of the cars on the road are police. See above two points. Enjoy waiting around for all cops to leave so you can steal a car.
I don't remember any such thing, you're just hugely exaggerating again. It's pretty easy to steal cars undetected. I always tried to steal parked cars in the street, because carjacking is just too violent way of getting a ride.

- Some of the worst shooting and fighting mechanics in history.
See my last post.

- No pausing of cutscenes. No replaying of cutscenes. No save system means if you missed one, prepare to replay 1-2 hours of gameplay if you want to see a cutscene that you missed.
I'm not really sure what you mean here. How can you miss a cutscene? Ah I know, you mean when you're called away from the computer during a cutscene. Yes I give you that point, but then again 99% of all games I played suffer the same problem, this doesn't make GTA worst game ever.

- No real story. Some background is given, but otherwise it is just dumb characters swearing and rambling about meaningless stuff that adds up to nothing.
I concede this point, not much of a story to speak of.

- Terrible weapon/inventory management system. Actually, there isn't one.
What is there to manage? You have weapons, you can change between them, what else do you expect or need?

- 4-5 cars can be chasing you, dumping bullets into your car. You'll drive past cops and they'll do nothing. But then you'll accidentally rub against a police car. 20 cops spawn and chase you around ignoring your attackers.
Again I concede cops ignore everyone else besides you. The same can be said for Mafia games, so it still doesn't make GTA worse or better.
- Missions are really poorly done. A good portion of them are you moving you a yellow arrow, the screen fading to black, then reappearing outside. If there is more to the mission it tends to be poorly done. Move here, avoid cops, follow him, bumped into a cop, got too far from target trying to evade cops. Mission failed.
I'm not sure what is your point here. It's the goal of the game to evade cops and do jobs while doing that. You can dislike this goal, but it's not a flaw of the game. I don't like turn based strategy games, does that make those games bad? No.
- No place to buy/store cars.
You can store two cars in the parking spot in front of all safe houses. You can't buy them, but there in not much point to buy them anyway. Just steal and respray and you own it.

- Whenever the game does choose to "save" and you want to revert to it, you'll find that the game did not actually save everything. Your location is reset, as is your money, weapons, and car.
That's the game mechanic, if you want everything stored you have to go to a safe house and save manually. Again it's a question of like it or not and not good or bad. You can argue that it's pointless to make you visit a safe house after each mission. But it's a difficulty factor, and a choice. Either you risk loosing your items or you make the effort.

- Slow controls. What you enter the map? Watch the screen fade to black, but the game continues going for a few seconds while you loose control... and your character may accidentally run or crash into a cop. Exit the menu, evade cops...
Slow controls means something entirely different. You should stop or at least slow down before you start looking at your map, IRL too.

- Odd default control layout.
And that is a problem how? It's fully customizable, if you can't be bothered to set up the controls it's not the game's problem.
- Really bad graphics. They're more similar to a PS2 than a PS3, and absolutely terrible for a game released in 2008. Other games from the era like Far Cry 2 and Crysis simply blow the game away graphically.
Actually it has really good graphics, even today. Especially during the night. When I first saw it I was so amazed by the atmosphere and the looks that I couldn't find words. FarCry2 can't even compare.

- No point in using silent weapons like a baseball bat. Because the cops will detect you if you hit someone with it. Even if you are alone in a building with only your victim.
True, psychic cops. Like in any elder scrolls, where everyone is capable of detect any stolen goods on you. I'm not saying it is good, I'm just saying that this doesn't immediately make it a bad game. You can find flaws with any games.

- No real depth to anything.
That's just an empty statement. I can't argue with that. The game has as much depth as much you give to it, by staying in character. If you go and run around like a lunatic It's gets old very quickly. But I stayed in character most of the time.

So I ask those that enjoyed this game, what was it that you liked about it? If you managed to read the whole post, then I applaud your attention span. :D
The biggest selling point of the game for me was believe it or not driving mechanics. And then graphics. And then fighting mechanics. And fun factor. And the expansion (liberty city something) actually has some good characters, and an OK story. No more niko bellic bullshit. So I enjoyed that even more than the base game, which I mostly enjoyed only for the sandbox style and the mechanics.
 
GTA games actually have amongst the most realistic driving physics for any non-simulation game. The only game beating it is Mafia.

Just try going over 20mph and quickly turn your steering wheel to full lock, you're guaranteed to skid IRL too.

As for the game being bad, that cannot be farther from the truth. If you think GTAIV is a bad game, you are lucky, because you haven'T seen a really bad game yet.

There are some repetitive elements in it, like hanging with friends, or driving to mission locations, but they're all optional. You're not forced to engage in those activities.

The only valid point in my opinion that you have is the unlikeable characters.

Game mechanics are pretty good actually, just check out the fighting mechanics in the first driver game that had out of car action, and then come back and tell me GTA's mechanics are bad, I dare you.

That's about how I felt. Not the best GTA but not nearly as bad as people make it out to be. GTA5 does greatly improve this and blows GTA4 away.
 
People like it because of the whole open world New York City urban setting with some tidbit RP elements. You know, it makes them feel like they're in the city doing their thing, being a boss, etc. I never got it, but it seems to do it for a lot of people who're into that mindset.

I don't even like GTA V to be honest, the heists are all shallow minigames if not just boring shooting sequences and the rest is all cloyingly referential hurr-durr look this is what murica is like! crap. Boring shit.

At least the driving was good in GTA IV.
 
I thought the driving physics were good in 4, with a whole complex suspension system?
 
lol

I stopped reading when the OP said you had to steal taxi's as I assumed it must be a troll as it's quite easy to get in the back seat of a cab that you wave down.

qq
 
It's populear amongst the younger crowd as I see it

I've never played any of the GTA games as I've always seen it as a game that appeals to high school kids...I enjoyed Sleeping Dogs a lot and even Watch Dogs but GTA just seems like low brow entertainment...nothing wrong with that but the focus seems all about the sex and violence which other games have done better...doesn't seem to be any real depth to this series and yet it keeps getting mentioned in the 'Best Games of All Time' lists so for that reason I'm curious
 
I'm frankly surprised by the replies here, as it seems like everyone can't stop jacking off to GTA V.
 
GTA games actually have amongst the most realistic driving physics for any non-simulation game. The only game beating it is Mafia.

Just try going over 20mph and quickly turn your steering wheel to full lock, you're guaranteed to skid IRL too.

Bingo, that's exactly what I was thinking as well. Given that the game is being played on a PC, I'm assuming the OP is using a mouse and keyboard. As we all know, WASD is not analog input, so you are either TURNING or NOT TURNING, which means wheel straight versus wheel at full lock.

Try driving any car at any speed above parking lot speeds and INSTANTLY turn the wheel to full lock...and you're gonna either understeer or oversteer, depending on configuration of the car (although most cars understeer from the factory for safety reasons).

Unfortunately that is a limitation of the port itself, in that it doesn't really have good controller support. You can't blame the vehicle physics, though, as they're modeled pretty accurately.
 
I've never played any of the GTA games as I've always seen it as a game that appeals to high school kids...I enjoyed Sleeping Dogs a lot and even Watch Dogs but GTA just seems like low brow entertainment...nothing wrong with that but the focus seems all about the sex and violence which other games have done better...doesn't seem to be any real depth to this series and yet it keeps getting mentioned in the 'Best Games of All Time' lists so for that reason I'm curious

You never played the game yet you have an opinion on it. I wonder how accurate it is then. It's already very obvious that not very accurate since sex is not the focus of the game at all.
 
M76 has it spot-on in his exhaustive break-down.

DRM is entirely political and while yes, it sucks balls, it has nothing to do with the quality of the game. Plenty of good games have or have had shitty DRM.

Escaping the cops has been a central mechanic of GTA since #1, and winding them up to higher and higher alert states through outrageous acts of wanton destruction, and then trying to get away, is a game in itself.

Comparing it visually with Crysis is laughable. Crysis never attempted to draw a large, seamless city, it's another corridor shooter. GTA4 could have performed better, certainly, one of the later patches in particular actually managed to make it worse, and Mafia 2 had a much slicker engine (but was an absolute fucking abortion of a game IMO), but GTA4 was also intentionally stylised, it's not supposed to be photoreal. And it didn't crash for me once in around 200 hours of game time. That's virtually unheard of these days. But I'm from an old-school generation of gamers who isn't afraid to turn down the graphics settings a bit.

If you hate the game so much, take solace in the peanuts you undoubtedly paid for it (It cost me a ridiculous $7.49 or something, several years ago) and move on to something else.

But what do I know, I actually quite liked Niko and his sly "this is my life, then" melancholy. Fucking Roman can DIAF.
 
While GTA4 certainly has issues, I still think it did the best job of making you feel like you were in a real place of any game ever. The "vibe" of the game actually makes me overlook how many flaws it has/had.
 
M76 has it spot-on in his exhaustive break-down.

DRM is entirely political and while yes, it sucks balls, it has nothing to do with the quality of the game. Plenty of good games have or have had shitty DRM.

Escaping the cops has been a central mechanic of GTA since #1, and winding them up to higher and higher alert states through outrageous acts of wanton destruction, and then trying to get away, is a game in itself.

Comparing it visually with Crysis is laughable. Crysis never attempted to draw a large, seamless city, it's another corridor shooter. GTA4 could have performed better, certainly, one of the later patches in particular actually managed to make it worse, and Mafia 2 had a much slicker engine (but was an absolute fucking abortion of a game IMO), but GTA4 was also intentionally stylised, it's not supposed to be photoreal. And it didn't crash for me once in around 200 hours of game time. That's virtually unheard of these days. But I'm from an old-school generation of gamers who isn't afraid to turn down the graphics settings a bit.

If you hate the game so much, take solace in the peanuts you undoubtedly paid for it (It cost me a ridiculous $7.49 or something, several years ago) and move on to something else.

But what do I know, I actually quite liked Niko and his sly "this is my life, then" melancholy. Fucking Roman can DIAF.

I hated Mafia 2 too, the mechanics and driving were great, but it felt like that 80% of the content was missing, either unfinished on time, or cut out for later possible dlcs. It was the most disappointing game of the year for me back then.

I'm also a long time gamer, but I admit I have a very hard time turning down graphics settings on any game. I rather choose to play F1GP2 with 15fps than to turn down graphics too much on my AMD K5. But I never felt that GTAIv had unrealistic hw requirements. IT looked miles better than the console version could dream of even on low settings. And I'm expecting the same from GTAV, to be future proof.
 
I hated Mafia 2 too, the mechanics and driving were great, but it felt like that 80% of the content was missing, either unfinished on time, or cut out for later possible dlcs. It was the most disappointing game of the year for me back then.

I'm also a long time gamer, but I admit I have a very hard time turning down graphics settings on any game. I rather choose to play F1GP2 with 15fps than to turn down graphics too much on my AMD K5. But I never felt that GTAIv had unrealistic hw requirements. IT looked miles better than the console version could dream of even on low settings. And I'm expecting the same from GTAV, to be future proof.

I don't recall what the hardware requirements were at the time, but what I do know is that it ran like crap even on high end hardware. I bought it the day it came out and could barely play it, despite having a high end card (I bought only high end cards up until recently). I was forced to turn the settings down to have anywhere near a playable experience.
 
I really wish they would make a modern GTA2 -- you know, top view style. That stuff was fun! When GTA3 came out and they started going more first/third-person shooter everything just went downhill. :(
 
I really wish they would make a modern GTA2 -- you know, top view style. That stuff was fun! When GTA3 came out and they started going more first/third-person shooter everything just went downhill. :(

Play GTA: Chinatown Wars, good game, good reviews. On PSP, DS, Driod and iOS. The drug wars mini-game alone you can spend many hours on having fun.
 
Big post.

Don't think you remember well enough. Simply touching a cop gets them to shoot you. Problem is you can't not run from them because you're already moving. So your point is moot. I don't mind out running cops, but seeing them spawn out of thin air or going nuts and shooting on sight is rather absurd. Because that is 90% of the game.

I also think you should get your car serviced, because if you can't make a turn at 20 MPH without spinning out of control something is wrong. :p Might want to check your breaks to.

Comparing it visually with Crysis is laughable. Crysis never attempted to draw a large, seamless city, it's another corridor shooter.

You must have played a different Crysis from me.
 
My main issue with GTA IV was how poorly it ran on basically any machine.
 
I don't recall what the hardware requirements were at the time, but what I do know is that it ran like crap even on high end hardware. I bought it the day it came out and could barely play it, despite having a high end card (I bought only high end cards up until recently). I was forced to turn the settings down to have anywhere near a playable experience.

That's exactly my point, that it had much better graphics than the competition even with turned down graphics. You weren't meant to play it on max settings on release, even on the best hardware. And some people couldn't accept that. I on the other hand set it up to run well, and had a blast with it, while it still looked miles better than anything with such a crowded open world.
 
Don't think you remember well enough. Simply touching a cop gets them to shoot you. Problem is you can't not run from them because you're already moving. So your point is moot. I don't mind out running cops, but seeing them spawn out of thin air or going nuts and shooting on sight is rather absurd. Because that is 90% of the game.

I also think you should get your car serviced, because if you can't make a turn at 20 MPH without spinning out of control something is wrong. :p Might want to check your breaks to.



You must have played a different Crysis from me.

Well this is really moot because either you're trolling now, or really couldn't grasp the concept of "full lock"
 
The game was released, what? 7 years ago? Why is OP bitching about it now?

Yes it ran like a complete dog when it came out on pc with its broken DRM but it was fixed somewhat with 1.0.4.0, yes the driving mechanics was a bit weird compared to SA, yes the graphics colour palette was a bit too much of shades of fucking grey but the game itself was a different turn from what VC and SA offered.

If you don't like the graphics, try the vast amount of mods out there that improves this to a night and day difference level.

Not to mention there is also EFLC if you didn't like Niko from the main storyline.

GTA IV's storyline itself bests what GTA V is as a whole except the graphics and visuals obviously.

If you don't like the game move on and play another game.
 
You must have played a different Crysis from me.

If the Crysis you played was an open-world sandbox game set in a city, then yes, I must have done.

More valid comparisons with GTA4 are games such as Mafia 2, or Saints Row 3, or Sleeping Dogs. And guess what? None of those look like Crysis either.
 
Crysis was only open-world for the first half of it. Once the aliens showed up...not so much.
 
OP failed at installing, then proceeds to suck at the game and blames the game for his failure. Nothing to see here...
 
It still runs sluggish on my modern PC with a 4790k and GTX 970.

I tried to play it recently, and rage-quit when a stealth mission failed because Roman called wanting to play darts.

I mean, WTF?
 
- No save system. Game partially saves occasionally, otherwise you have to spend 20-40 minutes going to a safe house to save your game.
It does have one of the worst save systems. Die in a mission and you're sent way back to the beginning of it which ends up being far away from where the action starts.
 
It does have one of the worst save systems. Die in a mission and you're sent way back to the beginning of it which ends up being far away from where the action starts.

The expansions fix this, Lost and Damn & Gay Tony. They have mid-mission checkpoints even.

Expansions are better than the core game. Highly recommend it.
 
Having played GTA 3, Vice City, Chinatown Wars (DS) and GTA V, I would confidently say GTA IV is the worst of the bunch. Not that it is a bad game, but not on par with the others.

As others have said the PC port was poorly done in terms of optimization.

Regarding the expansions, I didn't like the Lost and the Damned either. But the Ballad of Gay Tony is actually a very good game, highly recommended.
 
I agree, GTA3, VC, San Andreas, GTAV all are more fun, and better than GTAIV.

I didn't like the lost either, I think that expansion is more boring than the niko bellic story, which is an achievement in itself.

So anyone new to GTAIV must start with Ballad of Gay Tony, that's what a GTA game is supposed to be like.


But this doesn't make the OP right not even slightly.
 
Regarding the expansions, I didn't like the Lost and the Damned either. But the Ballad of Gay Tony is actually a very good game, highly recommended.

Really? I loved the whole biker gang them. Story and missions in Gay Tony was better. Yet not many games out there though that capture riding with a pack like Lost & Damn.

I imagine if they made a Sons of Anarchy game, it would be much like that.
 
Really? I loved the whole biker gang them. Story and missions in Gay Tony was better. Yet not many games out there though that capture riding with a pack like Lost & Damn.

I imagine if they made a Sons of Anarchy game, it would be much like that.

Spoiler alert...
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Considering the fate of Johnny Klebitz at the start of GTA V I must not be the only one who didn't like Lost and the Damned.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top